University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
NCT Number: NCT05412121
The goal of this pilot trial is to better understand if acupressure is feasible and tolerable to people with rheumatoid arthritis.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me25 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Adalimumab (Humira) Etanercept (Enbrel) Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) Golimumab (Simponi) Infliximab (Remicade)
Tofacitinib (Xeljanz) Baracitinib (Olumiant) Upadacitinib (Rinvoq)
o Rituximab (Rituxan)
Exclusion criteria
The MeTime Acupressure app will be loaded onto computer tablets or smart phones by the participants. Participants will also receive an AcuWand to be used in association with the acupressure app to help participants apply the correct amount of pressure to acupoints. There are 9 acupressure points, totaling 27 minutes of stimulation per day. Participants will perform daily acupressure for a total of six weeks.
In addition all participants will complete a battery of validated questionnaires before, during and after completion of treatment intervention.
Time frame: up to day 42 (during acupressure)
Feasibility of self-performed acupressure in patients with rheumatoid arthritis assessed by the number of study sessions completed by participants. Results reflect the number of participants who responded to all of the surveys administered at the Day 42 visit.
Time frame: Day 42 (during acupressure)
The Acupressure Tolerability Scale was comprised of 4 questions for participants to complete. Each question used a different scoring method, so the questions are reported as separate outcomes.
Question 1 asked whether participants were able to perform acupressure for the required time each day. Responses were on a 0-10 scale with 0 being 'not at all' and 10 being 'all of the time.'
Time frame: Day 42 (during acupressure)
The Acupressure Tolerability Scale was comprised of 4 questions for participants to complete. Each question used a different scoring method, so the questions are reported as separate outcomes.
Question 2 asked whether participants had to stop performing acupressure at any point during administration. Responses were on a 0-10 scale with 0 being 'not at all' and 10 being 'all of the time.'
Time frame: Day 42 (during acupressure)
The Acupressure Tolerability Scale was comprised of 4 questions for participants to complete. Each question used a different scoring method, so the questions are reported as separate outcomes.
Question 3 asked whether participants stopped acupressure because of pain in the hands. Responses could either be Yes or No. The results represent the number of participants who responded 'Yes' to this question.
Time frame: Day 42 (during acupressure)
The Acupressure Tolerability Scale was comprised of 4 questions for participants to complete. Each question used a different scoring method, so the questions are reported as separate outcomes.
Question 4 asked whether participants stopped acupressure because of pain at the acupoint, i.e., the place on the body where pressure was being applied. Responses could either be Yes or No. The results represent the number of participants who responded 'Yes' to this question.
Time frame: Baseline to Day 42
The fibromyalgia survey questionnaire comprises a measure of widespread body pain (0-19 points; one point per body location) and an assessment of comorbid symptoms (0-12 points including fatigue/depression/sleep/cognition) which are added together for a total possible score of 0-31 (0 being the lowest score, reflecting the least amount of pain and co-morbid symptoms; 31 being the highest score, reflecting the highest amount of pain and co-morbid symptoms captured on the scale). Scores are reported as a single composite score of the total number of points. A score of 13 or higher is needed for the Fibromyalgia diagnosis. This can arise from multiple combinations of the widespread pain and symptom severity scores. Results are an average of the participants' scores collected at baseline and at Day 42.
Time frame: Baseline to Day 42
The PROMIS-29 plus 2 Profile v2.1 is designed for adults ≥18 years of age and includes 29 items across the following domains: depression, anxiety, physical function, pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles and activities, cognitive function and pain intensity. This physical function subscale consists of 4 questions, which can result in a raw score of between 4 (reflecting lowest/worst physical functioning) and 20 (reflecting highest/best physical functioning).
Time frame: Baseline to Day 42
The PROMIS-29 plus 2 Profile v2.1 is designed for adults ≥18 years of age and includes 29 items across the following domains: depression, anxiety, physical function, pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles and activities, cognitive function, and pain intensity. This anxiety subscale consists of 4 questions, which can result in a raw score of between 4 (reflecting lowest anxiety) and 20 (reflecting highest anxiety).
Time frame: Baseline to Day 42
The PROMIS-29 plus 2 Profile v2.1 is designed for adults ≥18 years of age and includes 29 items across the following domains: depression, anxiety, physical function, pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles and activities, cognitive function and pain intensity. This depression subscale consists of 3 questions, which can result in a raw score of between 3 (reflecting lowest depression) and 15 (reflecting highest depression).
Time frame: Baseline to Day 42
The PROMIS-29 plus 2 Profile v2.1 is designed for adults ≥18 years of age and includes 29 items across the following domains: depression, anxiety, physical function, pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles and activities, cognitive function, and pain intensity. This fatigue subscale consists of 4 questions, which can result in a raw score of between 4 (reflecting lowest fatigue) and 20 (reflecting highest fatigue).
Time frame: Baseline to Day 42
The PROMIS-29 plus 2 Profile v2.1 is designed for adults ≥18 years of age and includes 29 items across the following domains: depression, anxiety, physical function, pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles and activities, cognitive function, and pain intensity. This sleep subscale consists of 4 questions, which can result in a raw score of between 4 (reflecting lower sleep disturbance and therefore better sleep quality) and 20 (reflecting highest sleep disturbance and therefore worse sleep quality).
Time frame: Baseline to Day 42
The PROMIS-29 plus 2 Profile v2.1 is designed for adults ≥18 years of age and includes 29 items across the following domains: depression, anxiety, physical function, pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles and activities, cognitive function, and pain intensity. This social participation subscale consists of 4 questions, which can result in a raw score of between 4 (reflecting lowest/worst ability to participate in social roles and activities) and 20 (reflecting highest/best ability to participate in social roles and activities).
Time frame: Baseline to Day 42
The PROMIS-29 plus 2 Profile v2.1 is designed for adults ≥18 years of age and includes 29 items across the following domains: depression, anxiety, physical function, pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles and activities, cognitive function, and pain intensity. This pain interference subscale consists of 4 questions, which can result in a raw score of between 4 (reflecting lowest pain interference) and 20 (reflecting highest pain interference).
Time frame: Baseline to Day 42
The PROMIS-29 plus 2 Profile v2.1 is designed for adults ≥18 years of age and includes 29 items across the following domains: depression, anxiety, physical function, pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles and activities, cognitive function. This cognitive function subscale consists of 2 questions, which can result in a raw score of between 2 (reflecting lowest/worst cognitive function) and 10 (reflecting highest/best cognitive function).
University of Michigan
Other
Feasibility and Acceptability of Acupressure in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03649178
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03025308
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07715045
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Palembang, South Sumatera, Indonesia
View Trial DetailsNCT00055055
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details