Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital
Monastir, Monastir Governorate, 5000, Tunisia
NCT Number: NCT02781415
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy and safety profiles of a 30 minutes acupuncture session performed at an ER of a tertiary hospital versus titrated intravenous morphine in the management of acute severe pain syndromes (defined as a visual analogue scale (VAS) score >/= 70) taking for example acute renal colic.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Monastir, Monastir Governorate, 5000, Tunisia
acupuncture session performed at an ER of a tertiary hospital versus titrated intravenous morphine in the management of acute severe pain syndromes (defined as a visual analogue scale (VAS) score >/= 70) taking for example acute renal colic.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Skin disinfection was made by an antiseptic solution in the sites of insertion and sterile acupuncture needles were used (0.25 x 0.5 mm).
Patients were installed in a seated position and needles were inserted perpendicularly through the skin to a depth of 1 - 2 cm until the "De Qi" was achieved.
The "DeQi" corresponds to a feeling of numbness and tingling within the range of acupoint, The insertion sites are represented by the urinary bladder meridian points to the side of the pain (UB21, UB22, UB23, UB24, UB26, UB45, UB46, UB47, UB48 and UB49).
Morphine was previously prepared by a study nurse by diluting a 10 mg / 1 ml flakon of morphine chlorhydrate in a 9 ml solution of serum saline to obtain a 10 ml preparation (1 ml = 1 mg).
An initial bolus of 0.1 mg per Kg of actual body weight of morphine chlorhydrate solution is administered.
A titration dose of 0.1 mg / Kg of body weight was repeated every 5 minutes' interval until reaching the therapeutic goal.
Time frame: at baseline and 10, 20, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after the start of intervention
Pain score is measured by a 100 millimeter visual analogue scale (VAS) and corresponds to the severity of the pain felt by the patient and varying from 0 (corresponding to no pain) to 100 (corresponding to the maximum imaginable pain).
Time frame: during the 1 hour protocol and up to 2 hours after
Corresponds to the occurence of side effects related to the intervention. Side effects occurence is evaluated via a checklist for each study group and the degree of amputability is evaluated via a 3 point likert scale (1: not probable, 2: probable and 3 : very probable / almost certain).
In the morphine group we followed patients for the occurence of drowsiness, dizziness, nausea and vomiting, respiratory distress and hypotension.
In the acupuncture group we followed patients for the occurence of local rush / bleeding / itching, needle blockage and fainting
University of Monastir
Other
Comparison of Acupuncture and Titrated (TM) Morphine in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Room (ER) With Acute Renal Colic (RC)
Acronym: AcuRC
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04490343
Calculi, Deep Learning Reconstruction
Amiens, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05323175
Neurologic Manifestations, Pain
Stony Brook, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06982430
Disease Attributes, Emergencies
Monastir, Tunisia
View Trial DetailsNCT07386288
Disease Attributes, Emergencies
Yakutiye, Erzurum, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details