NCT Number: NCT02021279
ACell MatriStem Pelvic Floor Matrix Versus Native Tissue Repair, Comparative Study
The primary objective of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of MatriStem Pelvic Floor Matrix as compared to native tissue repair for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Patients are evaluated throughout a 3 year follow-up period.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
Female
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Primary location
Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Subject's leading edge of POP is at or beyond the hymen. At or beyond the hymen is defined as POP-Q scores of Ba ≥ 0 or Bp ≥ 0 or C ≥ 0 (for prolapse of the apical compartment alone) or C ≥ -½ total vaginal length (for a multi-compartment prolapse that includes the apical compartment).
- Subject is seeking surgical intervention for symptomatic POP, which is defined as experiencing symptoms of vaginal bulging or pelvic heaviness. Vaginal bulge or pelvic heaviness will be considered present if a subject responds "yes" (≥1) to PFDI-20, question 3.
- Subject or subject's legally authorized representative is willing to provide written informed consent.
- Subject is willing and able to comply with the follow-up regimen.
Exclusion criteria
- Subject has a known hypersensitivity to porcine-based materials (relevant to subjects in MatriStem Pelvic Floor Matrix Group only).
- Subject is pregnant or plans to become pregnant during the study.
- Subject has an active or chronic systemic infection including any gynecologic infection, urinary tract infection (UTI), or tissue necrosis.
- Subject has a known neurologic or medical condition affecting bladder function (e.g. multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, or stroke with residual neurologic deficit).
- Subject has chronic systemic pain syndrome (e.g. fibromyalgia, painful bladder syndrome).
- Subject has a systemic connective tissue disease (e.g., scleroderma, systemic lupus erythematous (SLE), Marfans syndrome, Ehlers Danhlos, collagenosis, polymyositis or polymyalgia rheumatica).
- Subject has uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM).
- Subject has a history of pelvic organ cancer (e.g. uterine, ovarian, bladder, or cervical).
- Subject has had prior or is currently undergoing radiation, laser therapy, or chemotherapy in the pelvic area.
- Subject has taken systemic steroids (within the last month), immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory treatment (within the last 3 months).
- Subject is seeking obliterative vaginal surgery as treatment for POP (colpoclesis).
- Subject is not able to conform to the modified dorsal lithotomy position.
- Subject is currently participating in or plans to participate in another device or drug study during this study.
- Subject is to planning to undergo concurrent surgical treatment of prolapse using mesh other than the MatriStem Pelvic Floor Matrix.
Treatment and study plan
native tissue repair
ProcedureOther names: suture repair
Primary outcomes
-
The safety and effectiveness of surgical success/failure.
Time frame: 3 years
The composite outcome of surgical success evaluates anatomic outcome, patient reported outcome, and no retreatment pelvic organ prolapse.
Secondary outcomes
-
The surgical success/failure based on an alternate definition of success.
Time frame: 3 years
A composite outcome of surgical success based on an alternate definition of anatomic success, patient reported outcome, and no retreatment for pelvic organ prolapse.
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Integra LifeSciences Corporation
Industry
Registry information
Official study title
Evaluation of the Use of Transvaginal Resorbable Biologic Mesh as Compared to Traditional Non-Mesh Surgical Repair for Treating Pelvic Floor Disorders
Important dates
- Study start
- 2014
- Primary completion
- 2021
- Study completion
- 2021
- First posted
- Dec 27, 2013
- Registry last updated
- Feb 8, 2022
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Vaginal Microbiota as a Decisive Factor in Vaginal Prosthetic Surgery
NCT02890498
Pathological Conditions, Anatomical, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Nîmes, France
View Trial DetailsPhysical Therapy Intervention for Pelvic Organ Prolapses
NCT06532292
Pathological Conditions, Anatomical, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsCross-Shaped Vaginal Pessary for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT07554651
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Dnipro, Ukraine
View Trial DetailsUnilateral Versus Bilateral High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Following vNOTES Hysterectomy for Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Prospective Study
NCT07552337
Pathological Conditions, Anatomical, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Diyarbakır, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details