Ibn Haldun University Psychotherapy Application and Research Center (IPAM)
Istanbul, Basaksehir, 34480, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT06945796
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the accessibility and feasibility of an online group prevention program developed for women at risk for eating disorders. Also, to conduct a preliminary analysis of treatment efficacy. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does ACT-ED an acceptable intervention for women at risk for eating disorders? Does intervention result in reduced eating pathology?
Participants will:
Join the online, 4-session ACT-based group program Fill the measures at Pre-test, post-test and follow-up assessment
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Istanbul, Basaksehir, 34480, Turkey (Türkiye)
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
This intervention protocol was developed specifically for women who have body dissatisfaction and disordered eating behaviors. Based on the psychological flexibility model (hexaflex), it is designed to improve people's body image flexibility using Acceptance and Commitment Therapy techniques.
Interventions related to the dimensions of the hexaflex were made during each session. The first session covers values and goal setting. The second session includes creative hopelessness, acceptance, and self-compassion. The third session covers defusion and mindfulness. The last session focuses on self-as-context exercises and the combined use of skills for committed action.
Other names: ACT-ED
Time frame: Baseline (pretest), week 4(posttest), 1-month follow-up
Disordered eating is a risk factor for eating disorders. In a prevalence study conducted in Türkiye, individuals with EDE-Q scores of 3.03 and above were defined as a high-risk group (Deveci, 2020). In this study, EDE-Q scores were assessed for inclusion criteria during enrollment. Additionally, changes in EDE-Q scores are assessed at post-test and follow-up to assess treatment effect.
Time frame: Baseline (pretest), week 4(posttest), 1-month follow-up
A total score of the questionnaire can be in the range of 34 to 204 where total score lower than 110 represents no concern, a total score between 110 and 137 represents mild concern, a total score between 138 and 166 represents moderate concern, and a total score higher than 167 represent severe concern. In this study, EDE-Q scores were assessed for inclusion criteria during enrollment; participants scores of 110 and above are included. Additionally, changes in EDE-Q scores are assessed at post-test and follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline (pretest), week 4(posttest), 1-month follow-up
Body image flexibility (BIF) is a construct derived from the psychological flexibility model. BIF is defined as the capacity to experience perceptions, sensations, feelings, thoughts, and beliefs related to one's body without avoidance while acting in alignment with personal values. The BI-AAQ consists of 12 items; higher scores indicate lower BIF and increased body image inflexibility. In this study, this scale would be used to assess how one's relation with body image-related internal experiences changes after the prevention program.
Time frame: Baseline (pretest), week 4(posttest), 1-month follow-up
The AAQ-II is designed to assess psychological flexibility defined as the capacity to be in contact with the present moment, fully aware of one's thoughts, emotions, and sensations. Higher scores indicate decreased psychological flexibility and increased experiential avoidance. In this study, the scale was used to assess changes in the general psychological flexibility.
Time frame: Baseline (pretest), week 4(posttest), 1-month follow-up
Present moment awareness is one of the dimensions of the psychological flexibility model. It is defined as the ability to fully engage with the present moment. Higher scores indicate better present moment awareness. In future studies, it is desired to examine which dimension of the psychological flexibility model has an effect on the treatment outcome. In this study, FMI was used to test its suitability in measuring change in this intervention.
Time frame: Baseline (pretest), week 4(posttest), 1-month follow-up
Contextual Self is one of the dimensions of the psychological flexibility model. It is defined as one's ability to view himself with a broader perspective. Higher scores indicate improved contextual self. In future studies, it is desired to examine which dimension of the psychological flexibility model has an effect on the treatment outcome. In this study, SACS was used to test its suitability in measuring change in this intervention.
Time frame: Baseline (pretest), week 4(posttest), 1-month follow-up
Defusion is one of the dimensions of the psychological flexibility model. It is defined as one's ability to separate himself from his thoughts. Higher scores indicate fusion, which is the opposite of defusion. In future studies, it is desired to examine which dimension of the psychological flexibility model has an effect on the treatment outcome. In this study, SACS was used to test its suitability in measuring change in this intervention.
Time frame: Baseline (pretest), week 4(posttest), 1-month follow-up
Obsessive-compulsive personality disorder and borderline personality disorder are the most common personality disorders in eating disorders. PBQ is designed to assess dysfunctional personality beliefs, and higher scores on a subscale indicate stronger dysfunctional beliefs related to the corresponding personality.
In future studies, it is desired to examine how the personality beliefs are affected by the prevention program. In this study, PBQ-SF was used to test its suitability in measuring change in personality beliefs by this intervention.
Ibn Haldun University
Other
ACT-ED: ACT-Based Eating Disorder Prevention Program
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07600970
Eating Disorders, Eating Disorders Symptoms
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02624713
Body Weight, Eating Disorders Symptoms
View Trial DetailsNCT07295197
Eating Disorders, Eating Disorders Symptoms
Bologna, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT07617701
Athlete, Eating Disorder Prevention
Caen, Basse-Normandie, France
View Trial Details