Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05064176

Added Value of Reconstructive Lymphatic Surgery to Usual Care in Lymphoedema

The primary objective of this research proposal is to investigate

* in patients with lymphoedema of the upper limb or lower limb (P) * the added value of reconstructive lymphatic surgery (I) * to the decongestive lymphatic therapy (usual care) (C) * on the lymphoedema-specific quality of life (QoL) (O) * at 18 months post-surgery/ no surgery (T)

Consequently, a multicentre pragmatic randomised controlled trial is performed to give an answer on following research question: 'Is, in addition to usual care - i.e. decongestive lymphatic therapy -, reconstructive lymphatic surgery (intervention group) superior to no surgery (control group), for the treatment of upper or lower limb lymphoedema?'

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Lymphoedema is a chronic and often debilitating condition caused by lymphatic insufficiency. It leads to swelling of the limb and an increased risk of infection. It can be classified as primary (congenital) or secondary (acquired) lymphoedema.

Lymphoedema is very burdensome for the patient and therefore is it often associated with mental problems for example frustration and stress. In addition, because of the increase in volume of the limb, patients also develop physical problems, such as pain, heaviness, loss of strength, and develop functional problems, such as problems with household, mobility or social activities. These mental, physical and functional problems all have a negative impact on quality of life and have an influence on the ability to work. Consensus exist that the first choice of treatment is a conservative treatment. This conservative treatment consists of skin care, compression therapy (i.e. multilayer bandaging and compression garments), exercises and lymph drainage. Reconstructive lymphatic surgery is another option, also often performed: i.e. lymphovenous anastomoses, on the one hand, and a lymph node transfer, on the other hand. By (partially) restoring the lymphatic transport, the reconstructive lymphatic surgery may possibly lead to a larger decrease of the lymphoedema volume and therefore greater discontinuation of the compression garment. Consequently, patients will have an improvement in functioning and quality of life.

Currently, scientific evidence for reconstructive lymphatic surgery for the treatment of lymphoedema is missing. Therefore, the aim of this trial is to investigate the added value of reconstructive lymphatic surgery of the lymphatic system in addition to the conservative treatment, for the treatment of lymphoedema.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Unilateral or bilateral, primary or secondary lymphoedema of the upper or lower limb
  • If cancer-related lymphoedema, approval for participation in study from oncological specialist (patient participation has to be discussed during Multidisciplinary Oncological Consult); approval if:
  • estimated cancer-related survival is ≥3 years
  • oncological safety is guaranteed: for instance, time interval since radiotherapy/ chemotherapy is ≥3 months
  • Lymphoedema stage 1 to 2b
  • Objective diagnosis of lymphoedema: ≥ 5% volume difference OR ≥ 2 minor/ 1 major criteria on lymphoscintigraphy OR presence of IndoCyanineGreen (ICG) dermal backflow
  • Score on Lymph-ICF questionnaire at screening: ≥ 25 / 100 (= moderate level of problems in functioning related to the development of lymphoedema)
  • History of at least 6 months of decongestive lymphatic therapy (DLT) until minimal pitting
  • Age ≥ 18 years

Exclusion criteria

  • Participants with history of liposuction, lymphovenous anastomosis, lymph node transfer
  • Pregnant participants
  • Severe obese participants: BMI>35
  • Estimated cancer-related survival is <3 years and oncological safety is not guaranteed (e.g. interval since radiotherapy/ chemotherapy is <3 months)
  • In case of lower limb lymphoedema: presence of chronic venous insufficiency C4, C5, C6; deep venous thrombosis; post-thrombotic syndrome
  • Allergy for ICG, iodine, penicillin and sulphonamides; increased activity of thyroid gland; benign tumour in thyroid; heparin use and severe renal insufficiency

Treatment and study plan

Usual Care

Other

Home physical therapist performs usual care and educates the patient to perform self-management

Usual care:

M1-6: 6 months of maintenance decongestive lymphatic therapy (DLT) (by patient and home physical therapist):

  • week 1-2: no physical therapy; patient performs limb elevation, muscle contractions and wears the bandage (intervention group)/ compression garment (control group)
  • week 3-4: start physical therapy, 2 days/ week: exercises, skin care & manual lymph drainage (MLD), education; self-management by patient and wearing compression garment 14-16h/day (4 sessions) M2-6: 1 day/ week physical therapist: exercises, skin care & MLD, and self-management by patient and wearing compression garment 14-16h/day (20 sessions)

M7-12: 6 months of maintenance DLT by patient (self-management) and home physical therapist:

  • 1 day/week physical therapist: skin care, MLD, exercises (26 sessions) Month 13-18: 6 months of maintenance DLT by patient Month 19-36: 18 months of follow-up

Reconstructive lymphatic surgery

Procedure

For the procedure of LVA:

  • Aim: making anastomoses of lymph vessels at the capillary level with a diameter of 0.3 to 0.8 mm, to redirect lymph to venous stream directly

For the procedure of LNT:

  • Aim:
  • Placed lymph nodes act as sponge to absorb lymphatic fluid and direct it into the vascular network;
  • Placed lymph nodes induce lymphangiogenesis

Primary outcomes

  1. Lymphoedema-specific QoL (or problems in functioning related to development of lymphoedema)

    Time frame: at 18 months

    evaluated with the Dutch or French version of the Lymph-ICF questionnaire for upper or lower limb lymphoedema

Secondary outcomes

  1. Lymphoedema-specific QoL (or problems in functioning related to development of lymphoedema)

    Time frame: at 1, 3, 6, 12 (short term) and 24, 36 (longer term) months

    evaluated with the Dutch or French version of the Lymph-ICF questionnaire for upper or lower limb lymphoedema

  2. General health-related QoL

    Time frame: at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 months

    evaluated with the EuroQol-5D-5L questionnaire

  3. Limb volume

    Time frame: at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 (key secondary outcome), 24, 36 months

    evaluated using circumference measures (ml)

  4. Failure to reduce the hours a day of wearing the compression stocking

    Time frame: at 12, 18, 24, 36 months

    failure is defined as not able to continue the reduction of the hours of wearing the compression garment as stated by the protocol

  5. The hours of wearing the compression garment during one week

    Time frame: at 12, 18 (key secondary outcome), 24, 36 months

    evaluated with the International Compression Club (ICC) questionnaire ('dosage score' between 0-168h)

  6. The experience of the compression garment

    Time frame: at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 months

    evaluated with the International Compression Club (ICC) questionnaire ('comfort score' between 0-10 and 'complication score' between 0-10)

  7. The physical activity level

    Time frame: at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 months

    evaluated with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) - short form (MET-hours/week)

  8. The need for intensive treatment due to an increase in lymphoedema volume

    Time frame: at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 months

    through interview

  9. Body weight

    Time frame: at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 months

    measured using a balance

  10. Work capacity

    Time frame: at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 months

    evaluated with the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI-GH) questionnaire

  11. Work ability

    Time frame: at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 months

    evaluated with the Quickscan 18 (short form) questionnaire

  12. Infection during the previous 18 months (yes/no)

    Time frame: at 18, 36 months (adverse events are collected during each clinical assessment but the amount of infections as secondary outcome are taken together for statistical analyses per 18 months)

    through interview

  13. Complications of surgery

    Time frame: at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 months

    through interview

  14. Recurrence of cancer (yes/no)

    Time frame: at 36 months

    through medical file

  15. Lymphatic transport

    Time frame: at 18 months

    through lymphoscintigraphy

  16. Costs related to lymphoedema and its treatment during previous 18 months

    Time frame: at 18, 36 months

    through interview

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Nele Devoogdt

CONTACT

[email protected]

0032 16 34 25 15

Tessa De Vrieze

CONTACT

[email protected]

0032 16 34 50 06

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Reconstructive Lymphatic Surgery Versus no Surgery, Additional to Decongestive Lymphatic Therapy (Usual Care), for the Treatment of Iymphoedema, Through a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial

Acronym: SurLym

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2026
First posted
Oct 1, 2021
Registry last updated
Jul 3, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.