Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT03735667

ACURATE IDE: Safety and Effectiveness Study of ACURATE Valve for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

To evaluate safety and effectiveness of the ACURATE Transfemoral Aortic Valve System for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in subjects with severe native aortic stenosis who are indicated for TAVR.

As of 28-May-2025, Boston Scientific Corporation (BSC) announced the voluntary global discontinuation of the ACURATE product platform, including both the ACURATE neo2 and ACURATE Prime Aortic Valve Systems. BSC will no longer pursue regulatory approval for the device in the U.S. or other unapproved geographies.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Royal Columbian Hospital, New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Subjects will be enrolled at up to 85 centers in the United States, Canada, Europe, and Australia. There will be up to 2,820 subjects in ACURATE IDE.

The ACURATE IDE study cohorts include the following.

  • Main Randomized Cohort: A prospective, multicenter, 1:1 randomized controlled trial (RCT; ACURATE versus a commercially available balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3™ Transcatheter Heart Valve or future iteration [SAPIEN 3; Edwards Lifesciences LLC, Irvine, CA, USA] or a commercially available self-expanding CoreValve® Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement System, CoreValve® Evolut™ R Recapturable TAVR System, EVOLUT™ PRO System, or future iteration [CoreValve; Medtronic, Inc., Dublin, Ireland]). There will be up to 1,500 subjects in the RCT.
  • Roll-In Cohort: A non-randomized roll-in phase with the test device. Centers that do not have implantation experience with the ACURATE neo™ Aortic Bioprosthesis (transfemoral delivery; Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA, USA) will perform at least 2 roll-in cases before commencing treatment in the randomized cohort. Centers with prior experience with ACURATE are not required to do roll-in cases. Data from roll-in subjects will be summarized separately from the randomized cohort and will not be included in the primary endpoint analysis.
  • 4D CT Imaging Substudy: Selected centers with the ability to perform high quality 4D computer tomography (CT) scans will include subjects in a 4D CT Imaging Substudy to assess the prevalence of reduced leaflet mobility and hypoattenuated leaflet thickening (HALT) and the relationship, if any, to clinical events. Subjects will be randomized to test (ACURATE) and control device.
  • ACURATE Prime™ XL Nested Registry: A non-randomized, nested registry cohort of subjects who will receive the ACURATE Prime™ Transfemoral Aortic Valve System XL (ACURATE Prime XL Nested Registry). Participating centers will be a subset of United States centers that have enrolled subjects in ACURATE IDE. Data from subjects in this nested registry will be summarized separately from the randomized and roll-in cohorts.
  • ACURATE Extended Durability Study: An additional 1:1 randomized study (ACURATE versus a commercially available balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3™ Transcatheter Heart Valve or future iteration [SAPIEN 3; Edwards Lifesciences LLC, Irvine, CA, USA] or a commercially available self-expanding CoreValve® Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement System, CoreValve® Evolut™ R Recapturable TAVR System, EVOLUT™ PRO System, or future iteration [CoreValve; Medtronic, Inc., Dublin, Ireland]) including only subjects considered to be at low surgical risk. Subjects will receive ACURATE neo2 (S, M, or L valve sizes) or ACURATE Prime XL. Data from subjects in the Extended Durability Study will be summarized separately from other cohorts.
  • ACURATE Continued Access Study (CAS): An additional cohort of subjects receiving ACURATE neo2 (S, M, and L valve sizes) or ACURATE Prime XL. Data from subjects in the ACURATE CAS will be summarized separately from other cohorts and will be used to further assess performance and safety.

Follow-up

  • Subjects implanted with a test device will be assessed at baseline, peri- and post-procedure, at discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and then annually for 5 years post-procedure.
  • Subjects implanted with a control device will be assessed at baseline, peri- and post-procedure, at discharge or 7 days post procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post procedure. Per protocol, no additional follow-up is required beyond this period, and standard of care practices will apply.
  • Some subjects may have completed additional annual follow-up visits based on requirements outlined in earlier versions of the protocol.
  • Subjects who are enrolled but not implanted with a test or control device at the time of the procedure will be followed for safety through 1 year.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • IC1. Subject has documented severe symptomatic native aortic stenosis defined as follows: aortic valve area (AVA) ≤1.0 cm2 (or AVA index ≤0.6 cm2/m2) AND a mean pressure gradient ≥40 mmHg, OR maximal aortic valve velocity ≥4.0 m/s, OR Doppler velocity index ≤0.25 as measured by echocardiography and/or invasive hemodynamics.

Note: In cases of low flow, low gradient aortic stenosis with left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction <50%), dobutamine can be used to assess the grade of aortic stenosis (maximum dobutamine dose of 20 mcg/kg/min recommended); the subject may be enrolled if echocardiographic criteria are met with this augmentation.

  • IC2. Subject has a documented aortic annulus size of ≥20.5 mm and ≤29 mm based on the center's assessment of pre-procedure diagnostic imaging (and confirmed by the Case Review Committee [CRC]) and, for the Main Randomized Cohort and the Extended Durability Study, is deemed treatable with an available size of both test and control device.
  • IC3. For subjects with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis per IC1 definition above, functional status is NYHA Functional Class ≥ II.
  • IC4. Heart team (which must include an experienced cardiac interventionalist and an experienced cardiac surgeon) agrees that the subject is indicated for TAVR, is likely to benefit from valve replacement, and TAVR is appropriate.
  • IC5. Subject (or legal representative) understands the study requirements and the treatment procedures, and provides written informed consent.
  • IC6. Subject, family member, and/or legal representative agree(s) and subject is capable of returning to the study hospital for all required scheduled follow up visits.
  • IC7. Subject is expected to be able to take the protocol-required adjunctive pharmacologic therapy.

Exclusion criteria

  • EC1. Subject has a unicuspid or bicuspid aortic valve.
  • EC2. Subject has had an acute myocardial infarction within 30 days prior to the index procedure (defined as Q-wave MI or non-Q-wave MI with total CK elevation ≥ twice normal in the presence of CK-MB elevation and/or troponin elevation).
  • EC3. Subject has had a cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack clinically confirmed by a neurologist or neuroimaging within the past 6 months prior to study enrollment.
  • EC4. Subject is on renal replacement therapy or has eGFR <20.
  • EC5. Subject has a pre-existing prosthetic aortic or mitral valve.
  • EC6. Subject has severe (4+) aortic, tricuspid, or mitral regurgitation.
  • EC7. Subject has moderate or severe mitral stenosis (mitral valve area ≤1.5 cm2 and diastolic pressure half-time ≥150 ms, Stage C or D76).
  • EC8. Subject has a need for emergency surgery for any reason.
  • EC9. Subject has a history of endocarditis within 6 months of index procedure or evidence of an active systemic infection or sepsis.
  • EC10. Subject has echocardiographic evidence of new intra-cardiac vegetation or intraventricular or paravalvular thrombus requiring intervention.
  • EC11. Subject has platelet count <50,000 cells/mm3 or >700,000 cells/mm3, or white blood cell count <1,000 cells/mm3.
  • EC12. Subject has had a gastrointestinal bleed requiring hospitalization or transfusion within the past 3 months, or has other clinically significant bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy that would preclude treatment with required antiplatelet regimen, or will refuse transfusions.
  • EC13. Subject has known hypersensitivity to contrast agents that cannot be adequately pre-medicated, or has known hypersensitivity to the protocol required medications (aspirin, all P2Y12 inhibitors, heparin), or to the individual components of the test or control valve (nickel, titanium, stainless steel, platinum, iridium or polyethylene terephthalate [PET]).
  • EC14. Subject has a life expectancy of less than 12 months due to non-cardiac, comorbid conditions based on the assessment of the investigator at the time of enrollment.
  • EC15. Subject has hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
  • EC16. Subject has any therapeutic invasive cardiac or vascular procedure within 30 days prior to the index procedure (except for balloon aortic valvuloplasty, pacemaker implantation, or implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation, which are allowed).
  • EC17. Subject has untreated coronary artery disease, which in the opinion of the treating physician is clinically significant and requires revascularization.
  • EC18. Subject has severe left ventricular dysfunction with ejection fraction <20%.
  • EC19. Subject is in cardiogenic shock or has hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic support or mechanical support devices.
  • EC20. Subject has arterial access that is not acceptable for the study device (test or control) delivery systems as defined in the device (test or control) Directions For Use.
  • EC21. Subject has either of the following:
  • Severe vascular disease that would preclude safe access (e.g., aneurysm with thrombus that cannot be crossed safely; marked tortuosity; significant narrowing of the abdominal aorta; severe unfolding of the thoracic aorta; or thick, protruding, ulcerated atheroma in the aortic arch), OR
  • Severe/eccentric calcification of the aortic annulus that would prevent safe implantation of the TAVR prosthesis.
  • EC22. Subject has current problems with substance abuse (e.g., alcohol, etc.) that may interfere with the subject's participation in this study.
  • EC23. Subject is participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not reached its primary endpoint or subject intends to participate in another investigational device clinical trial within 12 months after index procedure.
  • EC24. Subject has untreated conduction system disorder (e.g., Type II second degree atrioventricular block) that in the opinion of the treating physician is clinically significant and requires a pacemaker implantation. Enrollment is permissible after permanent pacemaker implantation.
  • EC25. Subject has severe incapacitating dementia.

Additional exclusion criteria apply to subjects considered for enrollment in the CT Imaging Substudy as listed below.

  • AEC1. Subject has eGFR <30 mL/min (chronic kidney disease stage IV or stage V)
  • AEC2. Subject has atrial fibrillation that cannot be rate controlled to ventricular response rate < 60 bpm.
  • AEC3. Subject is expected to undergo chronic anticoagulation therapy after the index procedure.

Note: Subjects treated with short-term anticoagulation post procedure can be included in the CT Imaging Substudy; in these subjects the 30-day imaging will be performed 30 days after discontinuation of anticoagulation.

Treatment and study plan

ACURATE neo2™ Transfemoral TAVR System

Device

ACURATE neo2™ Transfemoral TAVR system: Support frame made of nitinol, supra-annular processed tri-leaflet porcine pericardial valve and an outer skirt to limit paravalvular regurgitation (manufactured by Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA, USA).

Medtronic CoreValve TAVR System

Device

Medtronic CoreValve Evolut R or Evolut PRO Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) System (or any future Corevalve iterations): The support frame is manufactured from nitinol, which has multilevel, self-expanding properties and is radiopaque. The bioprosthesis is manufactured by suturing valve leaflets and a skirt from porcine pericardium into a tri-leaflet configuration (manufactured by Medtronic CoreValve LLC, Santa Ana, USA).

Edwards SAPIEN 3 TAVR System

Device

Edwards SAPIEN 3 TAVR system (or any future SAPIEN iterations): balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic bioprosthesis, support frame made of cobalt-chromium, three leaflets constructed of processed bovine pericardial tissue and an outer polyethylene terephthalate (PET) sealing cuff to mitigate paravalvular regurgitation (manufactured by Edwards Lifesciences, Inc., Irvine, California, USA)

ACURATE Prime™ Transfemoral TAVR System XL

Device

ACURATE Prime™ Transfemoral TAVR system: Support frame made of nitinol, supra-annular processed tri-leaflet porcine pericardial valve and an outer skirt to limit paravalvular regurgitation (manufactured by Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA, USA).

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite Rate of All-cause Mortality, All Stroke, and Rehospitalization* at 1 Year in the Main Randomized Cohort.

    Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay through 1 year.

    Primary Endpoint: A Clinical Events Committee (CEC), independent group of physician experts reviewed and adjudicated all reported cases of death, stroke and rehospitalization to determine whether they met the specific protocol definition of the event. The CEC adjudicated results are used in the endpoint analysis.

    • Hospitalization for valve-related symptoms or worsening congestive heart failure (NYHA class III or IV); per VARC-2 definition.

Other outcomes

  1. Rate of Mortality: All-cause, Cardiovascular, and Non-cardiovascular

    Time frame: Participants will be followed peri- and post-procedure, at discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 Days, 6 Months, and 1 Year. Data for 2-10 years will be posted once data is complete.

    Safety outcome adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC-2 endpoints and definition.

  2. Rate of All Stroke: Disabling and Non-disabling

    Time frame: Participants will be followed peri- and post-procedure, at discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 Days, 6 Months, and 1 Year. Data for 2-10 years will be posted once data is complete.

    Safety outcome adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC-2 endpoints and definition.

  3. Rate of Myocardial Infarction (MI): Periprocedural (≤72 Hours Post Index Procedure) and Spontaneous (>72 Hours Post Index Procedure)

    Time frame: Participants will be followed peri- and post-procedure, at discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 Days, 6 Months, and 1 Year. Data for 2-10 years will be posted once data is complete.

    Safety outcome adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC-2 endpoints and definitions.

  4. Rate of Bleeding: Life-threatening (or Disabling) and Major

    Time frame: Participants will be followed peri- and post-procedure, at discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 Days, 6 Months, and 1 Year. Data for 2-5 years will be posted once data is complete.

    Safety outcome adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC-2 endpoints and definitions.

  5. Rate of Major Vascular Complications

    Time frame: Participants will be followed peri- and post-procedure, at discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 Days, 6 Months, and 1 Year. Data for 2-5 years will be posted once data is complete.

    Safety outcome adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC-2 endpoints and definitions.

  6. Rate of Repeat Procedure for Valve-related Dysfunction (Surgical or Interventional Therapy)

    Time frame: Participants will be followed peri- and post-procedure, at discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 Days, 6 Months, and 1 Year. Data for 2-10 years will be posted once data is complete.

    Safety outcome adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC-2 endpoints and definitions.

  7. Rate of Hospitalization for Valve-related Symptoms or Worsening Congestive Heart Failure (NYHA Class III or IV)

    Time frame: Participants will be followed peri- and post-procedure, at discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 Days, 6 Months, and 1 Year. Data for 2-10 years will be posted once data is complete.

    Safety outcome adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC-2 endpoints and definitions.

  8. Rate of New Permanent Pacemaker Implantation (PPI) Resulting From New or Worsened Conduction Disturbances

    Time frame: Participants will be followed peri- and post-procedure, at discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 Days, 6 Months, and 1 Year. Data for 2-10 years will be posted once data is complete.

    Safety outcome adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC-2 endpoints and definitions.

  9. Rate of New Onset of Atrial Fibrillation or Atrial Flutter

    Time frame: Participants will be followed peri- and post-procedure, at discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 Days, 6 Months, and 1 Year. Data for 2-10 years will be posted once data is complete.

    Safety outcome adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC-2 endpoints and definitions.

  10. Rate of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI; ≤7 Days Post Index Procedure): Based on the AKIN System Stage 3 (Including Renal Replacement Therapy) or Stage 2

    Time frame: Participants will be followed peri- and post-procedure, through 7 days post index procedure.

    Safety outcome adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC-2 endpoints and definitions.

  11. Rate of Coronary Obstruction: Periprocedural

    Time frame: Participants will be followed through 72 hours post index procedure

    Safety outcome adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) - based on VARC endpoints and definitions.

  12. Rate of Ventricular Septal Perforation: Periprocedural

    Time frame: Participants will be followed through 72 hours post index procedure

    Safety outcome adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC-2 endpoints and definitions.

  13. Rate of Mitral Apparatus Damage: Periprocedural

    Time frame: Participants will be followed through 72 hours post index procedure

    Safety outcome adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC-2 endpoints and definitions.

  14. Rate of Cardiac Tamponade: Periprocedural

    Time frame: Participants will be followed through 72 hours post index procedure

    Safety outcome adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC-2 endpoints and definitions.

  15. Rate of Valve Migration

    Time frame: Participants will be followed peri- and post-procedure, at discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 Days, 6 Months, and 1 Year. Data for 2-10 years will be posted once data is complete.

    Safety outcome adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC-2 endpoints and definitions.

  16. Rate of Valve Embolization

    Time frame: Participants will be followed peri- and post-procedure, at discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 Days, 6 Months, and 1 Year. Data for 2-10 years will be posted once data is complete.

    Safety outcome adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC-2 endpoints and definitions.

  17. Rate of Ectopic Valve Deployment

    Time frame: Participants will be followed peri- and post-procedure through discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first).

    Safety outcome adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC-2 endpoints and definitions.

  18. Rate of Transcatheter Aortic Valve (TAV)-In-TAV Deployment

    Time frame: Participants will be followed peri- and post-procedure, at discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 Days, 6 Months, and 1 Year. Data for 2-10 years will be posted once data is complete.

    Safety outcome adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC-2 endpoints and definitions.

  19. Rate of Prosthetic Aortic Valve Thrombosis

    Time frame: Participants will be followed peri- and post-procedure, at discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 Days, 6 Months, and 1 Year. Data for 2-10 years will be posted once data is complete.

    Safety outcome adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC-2 endpoints and definitions.

  20. Rate of Prosthetic Aortic Valve Endocarditis

    Time frame: Participants will be followed peri- and post-procedure, at discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 Days, 6 Months, and 1 Year. Data for 2-10 years will be posted once data is complete.

    Safety outcome adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC-2 endpoints and definitions.

  21. Rate of Successful Vascular Access, Delivery and Deployment of the Study Valve, and Successful Retrieval of the Delivery System (Site Reported Assessment)

    Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of their procedure, an expected average of 1 Day (peri- and post-procedure)

    Device Performance outcome, as measured by site reported data based on VARC-2 endpoints and definitions.

  22. Grade of Aortic Valve Regurgitation: Paravalvular, Central and Combined (Echocardiographic Assessment)

    Time frame: Participants will be assessed pre-procedure, at discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 Days, 6 Months, and 1 Year. Data for 2-5 years, 7 years, and 10 years will be posted once data is complete.

    Grade of Aortic Regurgitation as measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and assessed by an independent core laboratory.

  23. Rate of Device Success

    Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of their procedure, an expected average of 1 Day (post-procedure)

    Absence of procedural mortality, correct positioning of a single transcatheter valve in the proper anatomical location, and intended performance of the study device (indexed effective orifice area [iEOA] >0.85 cm2/m2 for BMI <30 kg/cm2 and iEOA >0.70 cm2/m2 for BMI ≥30 kg/cm2 plus either a mean aortic valve gradient <20 mmHg or a peak velocity < 3m, and no moderate or severe prosthetic valve aortic regurgitation) based on VARC-2 endpoints and definitions.

  24. Effective Orifice Area (EOA)

    Time frame: Participants will be assessed pre-procedure, at discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 Days, 6 Months, and 1 Year. Data for 2-5 years, 7 years, and 10 years will be posted once data is complete.

    Effective Orifice Area (EOA), as measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and assessed by an independent core laboratory

  25. Mean Aortic Gradient

    Time frame: Participants will be assessed pre-procedure, at discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 Days, 6 Months, and 1 Year. Data for 2-5 years, 7 years, and 10 years will be posted once data is complete.

    Mean Aortic Gradient as measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and assessed by an independent core laboratory.

  26. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Status Classification

    Time frame: Participants will be followed peri- and post-procedure, at discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 Days, 6 Months, and 1 Year. Data for 2-5 years, 7 years, and 10 years will be posted once data is complete.

    Health status evaluated by New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification.

    NYHA Classification:

    Class I: Subjects with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity.

    Class I: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity.

    Class III: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity.

    Class IV: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort.

  27. Health Status: Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Quality of Life Assessment - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Participants will be assessed at baseline, 30 Days, and 1 Year. Data for 5 years will be posted once data is complete.

    Health Status additional outcome KCCQ Analysis - Overall Summary Score change from Baseline.

    Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ): Quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.

    Overall Summary Score - mean of score 1, 5, 7, and 8

  28. Health Status: SF-12 Quality of Life Questionnaire Assessment - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Participants will be assessed at baseline, 30 Days, and 1 Year. Data for 5 years will be posted once data is complete.

    Health Status outcome - SF-12 - Baseline scores and changes from Baseline at 30 Days and 1 Year.

    12 Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12): Measures functional health and well-being. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Boston Scientific Corporation

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

ACURATE IDE: Transcatheter Replacement of Stenotic Aortic Valve Through Implantation of ACURATE in Subjects InDicatEd for TAVR

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2029
First posted
Nov 8, 2018
Registry last updated
May 4, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.