City, University of London
London, EC1V 0HB, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT03245060
Around one third of stroke survivors will have aphasia, which means they will have difficulty talking, understanding, reading or writing. The main aims of this study are to assess: [1] the acceptability of an existing psychosocial intervention, solution focused brief therapy, to people with varying presentations of aphasia; and [2] the feasibility of conducting a future definitive trial investigating clinical and cost effectiveness.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
London, EC1V 0HB, United Kingdom
Background and Aims Around one third of people who have a stroke will experience aphasia, a language disability that can affect talking, understanding, reading or writing. The psychosocial impact of aphasia is considerable: those living with chronic aphasia are at risk of social isolation and depression. One potential intervention is Solution Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT). SFBT is an approach to building positive change in a person's life. It builds up a picture of a client's preferred future; encourages a person to notice positive signs of change; explores personal resources, skills and resilience; and acknowledges the impact of the stroke on a person's life and identity.
The current project builds on a small-scale proof-of-concept study that explored SFBT with five people who had mild to moderate aphasia, at least two years post stroke. There were improvements in participants' mood and participation and participants found the therapy highly acceptable.
The main aims of the current project are to assess: [1] the acceptability of SFBT to people with varying presentations of aphasia; and [2] the feasibility of conducting a future definitive trial investigating clinical and cost effectiveness.
Methods The overall study will last for 38 months (November 2016 to December 2019), and comprise a Development Phase (year 1) and a single-blind, randomized, wait-list controlled, feasibility trial with nested qualitative research comparing SFBT plus usual care to usual care alone (years 2 and 3).
During the Development Phase the investigators will develop the therapy manual and fidelity checking processes, train the clinicians, and finalize the protocol. Phase One has been informed through four workshops with the Aphasia Advisory Group, comprised of four people with aphasia and one carer, who advised on the study protocol and trial documentation. The investigators also conducted a pilot study with four people who have severe expressive and receptive aphasia where the investigators trialed the assessment and therapy protocol, and explored adapting the therapy for people with severe communication difficulties.
For the feasibility trial (commencing October 2017) 32 participants will be recruited with any severity of aphasia, at least six months post stroke. Participants will be randomly assigned to the intervention group or wait-list control group. Both groups will be assessed by a Research Assistant blinded to treatment allocation on psychosocial outcome measures at T1 (baseline, prior to randomization), T2 (three months post randomization) and T3 (six months post randomization). Participants will also take part in in-depth interviews at T3 exploring their experiences of taking part in the project as well as complete a resource use questionnaire. All participants will receive all usual care, and up to six SFBT sessions spaced over three months delivered by Speech and Language Therapists. The intervention group will receive the therapy immediately post randomization, while the wait-list control group will be offered the intervention after T3. The wait-list control will additionally be reassessed at T4 (nine months post randomization). The investigators will also interview the trial clinicians, and the Local Collaborators at the two participant identification sites.
Results The feasibility of recruitment and retention of participants (including proportion who consent; rate of consent; attrition rates) will be assessed, as will treatment fidelity. Descriptive statistics for the clinical outcome measures will be presented, for the entire trial population and by trial arm, at each time point, with means and confidence intervals plotted over time. The proportion of missing data will also be reported. As part of the economic evaluation, the relevant costs and health gains will be presented by trial arm and the completeness of data collection methods and their acceptability will be assessed. Qualitative data on acceptability of the intervention and study procedures will be analysed using Framework Analysis.
Clinical Implications This trial has been designed to assess the acceptability of the intervention for people with varying presentations of aphasia, and the feasibility of conducting a successful definitive trial evaluating clinical and cost effectiveness in the future. Given the high levels of distress and isolation experienced by people living with aphasia, and the current poor evidence base, there is a pressing need to investigate effective psychosocial interventions. SFBT is potentially a relatively brief approach deliverable by Speech and Language Therapists.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Solution Focused Brief Therapy is an approach to building positive change in a person's life. It builds up a picture of a client's preferred future (or how a person would like their life to be); encourages a person to notice positive signs of change; and explores personal resources, skills and resilience. In the present project, the therapy has been adapted so that it works well with people who have a language disability.
Time frame: 6 months post randomization
Measures mental well-being. 14 items, scores range from 14 to 70, with higher scores indicating greater overall mental well-being
Time frame: All participants will complete WEMWBS at baseline, pre-randomization (T1), 3 months post randomization (T2), 6 months post randomization (T3). The wait-list control arm will also be tested at 9 months post randomization (T4).
Measures mental well-being. 14 items, scores range from 14 to 70, with higher scores indicating greater overall mental well-being
Time frame: All participants will complete GHQ-12 at baseline, pre-randomisation (T1), 3 months post randomisation (T2), 6 months post randomisation (T3). The wait-list control arm will also be tested at 9 months post randomisation (T4).
Measures psychological distress. 12 items, scores range from 0 to 12 with higher scores indicating greater levels of distress
Time frame: All participants will complete CPIB at baseline, pre-randomisation (T1), 3 months post randomisation (T2), 6 months post randomisation (T3). The wait-list control arm will also be tested at 9 months post randomisation (T4).
Measures communicative participation. 10 items, scores range from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating communication difficulties interfere less with participation
Time frame: All participants will complete DISCS at baseline, pre-randomisation (T1), 3 months post randomisation (T2), 6 months post randomisation (T3). The wait-list control arm will also be tested at 9 months post randomisation (T4).
Measures depression. Single item scale, scores range from 0 to 5, with a score 0-1 indicating no/low distress, and 5 high distress; designed to be accessible to people with cognitive or communicative deficits.
Time frame: All participants will complete EQ-5D-5L at baseline, pre-randomisation (T1), 3 months post randomisation (T2), 6 months post randomisation (T3). The wait-list control arm will also be tested at 9 months post randomization (T4).
Measures generic health status; the first part of the measure contains 5 dimensions (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) that are rated on 5 levels (from no problems to extreme problems). The second part is a Visual Analogue Scale where a person self-rates their health. The EQ-5D-5L will be used to measure quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained in each group.
City, University of London
Other
Adapted Solution Focused Brief Therapy in Post-stroke Aphasia (SOFIA Trial): a Feasibility Study
Acronym: SOFIA
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01927302
Agrammatism, Agraphia
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06891638
Aphasia, Brain Diseases
West Orange, New Jersey, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05570578
Aphasia, Brain Diseases
Geneva, Canton of Geneva, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT01540383
Aphasia, Behavior
Münster, North Rhine-Westfalia, Germany
View Trial Details