Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901, United States
NCT Number: NCT02959840
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of acupressure point P6 stimulation versus intravenous ondansetron plus metoclopramide versus no antiemetic prophylaxis during elective cesarean section under regional anesthesia.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–45 year
Female
Interventional
Phase 4
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901, United States
The design of the study consists of the randomization of subjects undergoing cesarean section with regional anesthesia in one of three groups. The study is not blinded; as the participants will know which method they are being treated with because of the difference in site and nature of the acupuncture point P6 stimulation. The randomization of patients will be done by a computer to avoid bias before the informed consent form (ICF) is signed by the patients. The computer will generate three sets of random numbers for the three groups. Once the consent form is signed, the investigator will allocate the patients serially to the groups having those numbers . The randomization will be created before the study begins and will assign 180 subjects into one of the three groups to receive the treatment as follows:
Group I (n=60): Will be the control group patients and will not be given traditional medical therapy nor will receive acupuncture point P6 stimulation prior to administration of the standardized epidural anesthesia, as outlined below.
Group II (n=60): Will receive traditional medical management, consisting of 10 mg metoclopramide IV and 8 mg of ondansetron IV immediately prior to administration of the standardized regional anesthesia, as outlined below.
Group III (n=60): Will receive acupuncture point P6 stimulation. This is a stimulation of the chi channel at the master of the heart (MH8 position) at the small depression of the volar surface of the distal right forearm just above the crest of the wrist. The device will be put on the patients in the operating room prior to administration of the regional anesthesia and will be removed after the cesarean section is complete. The device will be removed from the patient in the operating room, before the patient is transported to the recovery room. Patients will receive continuous stimulation at a level that is comfortable for the patient prior to administration of the standardized regional anesthesia, as outlined below.
After the subjects have been randomly assigned to one of the three groups, subjects will receive the standardized regional anesthesia consisting of 2 milliliters (10 milligrams) of 0.5% bupivicaine and 20 micrograms of fentanyl and 100 micrograms of epinephrine. Patients will offer their subjective assessments of the level of nausea on a scale of 0-10 (0 = no nausea, 10 = worst nausea every experienced).
An Apfel score, which is used to predict the risk of experiencing post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), will also be determined with each subject.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
This device stimulates the chi channel at the master of the heart (MH8 position) at the small depression of the volar surface of the distal right forearm just above the crest of the wrist. The device is placed on patients in the operating room prior to administration of the regional anesthesia and will be removed after the cesarean section is complete. The device is removed from the patient in the operating room, before the patient is transported to the recovery room. Patients receive continuous stimulation at a level that is comfortable for the patient prior to administration of the standardized regional anesthesia.
10 mg Reglan IV immediately prior to administration of the standardized regional anesthesia.
Other names: Reglan
8 mg of Zofran IV immediately prior to administration of the standardized regional anesthesia.
Other names: Zofran
Time frame: During the surgical procedure
The investigators will analyze if there is a statistically significant difference between the number of patients that experience nausea at any point during the surgical procedure in each group.
Time frame: During the surgical procedure
The investigators will perform objective assessments of whether or not the patients have vomited during the procedure. The investigators will then analyze if there is a statistically significant difference between the number of patients that vomit in each group.
Time frame: During the surgical procedure
Patients offer their subjective assessments of the level of nausea on a scale of 0-10 (0 = no nausea, 10 = worst nausea ever experienced) during stage I. The investigators will analyze if there is a statistically significant difference between the number of patients that experience nausea in each group at this point. Patients that report nausea (1 or more on our scale) will be recorded as that they have experienced nausea.
Time frame: During the surgical procedure
Patients offer their subjective assessments of the level of nausea on a scale of 0-10 (0 = no nausea, 10 = worst nausea ever experienced) during stage II. The investigators will analyze if there is a statistically significant difference between the number of patients that experience nausea in each group at this point. Patients that report nausea (1 or more on our scale) will be recorded as that they have experienced nausea.
Time frame: During the surgical procedure
Patients offer their subjective assessments of the level of nausea on a scale of 0-10 (0 = no nausea, 10 = worst nausea ever experienced) during stage III. The investigators will analyze if there is a statistically significant difference between the number of patients that experience nausea in each group at this point. Patients that report nausea (1 or more on our scale) will be recorded as that they have experienced nausea.
Time frame: During the surgical procedure
Patients offer their subjective assessments of the level of nausea on a scale of 0-10 (0 = no nausea, 10 = worst nausea ever experienced) during stage IV. The investigators will analyze if there is a statistically significant difference between the number of patients that experience nausea in each group at this point. Patients that report nausea (1 or more on our scale) will be recorded as that they have experienced nausea.
Time frame: During the surgical procedure
The investigators will perform objective assessments of whether or not the patients have vomited during stage I. The investigators will then analyze if there is a statistically significant difference between the number of patients that vomit in each group.
Time frame: During the surgical procedure
The investigators will perform objective assessments of whether or not the patients have vomited during stage II. The investigators will then analyze if there is a statistically significant difference between the number of patients that vomit in each group.
Time frame: During the surgical procedure
The investigators will perform objective assessments of whether or not the patients have vomited during stage III. The investigators will then analyze if there is a statistically significant difference between the number of patients that vomit in each group.
Time frame: During the surgical procedure
The investigators will perform objective assessments of whether or not the patients have vomited during stage IV. The investigators will then analyze if there is a statistically significant difference between the number of patients that vomit in each group.
Time frame: During the surgical procedure
Patients are asked their anti-emetic treatment satisfaction (0 = Not Satisfied, 10 = Extremely Satisfied). Data are expressed as number of parturients who gave a score of 8 or higher.
Time frame: During the surgical procedure
Patients are asked their overall anesthetic care satisfaction (0 = Not Satisfied, 10 = Extremely Satisfied). Data are expressed as number of parturients who gave a score of 8 or higher.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Other
Is Intra-operative Acupuncture Point P6 Stimulation as Effective as Traditional Pharmacotherapy in Reducing Nausea and Vomiting During Cesarean Section With Regional Anesthesia?
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02960113
Behavior, Nausea
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02466984
Nausea, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Bordeaux, Aquitaine, France
View Trial DetailsNCT01440465
Cancer, Nausea
Avranches, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06439121
Nausea, Nausea, Postoperative
Yenimahalle, Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details