Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07600606

Add a Legume to Your Cart

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a healthy diet promotion intervention focused on increasing legume consumption. The intervention is delivered via mobile application in a sample drawn from the healthy adult population.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–30 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1

Milan, 20126, Italy

About this study

This study investigates the effects of different communication strategies on behavioral change. The intervention is designed to promote legume consumption. After compiling different profiling and assessment questionnaires, participants watch one of three different possible type of brief video performed by professional actors that discuss the benefits of eating more legumes in terms of health and environmental benefits. Then, with an ad-hoc designed task, they do a simulated grocery shopping and an automatic task to assess approach-avoidance tendency towards meat vs. legumes dishes. Finally, explicit attitudes are assessed.

Group differences are explored across three experimental conditions, which vary in the communication strategies. Group 1 watches a video with an educational communicative style and content (EDUCATIONAL), group watches a video presented with a persuasive style, and general content (PERSUASIVE), while group 3 watches a persuasive video with tailored content, based on the profiling phase (TAILORED).

The primary aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of these different communication strategies on attitudes and legume purchase. Secondary aims include the investigation of differences in other unspecific purchases.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • be university students (enrolled in a bachelor's degree, master's degree/specialized degree/single-cycle degree program, or postgraduate education);
  • own a smartphone.

Exclusion criteria

  • consume an adequate amount of legumes (> 3 servings);
  • suffer from one or more conditions that could represent a contraindication to the consumption of certain specific categories of legumes, such as favism, allergies, irritable bowel syndrome, short bowel syndrome and/or leaky gut, forms of intestinal dysbiosis, or other intestinal disorders.

Treatment and study plan

educational

Other

Participants watch an educational video about the benefits of eating legumes. Then, they perform the grocery shopping simulation and the automatic task for approach/avoidance assessment

Persuasive

Other

Participants watch a persuasive video with educational content about the benefits of eating legumes. Then, they perform the grocery shopping simulation

Tailored

Other

Participants watch a persuasive video with a tailored content about the benefits of eating legumes. Then, they perform the grocery shopping simulation

Primary outcomes

  1. Portions of purchased legumes - task 1 - simulation on online grocery shopping

    Time frame: T1 - day 3. After compiling the baseline assessment (T0) at day 1, participants received the link to complete the second part of the survey at day 3, which was to be completed by the end of the day.

    In the first task, specifically designed for the present study, participants are asked to complete a simulated online grocery shopping for the following week. The task is structured to closely resemble a real shopping experience: each item can be added to the virtual cart in a potentially unlimited number of units, with higher values indicating larger quantities purchased and a value of zero indicating that the item was not selected.

    The primary outcome will consist of the total number of legume-based items selected, subsequently converted into servings. This conversion process will be carried out by the nutrition research team.

  2. Explicit attitudes about legumes

    Time frame: T1 - day 3. After compiling the baseline assessment (T0) at day 1, participants received the link to complete the second part of the survey at day 3, which was to be completed by day 3.

    Participants were asked to express their opinions about legumes using six different bipolar scales, introduced with the following instruction:

    "Now think about legumes (e.g., chickpeas, peas, beans, lentils, broad beans). Which adjectives do you consider most appropriate to describe them? Please respond to each pair of adjectives without overthinking your answer."

    The bipolar adjective pairs were as follows: negative-positive; bland-tasty; isolating-convivial; unsatisfying-satiating; difficult-easy; loser-winner.

    Responses were recorded on 7-point scales ranging from 1 (indicating the negative pole of each adjective pair) to 7 (indicating the positive pole of each adjective pair).

  3. Swipe Approach-Avoidance Task (SwipeAAT)

    Time frame: T1 - day 3. After compiling the baseline assessment (T0) at day 1, participants received the link to complete the second part of the survey at day 3, which was to be completed by day 3.

    The Swipe Approach-Avoidance Task (SwipeAAT) is a smartphone-based version of the Approach-Avoidance Task, in which participants interact with visual stimuli according to specific instructions. Stimuli must either be "approached" (by swiping upward) or "avoided" (by swiping downward) depending on the instructions provided. Reaction times recorded during task performance are analyzed to infer spontaneous behavioral tendencies of approach or avoidance toward the presented stimuli.

    To assess spontaneous approach and avoidance tendencies toward legumes and meat, two scores were computed for each participant:

    Legume SwipeAAT score, calculated as the difference between the mean of all valid latencies (see Data Exclusion) for the "Avoid legumes" trials and the "Approach legumes" trials.

    Meat SwipeAAT score, calculated as the difference between the mean of all valid latencies (see Data Exclusion) for the "Avoid meat" trials and the "Approach meat" trials.

  4. Intention to increase legumes portions in the future - single ad hoc item

    Time frame: T1 - day 3. After compiling the baseline assessment (T0) at day 1, participants received the link to complete the second part of the survey at day 3, which was to be completed by day 3.

    Participants were asked to report their future intention to increase their weekly consumption of legumes using a single-item measure ("Do you intend to increase your consumption of legumes in the near future?"). Responses were provided on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 ("absolutely not") to 5 ("absolutely yes").

Secondary outcomes

  1. Portions of other purchased items - task 1 - simulation on online grocery shopping

    Time frame: T1 - day 3. After compiling the baseline assessment (T0) at day 1, participants received the link to complete the second part of the survey at day 3, which was to be completed by day 3.

    In addition to legumes, purchases made during the online grocery shopping simulation task will also be analyzed for other categories of interest, including meat, fruit and vegetables, processed foods, and related product categories.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Milano Bicocca

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Add a Legume to Your Cart: The Role of Tailored Communication in Promoting Healthier and More Sustainable Food Purchasing - A Study Within the Framework of the PNRR 10 ON FOODS Partnership

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
May 20, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 11, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.