Tümosan Konyaspor Facilities
Konya, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT07320027
The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the acute effects of static stretching, dynamic stretching, and proprioceptive exercises on proprioception, muscle strength, balance, and explosive power in young athletes. The study aims to determine how different stretching and exercise modalities influence short-term performance parameters.
The primary questions this study aims to answer are:
Do static stretching, dynamic stretching, and proprioceptive exercises have different acute effects on proprioception?
Do these interventions cause different changes in muscle strength, balance, and explosive power?
Researchers will compare the static stretching, dynamic stretching, and proprioceptive exercise groups to determine which method produces greater improvements in the measured performance parameters.
Participants will:
Perform one of the three assigned exercise protocols according to a standardized warm-up procedure
Undergo pre- and post-exercise assessments, including:
Proprioception (measured with an isokinetic device)
Muscle strength (measured with an isokinetic device)
Balance (measured with a Y balance test and BESS balance test)
Explosive power (measured with the Sargent Vertical Jump Test)
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me14 year–19 year
Male
Interventional
Not applicable
Konya, Turkey (Türkiye)
This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the acute effects of static stretching, dynamic stretching, and proprioceptive exercises on knee joint position sense (proprioception), muscle strength, balance, and explosive power in young male soccer players.
Proprioception, the ability to sense the position and movement of joints, muscles, and tendons, plays a critical role in maintaining joint stability. Proprioceptive exercises are widely used among athletes to enhance performance and reduce injury risk. Stretching exercises, particularly static and dynamic techniques, are commonly integrated into warm-up routines to improve flexibility, joint range of motion, and neuromuscular function. However, direct comparisons of the acute effects of static stretching, dynamic stretching, and proprioceptive exercises remain limited.
In this study, healthy male soccer players aged 14-19 years, with at least five years of competitive experience, no knee pain in the past two months, and no history of knee surgery, will be included. Participants will be randomly assigned (block randomization) into three groups:
Static Stretching Group - A controlled-position protocol targeting the quadriceps, hamstrings, plantar flexors, and dorsiflexors, with specific hold durations.
Dynamic Stretching Group - A repetitive movement protocol for the same muscle groups, with gradual speed increases.
Proprioceptive Exercise Group - A 10-exercise proprioceptive training program performed on a BOSU ball, focusing on lower-limb awareness, postural control, and dynamic balance.
All groups will perform a standardized 10-minute warm-up on a cycle ergometer before their respective protocols.
Assessments will be conducted before and immediately after the intervention:
Knee joint position sense (proprioception) - measured with an ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer
Muscle strength - isokinetic testing of knee flexors and extensors using the isokinetic device
Static balance - Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) test
Dynamic balance - Y-Balance Test
Explosive power - Sargent Vertical Jump Test
The primary hypothesis is that proprioceptive exercises will produce greater acute improvements in proprioception, balance, and explosive power, while dynamic stretching may yield higher acute gains in muscle strength. Findings from this study are expected to inform evidence-based warm-up and training strategies for young soccer players.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Our exercise group where we applied the static stretching protocol
Other names: SG
Our exercise group where we applied the dynamic stretching protocol
Other names: DG
Proprioceptive Exercise Program
Other names: PG
Time frame: Baseline and 1 day
Angular joint position matching error (degrees) measured using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer with passive reproduction of target angles.
Time frame: Baseline and 1 day
Peak torque (Nm) during knee extension assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s.
Time frame: Baseline and 1 day
Peak torque (Nm) during knee flexion assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s.
Time frame: Baseline and 1 day
Total work (J) produced during knee extension assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s.
Time frame: Baseline and 1 day
Total work (J) produced during knee flexion assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s.
Time frame: Baseline and 1 day
Average work (J) during knee extension assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s.
Time frame: Baseline and 1 day
Average work (J) during knee flexion assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s.
Time frame: Baseline and 1 day
Maximum work (J) during knee extension assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s.
Time frame: Baseline and 1 day
Maximum work (J) during knee flexion assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s.
Time frame: Baseline and 1 day
Average power (W) during knee extension assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s.
Time frame: Baseline and 1 day
verage power (W) during knee flexion assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s.
Time frame: Baseline and 1 day
The knee joint angle (degrees) at which peak torque occurs during knee extension, assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s.
Time frame: Baseline and 1 day
The knee joint angle (degrees) at which peak torque occurs during knee flexion, assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s.
Time frame: Baseline and 1 day
Dynamic balance performance evaluated using the normalized composite reach score from the Y Balance Test (percent).
Time frame: Baseline and 1 day
Static balance performance measured using the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS); higher scores indicate worse balance.
Time frame: Baseline and 1 day
Explosive lower-limb power measured using the Sargent Vertical Jump Test (cm).
Konya Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi
Other
Comparison of the Acute Effects of Static Stretching, Dynamic Stretching, and Proprioceptive Exercises on Proprioception, Muscle Strength, Balance, and Explosive Power: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Acronym: SSDSPE-RCT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07532980
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Knee Injuries
Konya, Karatay, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07467525
Basketball, Behavior
Istanbul, Zeytinburnu, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07221305
Athletic Performance and Injury Risk, Healthy
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07061314
Functional Training, Lower Limb Stability
Busan, South Korea
View Trial Details