Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00980057

Adaptive Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Study

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the AdaptivCRT algorithm is at least as good as manual echo based optimization in regard to patient outcomes and cardiac performance

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Adelaide, Australia

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The trial has 3 primary end points:

  • to demonstrate that over 6-month follow-up, the proportion of the patients improved in the aCRT arm is at least as high as in the Echo arm
  • to demonstrate that cardiac function is similar when using aCRT versus echo-optimized settings
  • to demonstrate that aCRT does not result in inappropriate AV or VV delay settings

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject is willing to sign and date the study Informed Consent form
  • Subject is at least 18 years of age (or older, if required by local law)
  • Subject is expected to remain available for at least six months of follow-up visits
  • Subject is indicated for a study device that will be implanted within 30 days after signing the Informed Consent form
  • Subject has an intrinsic QRS duration greater than or equal to 120 milliseconds (documented within 30 days prior to enrollment)
  • Subject has a left ventricular ejection fraction less than or equal to 35 percent (method per physician discretion) (documented within 180 days prior to enrollment)
  • Subject is diagnosed with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV (within 30 days prior to enrollment) despite optimal medical therapy which is defined as: ACE-inhibitor (Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme) or Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker (ARB), if tolerated, for at least one month prior to implant, AND beta-blocker for at least three months preceding implant, if tolerated, and stable for one month, OR subject has an urgent medical need for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) that precludes waiting the one or three months for the medication requirements for ACE inhibitor, ARB or beta-blocker

Exclusion criteria

  • Subject has chronic (permanent) atrial arrhythmias for which pharmacological therapy and/or cardioversion have been unsuccessful or have not been attempted
  • Subject has existing CRT system
  • Subject has non-intact or unstable leads
  • Subject has medical conditions that would limit study participation (per physician discretion)
  • Subject is enrolled in one or more concurrent studies that would confound the study results of this study as determined by Medtronic
  • Subject has unstable angina, or experienced an acute myocardial infarction (MI) or received coronary artery revascularization (CABG) or coronary angioplasty (PTCA) (documented within 30 days prior to enrollment)
  • Subject has a mechanical right heart valve or is scheduled to undergo valve repair or valve replacement during the course of the study
  • Subject is post-heart transplant (subjects on the heart transplant list for the first time are not excluded)
  • Subject has a limited life expectancy that would not allow completion of the 6 month visit
  • Subject is pregnant (In the United States, all women of child-bearing potential must undergo a pregnancy test within seven days prior to aCRT download into device)
  • Subject meets the exclusion criteria required by local law

Treatment and study plan

Adaptive CRT (aCRT)

Device

Adaptive CRT (aCRT) is an algorithm, which provides ambulatory adjustment of pacing configuration (LV-only or BiV) and AV and VV delays based on periodic automatic evaluation of electrical conduction to optimize cardiac function

Other names: aCRT

Echo

Device

Standard BiV pacing with settings optimized using a standardized echocardiographic protocol

Other names: Control

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patients With Improved Heart Failure Outcomes Clinical Composite Score

    Time frame: randomization to six month visit

    Patients considered worsened if they died, were hospitalized with worsening heart failure (HF), crossed over to other arm, demonstrated worsening in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, or reported moderately/markedly worse on 'patient global assessment' compared to before CRT implant. Patients are improved if they are not worsened and have an improved NYHA or reported moderately/markedly improved on the 'patient global assessment' compared to before CRT implant

    Global assessment question for the patient: Specifically in reference to your heart failure symptoms, how do you feel today as compared to how you felt before your CRT system was implanted? O Markedly improved O Moderately improved O Mildly improved O No change O Slightly worse O Moderately worse O Markedly worse

  2. Correlation Between Aortic Velocity Time Integral (AoVTI) at Adaptive CRT and Echo-optimized Device Settings

    Time frame: randomization visit and six month visit

    Correlation between aortic velocity time integral (AoVTI) at Adaptive CRT and echo-optimized device settings. AoVTI is an echocardiographic representative of stroke volume and cardiac performance.

  3. Percentage of Patients With a Safety Event (Inappropriate AV or VV Delay Settings Related to the aCRT Feature)

    Time frame: randomization to 6 months post randomization

    For each subject, the Adaptive CRT-determined AV and VV delay settings from randomization up to 183-days post-randomization were evaluated to identify any period of 28-days with a wide delay range (>60 ms)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Right Ventricular Pacing Percentage

    Time frame: implant to six months post randomization

    The percentage of time the right ventricle is paced by the device

  2. Change in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Index (LVESVi)

    Time frame: baseline to six month visit

    Change in left ventricular end systolic volume index (LVESVi).

  3. Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)

    Time frame: baseline to six month visit

  4. Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification

    Time frame: baseline to six month visit

    The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification places patients in one of four categories based on how much they are limited during physical activity.

    Class - Patient Symptoms I - No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath).

    II- Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath).

    III- Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea.

    IV- Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases.

  5. Change in Distance Walked During the Six Minute Hall Walk

    Time frame: baseline to six month visit

  6. Change in Quality of Life Measured by the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHF)

    Time frame: baseline to six month visit

    The MLWHF is a 21 question survey. Scores range from 0-105, with lower scores indicating better health.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure

Industry

Registry information

Acronym: aCRT

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2011
Study completion
2012
First posted
Sep 18, 2009
Registry last updated
Oct 16, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.