Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05986929

Acceptability, Barriers and Facilitators of a Communication Tool in Hospital Settings

The presence of appropriate systems to promote good communication within the care team is one of the ten important characteristics identified for effective interdisciplinary work. However, the current communication systems at the Eastern Townships University Health and Social Services Centre of the Sherbrooke University Hospital (SUH), an hospital setting in Sherbrooke (Quebec, Canada), are numerous, scattered and difficult to identify quickly. The bedside magnetized posters were developed to address this issue. The use of this kind of tool should improve teamwork, communication, and patient care. As the bedside magnetized posters are now well established on the stroke and geriatric units at the SUH, it is essential to evaluate their acceptability by staff members. In addition, identifying the barriers and facilitators to their use will support the team for eventual deployment in other care environments at the SUH.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Communication, Multidisciplinary Behavior Communication

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

CIUSSS de l'Estrie CHUS

Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 5N4, Canada

About this study

The objectives of the study are:

  • To describe the acceptability of magnetic posters by staff members in the Neurology Department - Stroke Unit, where they are already well established, and in the Geriatric Department, where they are newly introduced.
  • To identify barriers and facilitators to the use of magnetic posters to assist the team in an eventual deployment in other care environments at SUH.

Methods

A mixed sequential design will be used (quantitative, qualitative and observational). The study population will be staff working with inpatients in the neurology-stroke and geriatric units of SUH. Staff meeting the eligibility criteria will be invited to complete an electronic survey on the acceptability of the magnetic posters. The survey will consist of 15 closed questions relating to the use of the magnetic posters (e.g. frequency of poster consultation) and its acceptability (e.g. ease of use, poster content), one open question to gather suggestions for improving the tool and 6 socio-demographic questions. The survey will take approximately 10-15 minutes to complete, and responses will be recorded on the Research Centre on Aging's RedCap server for later analysis.

Also, a member of the research team will carry out observations on the neurology-stroke and geriatric units for one half-day, in order to collect data concerning, among other things, how the posters are used (e.g. where are the posters available to staff, which posters are used) and the characteristics of the patients for whom the posters are used.

Finally, two semi-structured group interviews, one for the neurology-stroke unit and one for the geriatric unit, will be facilitated by a member of the research team. Each group will be made up of 6 to 8 employees from a variety of professions, in order to be representative of the population under study and will last 30-60 minutes. The focus groups will address the facilitators and barriers to poster use for each respective unit. Discussions will be recorded and verbatims will be kept for later analysis.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • adults aged 18 and over
  • employed by the SUH and working on stroke and geriatric units

Exclusion criteria

  • none

Treatment and study plan

Focus Group

Other

Two semi-structured group interviews, lasting 30-60 minutes, on facilitators and barriers to poster use by staff members (N=6-8).

Electronic Survey

Other

An electronic survey of 15 closed questions on the acceptability of the magnetic posters (N=100).

Primary outcomes

  1. Acceptability

    Time frame: From the time the participants begin the electronic survey to the time their answers are sent off (approx. 15 to 20 minutes). There are no cut-off points for this outcome

    questions on acceptability of the magnetic posters will be asked in the electronic survey

  2. Barriers and facilitators

    Time frame: This outcome will be measured during the participants' focus group, which should have a duration of approx. 60 minutes. There are no cut-off points for this outcome

    questions on barriers and facilitators to poster use will be asked during the focus group

Secondary outcomes

  1. Questionnaire on the use of the magnetic posters

    Time frame: This outcome will be measured during the observational half-day, which should have a duration of approx. 4 hours. There are no cut-off points for this outcome

    during the observational half-day, how the posters are used (where they are used and which posters are used) in the stroke and geriatric units will be collected

  2. Characteristics of the patients

    Time frame: This outcome will be measured during the observational half-day, which should have a duration of approx. 4 hours. There are no cut-off points for this outcome

    This outcome will be measured during the observational half-day, which should have a duration of approx. 4 hours.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Université de Sherbrooke

Other

Collaborators

  • Fondation Vitae

Registry information

Official study title

Acceptability of a Communication Tool Using Bedside Magnetized Posters, as Well as Barriers and Facilitators to Its Use.

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Aug 14, 2023
Registry last updated
Dec 5, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.