acupuncture
DeviceAcupuncture will be applied according to the standards for reporting interventions in clinical trials of acupuncture (STRICTA)
NCT Number: NCT02152410
Renal colics are a common cause af acute intense pain in medical emergency settings requiring often the use of high level antalgics (opioid) to relief the patient.
In the other hand, Acupuncture is well known widely for its therapeutic characteristics, especially in relieving pain.
the aim of these study is to compare this two pain relieving techniques in patients consulting the emergency departement (ED) for acute onset renal colics.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Early Phase 1
Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, Monastir, Monastir Governorate, Tunisia
acute onset pain is a frequent cause for consulting the ED (2/3 of patients). renal colics are a common cause for severe acute onset pain, we think approximatively 20% of patients consulting the ED for severe (VAS > 70) acute onset pain have renal colics (RC).
the guidelines for the treatment of severe RC recommend the association of two drugs: a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent (NSAI) typically the Ketoprofen and an antalgic typically opioid (Morphine).
but this one face many critics regarding its safety and tolerance, that's why we investigated other pain relief strategies such as acupuncture.
acupuncture is one of the five branches of the traditional chinese medicine, it has proven its efficacity and safety in many conditions and in RC.
the aim of these study is to assess the feasibility, the safety, and the tolerance of an acupuncture pain-relief strategy compared to the conventional one (intravenous opioids) in the treatment of severe acute onset RC in emergency departement settings.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Acupuncture will be applied according to the standards for reporting interventions in clinical trials of acupuncture (STRICTA)
bolus of 5 mg of morphine (5 cc) and 2 mg (2cc) every 10 minutes if no improvement of VAS (VAS> 30).
Time frame: at baseline, 10, 20, 30, 45 and 60 minutes
the primary outcome is to assess the efficacity of acupuncture versus IV morphine expressed in VAS reduction during treatment.
if there is a reduction of more than 50% of the baseline VAS, than the treatment is considered efficient.
Time frame: during the 60 minutes of the treatment
during the 60 minutes of the treatment, we checked the patient for side effects:
Time frame: at baseline
we calculated the number of patients that accepted the acupuncture treatment versus patient with conventional treatment
University of Monastir
Other
Comparison of Two Antalgic Strategies: Acupuncture Versus Intravenous Morphine in the Management of Acute Pain in Emergency Departement. A Randomized Trial of Efficacy and Safety
Acronym: AcuMoPE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04490343
Calculi, Deep Learning Reconstruction
Amiens, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05323175
Neurologic Manifestations, Pain
Stony Brook, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06982430
Disease Attributes, Emergencies
Monastir, Tunisia
View Trial DetailsNCT07386288
Disease Attributes, Emergencies
Yakutiye, Erzurum, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details