Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06926686

Acellular Dermal Matrix vs Autologous Tarsus for Correction of Lower Eyelid Retraction

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of two promising implants in treatment of lower eyelid retraction in 40 patients. This condition often resulting from injury, surgical complications, or thyroid eye disease. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Which implant provides better long-term stability of the eyelid malposition?

Does one implant minimize complications and improve patient outcomes more effectively than the other?

This study will compare the use of donor sclera implants to a cellular dermal matrix to see if either offers superior results in terms of reducing graft shrinkage and improving eyelid positioning.

Participants will:

Undergo lower eyelid reconstruction surgery with one of the two implants.

Be monitored for postoperative outcomes, including eyelid position, recurrence rates, and complications over a follow-up period 6 months.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

About this study

The study aims to find the best way to surgically correct lower eyelid retraction, a condition where the lower eyelid droops, leading to eye dryness, irritation, and potential vision problems. This condition can arise from various causes like thyroid eye disease, complications from eyelid or eye socket surgeries, burns, or injuries. The goal of the study is to determine which "spacer" graft works best to lift the eyelid back into its correct position and provide long-lasting results.

Currently, there's no universally agreed-upon optimal spacer-graft for this condition. Surgeons at the department of Ophthalmology at Haukeland University Hospital are conducting a study to compare two promising spacer graft materials: acellular dermal matrix (Permacol), a processed tissue that encourages tissue regeneration, and autologous tarsus, tissue taken from the patient's own upper eyelid.

Forty patients needing surgery for lower eyelid retraction will be inculded in this study. They will be randomly assigned to receive either the Permacol graft or the autologous tarsus graft. The surgical procedure involves making an incision inside the lower eyelid, separating the retractors (muscles that pull the eyelid down), and inserting the chosen spacer graft between the tarsus (the eyelid's supporting structure) and the retractors. This lifts the eyelid to the correct position.

Patients will be followed up for six months after surgery. Doctors will measure the position of the eyelid, how well the eye closes, and signs of dryness or damage to the eye surface. Patients will also be asked about pain/discomfort, and satisfaction with the cosmetic outcome. The study will track any complications, such as infection or recurrence of the eyelid retraction.

The study will compare the two groups to see which graft provides better eyelid positioning, reduces symptoms, and has fewer complications. Statistical analysis will be used to determine if there are significant differences between the two treatment groups.

The results of this study will provide valuable information for surgeons treating lower eyelid retraction, helping them choose the most effective and safe graft material for their patients. The procedures will be performed by experienced surgeons at Haukeland University Hospital, ensuring patient safety. The study adheres to ethical guidelines, and patients will provide informed consent before participating.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients aged 18-75 years.
  • Grade 2 or higher lower eyelid retraction (according to the retraction grading scale).
  • Candidate for surgical correction due to functional or cosmetic reasons.
  • Willingness to participate and provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Active ocular or eyelid infection.
  • History of severe scarring or keloid formation.
  • Concurrent orbital or eyelid malignancies. Pregnancy or lactation. Uncontrolled systemic diseases (e.g., diabetes, immune disorders). Previous eyelid surgery on the affected eye.

Treatment and study plan

Autologous tarsus

Procedure

Surgical implantation of autologous tarsus to the lower eyelid

acellular dermal matrix

Procedure

Surgical implantation of acellular dermal matrix to the lower eyelid

Primary outcomes

  1. Medial reflex distance 2

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up.

    Number of patients with ≥ 1 mm reduction in medial reflex distance 2

Secondary outcomes

  1. Vertical eyelid aperture

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up.

    Number of patients with ≥ 1 mm reduction in vertical eyelid aperture

  2. Scleral show

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up.

    Number of patients with ≥ 1 mm reduction in scleral show

    .

  3. Lagophthalmos

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up.

    Number of patients with ≥ 1 mm reduction in lagophthalmos

    .

  4. Oxford staining scale

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up.

    Number of patients with ≥ 1 reduction in Oxford staining scale (objective assessment of keratopathy). Oxford staining scale range from 0-4, and a higher score mean a worse outcome.

    .

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Annette Morwena Hope, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+47 41164804

Hans Olav Ueland, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+4755975719

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Haukeland University Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Prospective Comparison of Acellular Dermal Matrix and Autologous Tarsus for Correction of Lower Eyelid Retraction

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2030
Study completion
2032
First posted
Apr 14, 2025
Registry last updated
Apr 17, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.