Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02746549

Accuracy of 1.5 T Versus 3 T Magnetic Resonance Arterial Spin Labeling to Measure Renal Blood Flow

In this study we want to compare the accuracy of two methods to measure renal perfusion by MRI spin labelling technique: the first measurement done with the 1.5 T MRI versus the second one obtained with the 3.0 T MRI (Siemens MRI device).

Additionally we want to compare the changes of renal perfusion caused by physiological stress. The used stress test is the cold pressor test done at the forehead.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Clinical Research Unit, Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg

Erlangen, 91054, Germany

About this study

Magnetic resonance imaging based arterial spin labeling is a technique to measure renal blood flow. Renal perfusion measurement is an important tool to analyze renal function and to detect acute kidney injury. The perfusion measurement is based on two data acquisitions, one with a global inversion prepulse followed by one with a slice selective prepulse (FAIR). The prepulses lead to a labeling of blood water spins. In contrast to the global inversion prepulse, the slice selective inversion prepulse only labels the blood water spins inside the kidney but not the inflowing blood water spins. Subtraction of both images therefore reflects the local perfusion. A third image without the FAIR preparation pulse is measured to normalize the signal intensifiers on each patients.

MRI based arterial spin labeling is a noninvasive assessment not using contrast agents to measure the functional parameters of the kidney. This is avoiding serious complications such as acute kidney failure and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. There is no known negative impact to the patient. In addition we now want to analyze the validity of this MRI-technique by provoking acutely changes of renal plasma flow. As a further provocative maneuver we selected the cold pressor test as a physiological stress test. Forehead cooling activates the sympathetic nervous system and increases blood pressure and heart rate by causing pain. This mechanism has got an impact on renal haemodynamics. To minimize the possible cold injuries we use the 1°C ice water pack only for 60 seconds and avoid the contact to the eyes.

In this study we want to compare the accuracy of two methods to measure renal perfusion by MRI spin labelling technique: the first measurement done with the 1.5 T MRI versus the second one obtained with the 3.0 T MRI (Siemens MRI device).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male and Female patients are eligible. Females of child bearing potential (WOCBP) are only eligible if pregnancy test at the screening visit is negative and they use adequate contraceptive precautions during the trial.
  • Healthy volunteers and patients who have hypertension stage 1 or 2 or patients who have diabetes at a max of 2 oral antidiabetic agents will be included

Exclusion criteria

  • eGFR ≤ 45 ml/min/1.75m²
  • any cardiovascular or cerebrovascular other other severe events within the last 3 months
  • arterial hypertension grad > 2 ( blood pressure ≥ 180/110)
  • Subject who do not give written consent, that pseudonymous data will be transferred in line with the duty of documentation and the duty of notification according to § 12 and § 13 GCP-V
  • Any contraindications to MRI
  • Brain aneurysm clip
  • Implanted cardiac pacemaker, pacemaker wires or defibrillator
  • Prosthetic heart valves
  • Cochlear implant
  • Ocular foreign body
  • Implanted insulin pump,
  • Tattoo (as determined by imager)
  • agoraphobia

Treatment and study plan

renal perfusion

Other

measurement of renal perfusion with MRI arterial spin labelling technique

Primary outcomes

  1. Accuracy of 1.5 T versus 3 T magnetic resonance arterial spin labeling to measure renal perfusion (ml/min)

    Time frame: 2 weeks

    Renal function will be measured in ml/min by MRI arterial spin labelling technique.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical School

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized, Clinical Study to Compare Accuracy of 1.5 T Versus 3 T Magnetic Resonance Arterial Spin Labeling to Measure Renal Blood Flow and the Changes of Renal Perfusion Caused by Physiological Stress (Cold Pressor Test).

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Apr 21, 2016
Registry last updated
Mar 26, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.