cemiplimab
DrugCemiplimab 350 mg IV administered every 3 weeks
NCT Number: NCT07746388
This research study is being done to find out if a drug called cemiplimab is safe in adult patients who have non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that can be surgically removed (resectable Stage II, IIIA, or select IIIB NSCLC). The purpose of this study is also to look at how well the study drug works and whether certain patients can skip chemotherapy before their surgery. The goal is to see if they can safely avoid the harsh side effects of chemo and still have a successful outcome.
We are doing this study because we want to find out if this treatment approach is better or worse than the usual approach for early-stage NSCLC that can be surgically removed. The usual approach for your type of cancer is treatment with a combination of platinum-doublet chemotherapy and an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) such as cemiplimab (LIBTAYO®) given before the tumor is surgically removed. (Immune checkpoint is a normal part of the immune system used to prevent an immune response from becoming so strong that it inadvertently destroys healthy cells in the body).
Cemiplimab is given via infusion and will be administered at the study center. Everyone on the study will get the active study drug, cemiplimab. No one will get placebo. Placebos look like the study drug but don't have medicine in them.
Infusion of cemiplimab will be given for 2 cycles followed by an evaluation. An evaluation means that you will have imaging studies ("scans") done to see if the tumor has changed. After the scans, you may receive one final cycle of cemiplimab followed by resection (surgery to remove the tumor) or combination chemotherapy plus cemiplimab for 2 cycles followed by resection.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Current standard of care for patients with EGFR/ALK wild-type, resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a combination of platinum-doublet chemotherapy plus anti-PD (L)1 therapy given pre-operatively prior to definitive resection. This is based on repeated positive phase III trials showing improvement in pathologic response, event-free survival and overall survival compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. However, this one-size-fits all approach does not take into account the role of prognostic and predictive biomarkers to help further personalize and refine neoadjuvant systemic therapy approaches. In the metastatic setting biomarkers, including PD L1 expression of tumors, can help select patients who may receive anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy. Specifically, for patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, evidence shows equivalent survival benefit compared to combination chemoimmunotherapy, effectively sparing this portion of patients the toxicity of chemotherapy. Whether a similar approach may be applied to the early-stage setting is an active question.
To further explore this question our group has performed an extensive systematic review and meta-analysis from 29 prospective neoadjuvant trials utilizing either PD-(L)1 monotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy, assessing pathologic response and EFS rates based on available PD-L1 expression data. Our findings showed PD-L1 expression was associated with both pathologic complete response (pCR) and major pathologic response (MPR) rates after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and PD-(L)1 monotherapy. Through meta-regression analysis, both PD-L1 expression and type of systemic therapy were independently associated with pCR and MPR. Although chemoimmunotherapy had a numerically higher pCR and MPR rates, a notable proportion of patients with PD L1≥ 50% achieved a MPR when treated with PD-(L)1 monotherapy before surgical resection, suggesting a significant cohort of patients may receive meaningful pathologic regression with just PD-(L)1 therapy alone. Preliminary findings from our analysis utilizing individual patient data with reconstruction of available KM-curves has also indicated superior EFS/RFS with PD-(L)1 monotherapy compared to chemoimmunotherapy for patients with PD-L1 ≥1% disease, again highlighting the potential durable impact of ICB for biomarker-selected patients.
Therefore, in order to prospectively validate the utility of neoadjuvant PD-1 monotherapy for the treatment of resectable NSCLC in patients with PD-L1 ≥50%, we propose a phase 2 pilot study of 30 patients using a novel adaptive treatment strategy. This adaptive treatment strategy will incorporate upfront neoadjuvant single-agent cemiplimab for two cycles followed by radiographic and clinical reassessment. Pending this interval assessment patients will proceed with either one final cycle of cemiplimab monotherapy followed by resection or combination chemotherapy plus cemiplimab for two cycles followed by resection. This interval assessment will allow treating physicians to escalate neoadjuvant systemic therapy if there is any concern for clinical or radiographic progression with single-agent cemiplimab, all in an effort to appropriately tailor our neoadjuvant approach in this biomarker selected cohort.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
a. Tissue source may be a formalin fixed paraffin block (FFPE) of a previous tumor biopsy sample. Source of biomarker testing may be obtained from archived tissue if adequate or from a new biopsy, if needed and clinically indicated.
AST, ALT, Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 3 x ULN per local testing 11. Subjects are deemed capable of giving informed consent and must have signed and dated an IRB approved written informed consent form. This written consent must be obtained before the performance of any protocol related procedures that are not part of normal standard of care. 12. Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must have negative serum or urine pregnancy testing within 30 days of study start
Exclusion criteria
a. For patients in whom more comprehensive testing is performed, those with identified targetable alterations in ROS1, NTRK, RET, METex14, HER2 genes will also be excluded. Screening for these specific alterations (ROS1/NTRK/RET/METex14/HER2), however, are not required for enrollment.
Cemiplimab 350 mg IV administered every 3 weeks
Time frame: At time of surgery
MPR is defined as ≤ 10% viable tumor cells in resected tumor after complete evaluation in the resected lung cancer specimen as determined by central pathology review and described by IASLC 2020 assessment criteria. The measure of interest is the proportion of treated patients with ≤ 10% residual viable tumor cells within all resected tissue as confirmed by the central pathology review.
Time frame: ≤ 42 days from last dose of systemic therapy
Feasibility of neoadjuvant cemiplimab, using an adaptive treatment strategy, will be evaluated. Feasibility will be measured as the successful completion of definitive resection within 42 days of the last dose of systemic therapy without undue delays.
Time frame: Occurring up until 100 days after the last dose of study treatment or 30 days following surgery, whichever is longer.
Safety will be measured by the frequency (or rate) and severity of any drug related adverse events, including serious adverse events (defined by CTCAE version 5), up until 100 days after the last dose of study treatment or 30 days following surgery, whichever is longer.
Time frame: At time of surgery
pCR is defined as lack of any viable tumor cells after complete evaluation in the resected lung cancer specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes as determined by central pathology review and described by IASLC 2020 assessment criteria. The measure of interest is the proportion of resected patients with 0% residual viable tumor cells within all resected tissue as confirmed by the central pathology review.
Time frame: Up to 24 months from time of treatment initiation
EFS is defined as the time from treatment initiation to any of the following events: any progression of disease precluding definitive treatment, progression or recurrence disease after definitive therapy, or death due to any cause. Participants who don't undergo surgery for reasons other than progression will be considered to have an event.
Time frame: Up to 24 months from time of treatment initiation
OS is defined as elapsed time (in months) from treatment initiation to death for any participants who receive study treatment, regardless of whether they receive surgical resection.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Kaylee Martin
CONTACT
Samuel Rosner, MD
CONTACT
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03999710
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04585490
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Stanford, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07323732
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Basking Ridge, New Jersey, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04223596
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
A Coruña, Spain
View Trial Details