Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03783533

Adapting Behavioral Activation to Technology Platform

This project aims to use an asynchronous remote communities (ARC) approach both to discover the design requirements for adapting Behavioral Activation (BA) to ARC as well as design/build an ARC platform for administering BA. The investigators will test the feasibility of our approach in a small feasibility observational study with clinicians and adolescents.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

13 year–17 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Washington

Seattle, Washington, 98115, United States

About this study

An estimated 3.1 million adolescents are diagnosed with depression (MDD) each year (SAMHSA, 2016), and adolescent onset MDD is associated with chronic physical, mental and psychosocial disability (Birmaher et al., 1996). However, over 60% of adolescents with MDD do not receive mental health care, and, among those who do, treatment engagement is low (SAMHSA, 2016; Olfson et al., 2003). Behavioral Activation (BA) is an evidence-based psychosocial intervention (EBPI) for individuals with MDD (Dimidjian et al., 2006). While BA holds promise as an effective treatment with adolescents (McCauley et al., 2015, 2016), previous research approaches have found that adolescents may be better reached and engaged through social media, mobile technologies, and other technology platforms (Boyd, 2007; Park & Calamaro, 2013). In addition, BA requires frequent interaction from patients over time, which can be difficult and costly for clinicians to administer directly. Thus, there is an opportunity to improve usability and engagement of EBPIs via new technology-based tools. Asynchronous Remote Communities (ARC) is a promising technology-based approach for engaging adolescents that capitalizes on the reach of technology while also providing support, social interactions, and motivation to engage. ARCs are technology-mediated groups that use private online platforms to deliver weekly tasks to participants and gather information about perceptions in a format that is lightweight, accessible, usable, and low burden. The investigators aim to use ARC both to discover the design requirements for adapting BA to ARC as well as design/build an ARC platform for administering BA. The investigators will test the feasibility of our approach in a small feasibility study with clinicians and adolescents. The investigators propose the following specific aims:

Aim 1: Use the ARC approach with adolescents, primary care physicians, and mental health specialists to discover target user needs, design constraints and to observe their experience with ARC: The investigators will first use ARC to collect target user (i.e., primary care providers (PCP) and mental health specialists, adolescents at risk for depression) data to understand their needs and the facilitators and barriers to adapting BA to ARC.

Aim 2: Design & build an ARC platform for BA delivery with adolescents: Once the investigators have a strong understanding of the facilitators and barriers, the investigators will design a platform to use the ARC approach for BA delivery via Slack. The investigators will use an iterative design approach to understand the technical feasibility of the approach, whether and how to automate parts of the BA intervention using chatbots and other custom applications within Slack. The investigators will conduct small, informal usability testing with target users during this stage.

Aim 3: Test feasibility and usability with small pilot groups of adolescent and clinician target users: Once the investigators have a robust enough prototype of the ARC delivery platform for BA, the investigators will conduct a small pilot study with adolescents at-risk for depression and clinicians to assess the feasibility and usability of the approach. The investigators will collect data on the feasibility, usability, user burden, acceptability, and symptom outcomes.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adolescents with PHQ-9 scores between 5 and 15 (Mild to Moderate Range) who do not report current suicidality (Pine et al., 1999) will be recruited from clinician target users' practice settings.

Exclusion criteria

  • Current suicidal ideation or PHQ-9 scores that are below or above the cutoff described above for adolescents.

Treatment and study plan

Behavioral Activation

Behavioral

Intervention: Behavioral Activation (BA) therapy is based on a functional analytic model of depression that highlights the need for increased positive reinforcement (rewards) and decreased anhedonia, or diminished motivation to seek rewards, to maintain normal mood. BA is significantly more effective than Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and comparable to antidepressant medication in reducing depressive symptoms among depressed adults (Dimidjian et al., 2006). McCauley (senior mentor) et al. (2016) adapted BA for adolescents to target anhedonia, effective problem solving and avoidant behaviors with peers, family, and school. McCauley's findings and others show BA is a promising intervention for adolescent MDD (Chu et al., 2009; Cuijpers et al.,, 2007; McCauley et al., 2015; Ritschel et al., 2011). BA focuses on targeting ideographically identified avoidant behaviors and rewarding experiences that affect mood.

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient Health Questionnaire-Adolescent (PHQ-8)

    Time frame: Measured within 3-weeks post BA App User Testing

    Measures symptoms of adolescent depression; Scores range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating higher depression symptoms.

  2. User Burden Scale

    Time frame: Measured within 3-weeks post BA App User Testing

    Assesses the burden of the intervention adaptation with both clinician and adolescent participants across several domains and ranges from 0 to 80 for a total score with higher scores indicating higher burden. Scores were averaged across subscales including:

    • Access Burden
    • Emotional Burden
    • Financial Burden
    • Mental Burden
    • Physical Burden
    • Privacy Burden
    • Social Burden
    • Time Burden
  3. Acceptability of Intervention Measure

    Time frame: Measured within 3-weeks post BA App User Testing

    This is a survey measure that assesses the acceptability of the intervention adaptation with both clinician and adolescent participants. Scores range from 4 to 20 with higher scores indicating higher acceptability.

  4. Appropriateness of Intervention Measure

    Time frame: Measured within 3-week post BA App User Testing

    This is a survey measure that assesses the appropriateness of the intervention adaptation with both clinician and adolescent participants. Scores range from 4 to 20 with higher scores indicating higher appropriateness.

  5. Feasibility of Intervention Measure

    Time frame: Measured within 3-week post BA App User Testing

    This is a survey measure that assesses the feasibility of the intervention adaptation with both clinician and adolescent participants. Scores range from 4 to 20 with higher scores indicating higher feasibility.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Platform Engagement

    Time frame: Measuring platform engagement across 35 days of platform use.

    Platform mood-activity logging across 35 days of possible logging 3x/day

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Washington

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Registry information

Official study title

Designing and Evaluating an Asynchronous Remote Communication Approach to Behavioral Activation With Clinicians and Adolescents At Risk for Depression

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Dec 21, 2018
Registry last updated
Sep 16, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.