Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07320027

Acute Impact of Static, Dynamic, and Proprioceptive Exercises on Proprioception, Strength, Balance, and Explosive Power

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the acute effects of static stretching, dynamic stretching, and proprioceptive exercises on proprioception, muscle strength, balance, and explosive power in young athletes. The study aims to determine how different stretching and exercise modalities influence short-term performance parameters.

The primary questions this study aims to answer are:

Do static stretching, dynamic stretching, and proprioceptive exercises have different acute effects on proprioception?

Do these interventions cause different changes in muscle strength, balance, and explosive power?

Researchers will compare the static stretching, dynamic stretching, and proprioceptive exercise groups to determine which method produces greater improvements in the measured performance parameters.

Participants will:

Perform one of the three assigned exercise protocols according to a standardized warm-up procedure

Undergo pre- and post-exercise assessments, including:

Proprioception (measured with an isokinetic device)

Muscle strength (measured with an isokinetic device)

Balance (measured with a Y balance test and BESS balance test)

Explosive power (measured with the Sargent Vertical Jump Test)

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

14 year–19 year

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Tümosan Konyaspor Facilities

Konya, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the acute effects of static stretching, dynamic stretching, and proprioceptive exercises on knee joint position sense (proprioception), muscle strength, balance, and explosive power in young male soccer players.

Proprioception, the ability to sense the position and movement of joints, muscles, and tendons, plays a critical role in maintaining joint stability. Proprioceptive exercises are widely used among athletes to enhance performance and reduce injury risk. Stretching exercises, particularly static and dynamic techniques, are commonly integrated into warm-up routines to improve flexibility, joint range of motion, and neuromuscular function. However, direct comparisons of the acute effects of static stretching, dynamic stretching, and proprioceptive exercises remain limited.

In this study, healthy male soccer players aged 14-19 years, with at least five years of competitive experience, no knee pain in the past two months, and no history of knee surgery, will be included. Participants will be randomly assigned (block randomization) into three groups:

Static Stretching Group - A controlled-position protocol targeting the quadriceps, hamstrings, plantar flexors, and dorsiflexors, with specific hold durations.

Dynamic Stretching Group - A repetitive movement protocol for the same muscle groups, with gradual speed increases.

Proprioceptive Exercise Group - A 10-exercise proprioceptive training program performed on a BOSU ball, focusing on lower-limb awareness, postural control, and dynamic balance.

All groups will perform a standardized 10-minute warm-up on a cycle ergometer before their respective protocols.

Assessments will be conducted before and immediately after the intervention:

Knee joint position sense (proprioception) - measured with an ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer

Muscle strength - isokinetic testing of knee flexors and extensors using the isokinetic device

Static balance - Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) test

Dynamic balance - Y-Balance Test

Explosive power - Sargent Vertical Jump Test

The primary hypothesis is that proprioceptive exercises will produce greater acute improvements in proprioception, balance, and explosive power, while dynamic stretching may yield higher acute gains in muscle strength. Findings from this study are expected to inform evidence-based warm-up and training strategies for young soccer players.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Playing football for at least 5 years.
  • Not experiencing knee pain for the last 2 months.
  • No history of knee surgery.
  • Practicing for 90 minutes at least 5 days a week.
  • Volunteering to participate in the study.
  • Being between 14 and 19 years old.

Exclusion criteria

  • Having experienced knee pain for the last two months.
  • Having had knee surgery.
  • Not willing to participate.

Treatment and study plan

Static Stretching Exercise Group

Other

Our exercise group where we applied the static stretching protocol

Other names: SG

Dynamic Stretching Exercise Group

Other

Our exercise group where we applied the dynamic stretching protocol

Other names: DG

Proprioceptive Exercise Group

Other

Proprioceptive Exercise Program

Other names: PG

Primary outcomes

  1. Knee Joint Position Sense Error (degrees)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 day

    Angular joint position matching error (degrees) measured using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer with passive reproduction of target angles.

  2. Peak Torque during Knee Extension (Nm)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 day

    Peak torque (Nm) during knee extension assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Peak Torque during Knee Flexion (Nm)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 day

    Peak torque (Nm) during knee flexion assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s.

  2. Total Work during Knee Extension (J)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 day

    Total work (J) produced during knee extension assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s.

  3. Total Work during Knee Flexion (J)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 day

    Total work (J) produced during knee flexion assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s.

  4. Average Work during Knee Extension (J)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 day

    Average work (J) during knee extension assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s.

  5. Average Work during Knee Flexion (J)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 day

    Average work (J) during knee flexion assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s.

  6. Maximum Work during Knee Extension (J)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 day

    Maximum work (J) during knee extension assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s.

  7. Maximum Work during Knee Flexion (J)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 day

    Maximum work (J) during knee flexion assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s.

  8. Average Power during Knee Extension (W)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 day

    Average power (W) during knee extension assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s.

  9. Average Power during Knee Flexion (W)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 day

    verage power (W) during knee flexion assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s.

  10. Knee Joint Angle at Peak Torque during Extension (degrees)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 day

    The knee joint angle (degrees) at which peak torque occurs during knee extension, assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s.

  11. Knee Joint Angle at Peak Torque during Flexion (degrees)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 day

    The knee joint angle (degrees) at which peak torque occurs during knee flexion, assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s.

  12. Y Balance Test Composite Score (percent)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 day

    Dynamic balance performance evaluated using the normalized composite reach score from the Y Balance Test (percent).

  13. BESS Total Error Score (points)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 day

    Static balance performance measured using the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS); higher scores indicate worse balance.

  14. Vertical Jump Height (cm) - Sargent Test

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 day

    Explosive lower-limb power measured using the Sargent Vertical Jump Test (cm).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Konya Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of the Acute Effects of Static Stretching, Dynamic Stretching, and Proprioceptive Exercises on Proprioception, Muscle Strength, Balance, and Explosive Power: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Acronym: SSDSPE-RCT

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jan 6, 2026
Registry last updated
Jan 6, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.