Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02021279

ACell MatriStem Pelvic Floor Matrix Versus Native Tissue Repair, Comparative Study

The primary objective of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of MatriStem Pelvic Floor Matrix as compared to native tissue repair for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Patients are evaluated throughout a 3 year follow-up period.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject's leading edge of POP is at or beyond the hymen. At or beyond the hymen is defined as POP-Q scores of Ba ≥ 0 or Bp ≥ 0 or C ≥ 0 (for prolapse of the apical compartment alone) or C ≥ -½ total vaginal length (for a multi-compartment prolapse that includes the apical compartment).
  • Subject is seeking surgical intervention for symptomatic POP, which is defined as experiencing symptoms of vaginal bulging or pelvic heaviness. Vaginal bulge or pelvic heaviness will be considered present if a subject responds "yes" (≥1) to PFDI-20, question 3.
  • Subject or subject's legally authorized representative is willing to provide written informed consent.
  • Subject is willing and able to comply with the follow-up regimen.

Exclusion criteria

  • Subject has a known hypersensitivity to porcine-based materials (relevant to subjects in MatriStem Pelvic Floor Matrix Group only).
  • Subject is pregnant or plans to become pregnant during the study.
  • Subject has an active or chronic systemic infection including any gynecologic infection, urinary tract infection (UTI), or tissue necrosis.
  • Subject has a known neurologic or medical condition affecting bladder function (e.g. multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, or stroke with residual neurologic deficit).
  • Subject has chronic systemic pain syndrome (e.g. fibromyalgia, painful bladder syndrome).
  • Subject has a systemic connective tissue disease (e.g., scleroderma, systemic lupus erythematous (SLE), Marfans syndrome, Ehlers Danhlos, collagenosis, polymyositis or polymyalgia rheumatica).
  • Subject has uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM).
  • Subject has a history of pelvic organ cancer (e.g. uterine, ovarian, bladder, or cervical).
  • Subject has had prior or is currently undergoing radiation, laser therapy, or chemotherapy in the pelvic area.
  • Subject has taken systemic steroids (within the last month), immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory treatment (within the last 3 months).
  • Subject is seeking obliterative vaginal surgery as treatment for POP (colpoclesis).
  • Subject is not able to conform to the modified dorsal lithotomy position.
  • Subject is currently participating in or plans to participate in another device or drug study during this study.
  • Subject is to planning to undergo concurrent surgical treatment of prolapse using mesh other than the MatriStem Pelvic Floor Matrix.

Treatment and study plan

MatriStem Pelvic Floor Matrix

Device

native tissue repair

Procedure

Other names: suture repair

Primary outcomes

  1. The safety and effectiveness of surgical success/failure.

    Time frame: 3 years

    The composite outcome of surgical success evaluates anatomic outcome, patient reported outcome, and no retreatment pelvic organ prolapse.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The surgical success/failure based on an alternate definition of success.

    Time frame: 3 years

    A composite outcome of surgical success based on an alternate definition of anatomic success, patient reported outcome, and no retreatment for pelvic organ prolapse.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Integra LifeSciences Corporation

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluation of the Use of Transvaginal Resorbable Biologic Mesh as Compared to Traditional Non-Mesh Surgical Repair for Treating Pelvic Floor Disorders

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Dec 27, 2013
Registry last updated
Feb 8, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.