Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02666326

Accelerated Rule Out of Myocardial Infarction

Every year > 50.000 people in Denmark are hospitalized with a suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The majority has other explanations of their chest discomfort and most are discharged again without any initiation of treatment. Still, the suspicion dictates acute ambulance deployment, hospital admission to a highly specialized cardiac unit, cardiac surveillance and cardiac troponin blood sampling. The novel biomarker copeptin, a byproduct of vasopressin production, is released immediately from the pituitary gland as part of the hormonal response to AMI. Peak concentrations are reached within the first hour. Previous studies have suggested the combination of copeptin and cardiac troponin for fast and reliable rule out of AMI. However, the blood sampling should be performed as soon as possible after symptom onset, preferably already during the prehospital phase.

We aim, in an open randomized setting, to investigate the combined measurement of prehospital copeptin and in-hospital high sensitive cardiac Troponin T compared to the standard rule-out procedure of suspected myocardial infarction. We hypothesize that the combined measurement of prehospital copeptin and in-hospital high sensitive troponin T:

1. Reduces admission time by 1.5 hours in patients where AMI is ruled out 2. Reduces the time to disposition 3. Is non-inferior compared to the standard rule-out procedure in relation to major adverse cardiovascular events. 4. Is more cost efficient compared to standard diagnostic strategy

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Myocardial Infarction Acute Coronary Syndrome Cardiovascular Diseases Diabetes Insipidus Endocrine System Diseases Female Urogenital Diseases Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications Heart Diseases Infarction Ischemia Kidney Diseases Male Urogenital Diseases Myocardial Ischemia Necrosis Pathologic Processes Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Pituitary Diseases Urogenital Diseases Urologic Diseases Vascular Diseases

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Department of Cardiology, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Central Jutland, Denmark

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Patients with suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) constitute one of the largest patient groups in emergency medicine. The majority of these patients, however, have other causes than AMI, for their chest discomfort and many are discharged again without any initiation of treatment.(1) At present, cardiac troponin is gold standard in diagnosing AMI. Diagnostic levels of troponin are not reached until hours after onset of symptoms and serial sampling is recommended at intervals of 3-6 hours to confirm or rule-out AMI. The novel biomarker copeptin, a by-product of vasopressin production, is released immediately from the pituitary gland as part of the hormonal response to AMI. However, copeptin elevation, is not specific of AMI. Peak concentrations of copeptin are reached within the first hour and the values normalizes within 4-10 hours.(3) Previous studies have suggested the combination of copeptin and high-sensitive cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) for early and reliable rule-out of AMI.(2,3,6) These studies are based on copeptin measurement in blood sample acquired at hospital admission. However, because of the rapid release of copeptin, the blood sampling should be performed as early as possible after symptom onset, preferably already in the ambulance, whereas the analysis can be performed after arrival at the hospital because copeptin is stable. The PREHAB trial conducted in the Central Denmark Region, documented that prehospital blood sampling is performed 70 minutes earlier than first in-hospital sample.(5) Post-trial analysis of blood samples from the PREHAP trial has demonstrated the potential for early and safe rule-out of AMI using the combination of prehospital copeptin and in-hospital troponin analysis. AMI could potentially be safely, ruled out in approximately 40-50% of patients, in whom the AMI diagnosis eventually was dismissed.

During the last 7 years, studies have evaluated the effect and validity of prehospital blood sample analysis. This is now standard procedure in The Central Denmark Region, Denmark.(5) Currently, prehospital blood sampling is carried out in two major randomized studies, aiming at identifying patients with myocardial infarction and heart failure (NCT01638806 and NCT02050282).

Unfortunately, there is at present no point-of-care analysis equipment for copeptin available. Manufacturer of copeptin analysis equipment, Thermo Fischer, has informed that the development of point-care-care equipment is in process, but will not be available in near future. Therefore, we will perform in-hospital analysis of the prehospital blood samples.

Overall aim of this protocol is to demonstrate the combination of troponin T and copeptin as a safe and effective biomarker for rule-out of AMI. In a randomized setting, we will compare the combination of prehospital copeptin and in hospital hs-cTnT, to the standard diagnostic procedure in patients with suspected AMI, evaluating rule-out potential and potential for reduction of the length of stay at the hospital. The diagnostic effects of measuring copeptin/ hs-cTnT in prehospital vs in-hospital blood samples will be evaluated. Moreover an other diagnostic rule-out strategy, using hs-cTNT at admission and 1 hour after admission, will be evaluated in retrospective analysis of blood samples acquired from patients in the conventional diagnostics arm of the study.

Primary purposes of the AROMI trial:

  • To evaluate if early discharge, based in the combined biomarker analysis is associated to duration of hospital stay. Will be evaluated in interim analysis after rule out of AMI(discharged within 12 hours) in 900 patients (300 patients in each site)
  • To evaluate if early discharge, based in the combined biomarker analysis is associated to major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during index admission, after discharge, within 30, 90, and 365 days of randomization (separately or in combination). No interim evaluation of MACE.

Secondary purposes of the AROMI trial:

  • To evaluate if early discharge, based in the combined biomarker analysis is associated to time to decision of discharge or continued hospitalization. Will be evaluated in interim analysis after rule out of AMI(discharged within 12 hours) in 900 patients (300 patients in each site)
  • To evaluate if early discharge, based in the combined biomarker analysis is cost-effective regarding satisfaction and safety from a patients perspective.
  • To evaluate if early discharge, based in the combined biomarker analysis is cost-effective from a public perspective, regarding staff resources, costs of hospital stay, adherence to the labour market, and use of other healthcare services, Cost benefit analysis(CBA).
  • To evaluate if early discharge, based on the hs-cTnT analysis at arrival and 1 hour after arrival at hospital is associated to duration of hospital stay.
  • To evaluate if early discharge, based on the hs-cTnT analysis at arrival and 1 hour after arrival at hospital is associated to MACE(major adverse cardiac event) during index admission, after discharge, within 30, 90, and 365 days of randomization (separately or in combination).
  • To evaluate the diagnostic properties (including sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value) of the accelerated rule out algorithm using copeptin and high sensitivity troponin. Will be evaluated in interim analysis after rule out of AMI(discharged within 12 hours) in 900 patients (300 patients in each site). Will be evaluated in the total cohort (since both prehospital and inhospital copeptin and high sensitivity troponin is available in all patients) and randomization will not be revealed during this evaluation.
  • To evaluate the prognostic value of the accelerated rule out algorithm using copeptin and high sensitivity troponin. Will be evaluated in interim analysis after rule out of AMI(discharged within 12 hours) in 900 patients (300 patients in each site). Will be evaluated in the total cohort (since both prehospital and inhospital copeptin and high sensitivity troponin is available in all patients) and randomization will not be revealed during this evaluation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients which, after telemedical triage, are admitted to a cardiac department in suspicions of myocardial infarction
  • A peripheral venous catheter has been inserted prehospitally and blood has drawn from it, before flushing it.

Exclusion criteria

  • Age below 18 years
  • Patients in which an informed concent can not be obtained (psychiatric disease, dementia, under influence of drugs etc.),
  • Suspected STEMI and referral to Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), referral to a highly specialized cardiac department for another cardiac reason (e.g ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, 3° Atrio-ventricular block.)
  • Known central Diabetes insipidus
  • Other diagnosis as obvious reason for symptoms at time of admittance (e.g. a new diagnosis of supraventricular tachycardia, pulmonary embolism, aortic dissection) AND no suspicions of ACS

Treatment and study plan

Accelerated, combined biomarker rule-out strategy for MI

Procedure

Blood sample is acquired while the patient is in the ambulance. This is brought to hospital and handed over to the laboratory personnel for acute analysis for copeptin level. At arrival to hospital, a second blood sample is acquired and analyzed for high-sensitive cardiac troponin-T(hs-cTnT). Answers of these analyzes are in-hand with-in 60 minutes. If copeptin in the pre-hospital blood sample is <9,8 pmol/L (95% percentile) AND hs-cTnT in the in-hospital blood sample is <14ng/L (99% percentile), then myocardial infarction can be ruled out, and depending of clinical presentation, the patient can be discharged.

Primary outcomes

  1. Duration of hospital stay

    Time frame: Up to three months from randomization

    Time (hours and minutes) from admission to discharge from cardiac department. Reported by clinical personnel in registration form and supplemented by data from the national health registry. Will be evaluated in interim analysis after inclusion of 300 patients in each site.

  2. Combined MACE

    Time frame: Within time from randomization to 30 days after randomization

    Combined endpoint of major adverse cardiac events, consisting of: "All-cause mortality", "survived cardiac arrest", "Confirmed or Readmission with Acute Coronary Syndrome(ACS)", "Non-scheduled coronary intervention", and "Life-threatening arrhythmias" (see below for description) occuring within time from randomization to 30 days after randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to disposition

    Time frame: Within 24 h of randomization

    Time from admission to decision of early discharge or continued admission for further diagnostics or treatment. Will be evaluated in interim analysis after inclusion of 300 patients in each site.

  2. Combined MACE

    Time frame: Within index admission, within time from discharge to 30, 90, and 365 days after randomization, and within time from randomization to 90 and 365 days after randomization

    Combined endpoint of major adverse cardiac events, consisting of: "All-cause mortality", "survived cardiac arrest", "Readmission with Acute Coronary Syndrome(ACS)", "Non-scheduled coronary intervention", and "Life-threatening arrhythmias" (see below for description)

  3. All-cause mortality

    Time frame: Within index admission and within 30, 90 and 365 days of randomization

    All-cause mortality registered in the national health registry, occurring from time of admission to discharge, within 30, 90 or 365 days after randomization.

  4. Survived, cardiac arrest

    Time frame: Within index admission and within 30, 90 and 365 days of randomization

    Survived cardiac arrest is determined from registration of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in "Danish register of cardiac arrest" or in-hospital cardiac arrest in "Danarrest" or in the national health registry, occurring from time of admission to discharge, within 30, 90 or 365 days after randomization. The endpoint committee adjudicate survived cardiac arrest, blinded to the initial randomization.

  5. Confirmed diagnosis of ACS or readmission with ACS

    Time frame: Within index admission and within 30, 90 and 365 days of randomization

    The national health registry is used to determine whether the patient is confirmed of having or readmitted with acute coronary syndrome, from time of admission to discharge and within 30, 90 or 365 days after randomization. The endpoint committee adjudicate readmission with acute coronary syndrome, blinded to the initial randomization. The "2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation" and "Universal definition of Myocardial infarction" will be used to evaluate if the patient had: ACS, and subsequently classify it as a: a) Unstable angina pectoris(UAP), b) non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NONSTEMI), c) ST-Elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) d) Bundle branch block myocardial infarction (BBBMI)

  6. Non-scheduled coronary intervention

    Time frame: Within index admission and within 30, 90 and 365 days of randomization

    The national health registry is used to determine whether the patient has non-scheduled re-intervention performed (re-intervention not scheduled at index admission). Time from index admission to first re-intervention and type of re-intervention (PCI or CABG) is determined. The endpoint committee adjudicate re-interventions blinded to original treatment strategy

  7. Life-threatening arrhythmias

    Time frame: Within index admission and within 30, 90 and 365 days of randomization

    The national health registry is used to determine whether the patient is diagnosed or readmitted with a life-threatening arrhythmia, defined as ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation or third-degree(total) atrioventricular block within index admission and within 30, 90 or 365 days of randomization. The endpoint committee adjudicate readmission with life-threatening arrhythmia, blinded to the initial randomization.

Other outcomes

  1. Cost efficiency

    Time frame: Within index admission, and 1 year after randomization

    Costs and cost effectiveness will be evaluated and compared between the two diagnostic strategies.

  2. Risk factors and patient experiences

    Time frame: Within index admission, and 1 year after randomization

    The patients experience of being discharged earlier and risk factors for early readmission.

  3. Myocardial injury

    Time frame: Within index admission

    The laboratory registries is used to determine whether the patient has troponin elevation, from time of admission to discharge. The endpoint committee adjudicate myocardial injury, blinded to the initial randomization. "Universal definition of Myocardial infarction" will be used to evaluate the event.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Aarhus University Hospital Skejby

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Accelerated Rule-Out of Acute Myocardial Infarction, Using Copeptin and High Sensitive Troponin T - the AROMI Trial

Acronym: AROMI

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2020
First posted
Jan 28, 2016
Registry last updated
Apr 14, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.