Accuracy of Acoustic Rainbow Monitoring (ARM) Sensor

The purpose of the study was to conduct a side by side comparison of the accuracy of the respiratory rate (RR) between our Acoustic Rainbow Monitoring (ARM) sensor and the Oridian Microcap Capnograph in healthy adults. Our hypothesis was that the ARM sensor would have comparable or a better performance than the capnograph.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Healthy

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Masimo Clinical Lab

Irvine, California, 92618, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

healthy adult volunteers

Exclusion criteria

under age of 18

Treatment and study plan

ARM sensor

Device

Acoustic Monitoring sensor that monitors respiratory rate

Other names: RAS-125c

Primary outcomes

Accuracy of Respiratory Rate determination

Time frame: 40 minutes

Accuracy is calculated using ARMS analysis

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Masimo Corporation

Industry

Registry information

Important dates

Study start: 2009
Primary completion: 2012
Study completion: 2012
First posted: Apr 24, 2017
Registry last updated: Oct 24, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.

Completed