Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, 301617, China
NCT Number: NCT02195921
The purpose of this study is to clarify whether the matching acupoints is more effective than a single point by electroacupuncture in the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting .
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, 301617, China
Patients were assigned to Four sessions of electroacupuncture(EA) at the CV12, ST36, CV12+ST36 acupoints or antiemetic therapy over 5 days. primary and secondary outcomes and Adverse Eventswill be assessed.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
All participants were supine in the hospital bed. A disposable sterile acupuncture needle (ø 0.30 × 40 mm, Hwato) was inserted vertically at approximately 20-30 mm until "De Qi" (sensation of soreness, numbness, distension, etc. around the acupoint) was reported by the participants. Then, the needle handle was clamped via a metal clip to connect to the positive electrode of the electric acupuncture apparatus (Huatuo, SDZ-V model, Suzhou Medical Appliance). Another reference electrode was placed 1 cm above the CV12 acupoints of the stimulation point, where no acupoints or meridians passed through. A dilatational wave at a frequency of 2/10 Hz and a current intensity at the highest level tolerated by the patient, with a maximum intensity no more than 10 mA, were used to deliver the EA stimulation. People in the intervention groups were offered a standardized 30-minute EA session once daily from the 1st day of the four-day chemotherapy cycle.
A disposable sterile acupuncture needle (ø 0.30 × 40 mm, Hwato) was inserted vertically at approximately 20-30 mm until "De Qi" (sensation of soreness, numbness, distension, etc. around the acupoint) was reported by the participants. Then, the needle handle was clamped via a metal clip to connect to the positive electrode of the electric acupuncture apparatus (Huatuo, SDZ-V model, Suzhou Medical Appliance). Another reference electrode was placed 1cm below ST36 acupoints of the stimulation point, respectively, where no acupoints or meridians passed through. A dilatational wave at a frequency of 2/10 Hz and a current intensity at the highest level tolerated by the patient, with a maximum intensity no more than 10 mA, were used to deliver the EA stimulation. People in the intervention groups were offered a standardized 30-minute EA session once daily from the 1st day of the four-day chemotherapy cycle.
Stimulating both Zusanli(ST36)and Zhongwan(CV12)
received routine antiemetic treatment
Time frame: 5 days
Percentage of participants with nausea was assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no nausea) to 10 (worst nausea). A score of 0 means no nausea for a portion of the patient's assessment.
Time frame: 5 days
The number of times vomiting occurs after chemotherapy for each participant during 0-120 hours. The evaluator completed daily diaries for each time point.
Time frame: 5 days
The RINVR scale has 8 items . The scale divides the occurrence of nausea , vomiting , and retching within 12 hours of tumor chemotherapy patients into 5 grades , which are scored from 0 to 4 points . The lower the score , the better . The RINVR scale can be divided into three dimensions : symptom experience time , symptom frequency and symptom severity .
Time frame: 5 days
Rhodes Index of Nausea, Vomiting and Retching was replaced by percentage of participants with nausea (assessed by VAS) and number of times of vomiting occurs which were recorded in the first and second primary outcome.
Time frame: 5 days
The grading of constipation and diarrhea.We deleted this evaluation method due to weak correlation.
Time frame: 5 days
We deleted this evaluation method due to weak correlation.
Time frame: 5 days
Assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-General (FACT-G) .The FACT-G includes 27 items and is divided among 4 subscales: physical well-being (PWB), functional well-being (FWB), social/family well-being (SWB), and emotional well-being (EWB). The total FACT-G score ranges from 0 to 108 and is calculated by the sum of the subscales, with higher scores indicating greater functional status
Time frame: 5 days
Assessed by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS scale). It includes fourteen items, seven of which assess anxiety and the other seven assess depression (30). The total scores range from 0 to 21 for depression and anxiety, respectively, with higher scores indicating more depression and anxiety.
Time frame: 5 days
We deleted this evaluation method due to weak correlation.
Time frame: 5 days
We deleted this evaluation method due to weak correlation.
Time frame: 5 days
We deleted this evaluation method due to weak correlation.
Time frame: 5 days
Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Other
Acupuncture for Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: A Randomized Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07540169
Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting, Digestive System Diseases
Van, Tuşba, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06331520
Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting, Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT03354741
Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting, Children
Nice, France
View Trial DetailsNCT02106494
Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details