Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05535946

ABTECT - Maintenance

This is a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of ABX464 50mg and 25mg administered once daily (QD) as maintenance therapy in subjects with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis who have inadequate response, no response, a loss of response, or an intolerance to either conventional therapies [corticosteroids, immunosuppressant (i.e. azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate)] and/or advanced therapies [biologics (TNF inhibitors, anti-integrins, anti-IL-23), and/or S1P receptor modulators, and/or JAK inhibitors].

This study is the maintenance phase of both previous induction studies ABX464-105 and ABX464-106.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Key information

Age range

16 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Instituto de Investigaciones Clinicas Quilmes, Quilmes, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Loading trial locations.

About this study

All eligible subjects who have completed either one of the induction studies above mentioned, will be given the opportunity to take part in the present ABX464-107 study which consists of 2 treatment phases.

This study consists of a 44-week maintenance treatment phase (Part 1 and Part 2), followed by a 4-year Long Term Extension (LTE) treatment phase and a 28-days follow-up period consisting in the End of Study (EOS) visit.

The maintenance phase is a 44-week double blind, placebo-controlled, phase. Subjects who are clinical responders after 8 weeks induction will be randomized to Part 1, and those who are non-clinical responders will be randomized to Part 2.

At the end of the 44-week maintenance phase, subjects will continue their allocated treatment until the maintenance phase is unblinded.

Once the study is unblinded, all subjects receiving obefazimod will continue their allocated treatment. Subjects receiving placebo will be allocated to obefazimod 25 mg or can terminate the study.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

in maintenance phase:

  • Subjects must have completed the induction treatment study (ABX464-105 or ABX464-106), and patients' clinical response status must be available.
  • Subjects with a valid endoscopy performed at the end of the induction study and results from central reader available at Day 1.
  • Subjects must understand, sign and date the written voluntary informed consent form at the visit prior to any protocol-specific procedures. For under-aged subjects, national requirements regarding consent should also be met.
  • Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) subjects and male subjects with WOCBP partner must agree to comply with contraception requirements as described in Section 4.4. (Contraception) of the protocol.
  • Subjects must be able and willing to comply with study visits and procedures as per protocol.
  • Subjects should be affiliated to a health insurance policy whenever required by a participating country or state

Inclusion criteria

in LTE phase:

  • Subject must have completed the maintenance phase
  • Investigator and subject must assess and agree that the subject has received, and will continue to receive benefit from being in the study

Exclusion criteria

in maintenance phase:

  • Subjects who permanently discontinued the study treatment during the induction study (either ABX464-105 or ABX464-106).
  • Subjects who have developed any major illness/condition (eg. primary sclerosis cholangitis, Crohn's disease, colectomy, diverting ileostomy, colon cancer or colonic adenomas [low or high grade dysplasia]).
  • Subjects with evidence of an unstable clinical condition (eg. toxic megacolon, fulminant colitis, bowel perforation, uncontrolled ischemic disease, congestive heart failure with NYHA class 3 or 4 symptoms) during the induction study that, in the investigator's judgment, will substantially increase the risk to the subject if he or she participates in the study.
  • Subjects who plan to participate in other investigational studies during the maintenance study.
  • Male or female planning a pregnancy, or pregnant female subjects
  • Introduction during induction study of prohibited medications, dosages, surgical or non-medicinal procedures indicated for UC (except antidiarrheals and motility agents for acute diarrhea).
  • Any changes in the laboratory values during the induction period that could jeopardize subject's safety in the opinion of the investigator. If any doubts, the investigator should contact the sponsor study medical monitor.
  • Subject who is planning to receive live vaccine during the study.
  • Subjects committed to an institution by virtue of an order issued either by the judicial or the administrative authorities.

Exclusion criteria

for LTE phase:

  • Subject continues to satisfy exclusion criteria listed above for the maintenance phase
  • Introduction during maintenance phase of prohibited medications, dosages, surgical or non-medicinal procedures indicated for UC (except antidiarrheals and motility agents for acute diarrhea).

Treatment and study plan

ABX464

Drug

Administered once daily, preferably in the morning, with food

Other names: Obefazimod

Placebo

Drug

Administered once daily, preferably in the morning, with food

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of subjects in clinical remission at Week 44

    Time frame: Week 44

    The Part 1 primary objective is to compare the efficacy of ABX464 versus placebo on the proportion of subjects in clinical remission [SFS = 0 or 1, RBS = 0 and endoscopy sub-score = 0 or 1] at Week 44.

  2. Number and percentage of all treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)

    Time frame: Week 44

    The Part 2 primary objective is safety

  3. Number and percentage of all serious adverse events (SAEs)

    Time frame: Week 44

    The Part 2 primary objective is safety

  4. Number and percentage of all causally related TEAEs/SAEs

    Time frame: Week 44

    The Part 2 primary objective is safety

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of subjects with endoscopic improvement at Week 44

    Time frame: Week 44

    To compare the efficacy of ABX464 versus placebo on endoscopic improvement (Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (MES) = 0 or 1) at Week 44

  2. Proportion of subjects with corticosteroid-free clinical remission

    Time frame: Week 44

    To compare the efficacy of ABX464 versus placebo on corticosteroid-free clinical remission (clinical remission at Week 44 and corticosteroid free for at least 12 weeks prior to Week 44 in the subpopulation with corticosteroids at maintenance study entry)

  3. Proportion of subjects with sustained clinical remission at Week 44

    Time frame: Week 44

    To compare the efficacy of ABX464 versus placebo to sustain clinical remission at Week 44

  4. Proportion of subjects with HEMI per Geboes scoring at Week 44

    Time frame: Week 44

    To evaluate the efficacy of ABX464 on histologic-endoscopic mucosal improvement (HEMI) versus placebo at Week 44

  5. Proportion of subjects with endoscopic remission at Week 44

    Time frame: Week 44

    To compare the efficacy of ABX464 versus placebo on endoscopic remission (MES = 0) at Week 44

  6. LTE Phase - Proportion of subjects in clinical remission at Year 1

    Time frame: LTE Year 1

    To evaluate the efficacy of obefazimod on clinical remission [SFS = 0 or 1, RBS = 0 and endoscopy sub-score = 0 or 1] at Year 1

  7. LTE Phase - Proportion of subjects in clinical remission at Year 4

    Time frame: LTE Year 4

    To evaluate the efficacy of obefazimod on clinical remission [SFS = 0 or 1, RBS = 0 and endoscopy sub-score = 0 or 1] at Year 4

  8. LTE Phase - Proportion of subjects with corticosteroid-free clinical remission in the subpopulation with corticosteroids at maintenance study entry

    Time frame: LTE Year 1

    To evaluate the efficacy of obefazimod on CS-free clinical remission (clinical remission at Year 1 and corticosteroid free for at least 12 weeks prior to Year 1 in the subpopulation with corticosteroids at maintenance study entry)

  9. LTE Phase - Proportion of subjects with corticosteroid-free clinical remission in the subpopulation with corticosteroids at maintenance study entry)

    Time frame: LTE Year 4

    To evaluate the efficacy of obefazimod on CS-free clinical remission (clinical remission at Year 4 and corticosteroid free for at least 12 weeks prior to Year 4 in the subpopulation with corticosteroids at maintenance study entry)

  10. LTE Phase - Proportion of subjects with endoscopic improvement at LTE Year 1

    Time frame: LTE Year 1

    To evaluate the efficacy of obefazimod on endoscopic improvement (Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (MES) = 0 or 1)

  11. LTE Phase - Proportion of subjects with endoscopic improvement at LTE Year 4

    Time frame: LTE Year 4

    To evaluate the efficacy of obefazimod on endoscopic improvement (Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (MES) = 0 or 1)

  12. LTE Phase - Proportion of subjects with endoscopic remission at LTE year 1

    Time frame: LTE year 1

    To evaluate the efficacy of obefazimod on endoscopic remission ((Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (MES) = 0)

  13. LTE Phase - Proportion of subjects with endoscopic remission at LTE year 4

    Time frame: LTE year 4

    To evaluate the efficacy of obefazimod on endoscopic remission (Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (MES) = 0)

  14. LTE Phase - Proportion of subjects with CS-free symptomatic remission by visit

    Time frame: 4 years

    To evaluate the efficacy of obefazimod on CS-free symptomatic remission (symptomatic remission (SFS = 0 or 1 and RBS = 0) and corticosteroid free for at least 12 weeks prior to Week 44 in the subpopulation with corticosteroids at maintenance study entry) by visit (every 3-month)

  15. LTE Phase - Proportion of subjects with HEMI per Geboes scoring at LTE Year 1

    Time frame: LTE Year 1

    To evaluate the efficacy of obefazimod on histologic endoscopic mucosal improvement (HEMI) per Geboes scoring

  16. LTE Phase - Proportion of subjects with HEMI per Geboes scoring at LTE Year 4

    Time frame: LTE Year 4

    To evaluate the efficacy of obefazimod on histologic endoscopic mucosal improvement (HEMI) per Geboes scoring

  17. LTE Phase - Proportion of subjects with HEMR per Geboes scoring at LTE Year 1

    Time frame: LTE Year 1

    To evaluate the efficacy of obefazimod on histologic endoscopic mucosal remission (HEMR) versus placebo

  18. LTE Phase - Proportion of subjects with HEMR per Geboes scoring at LTE Year 4

    Time frame: LTE Year 4

    To evaluate the efficacy of obefazimod on histologic endoscopic mucosal remission (HEMR) versus placebo

  19. LTE Phase - Proportion of subjects with sustained clinical remission at LTE Year 1, in the sub-population of subjects with clinical remission at Week 44

    Time frame: LTE Year 1

    To evaluate the efficacy of obefazimod on sustained clinical remission Sustained clinical remission for the LTE is defined as clinical remission assessed at an endoscopy visit during the LTE in the sub-population of subjects in clinical remission at Week 44.

  20. LTE Phase - Proportion of subjects with sustained clinical remission at LTE year 4, in the sub-population of subjects with clinical remission at Week 44

    Time frame: LTE year 4

    To evaluate the efficacy of obefazimod on sustained clinical remission Sustained clinical remission for the LTE is defined as clinical remission assessed at an endoscopy visit during the LTE in the sub-population of subjects in clinical remission at Week 44.

  21. LTE Phase - Proportion of subjects with sustained endoscopic improvement at LTE Year 1, in the sub-population of subjects with endoscopic improvement at Week 44

    Time frame: LTE Year 1

    To evaluate the efficacy of obefazimod on sustained endoscopic improvement

  22. LTE Phase - Proportion of subjects with sustained endoscopic improvement at LTE Year 4, in the sub-population of subjects with endoscopic improvement at Week 44

    Time frame: LTE year 4

    To evaluate the efficacy of obefazimod on sustained endoscopic improvement

  23. LTE Phase - Proportion of subjects with symptomatic remission by visit

    Time frame: 4 years

    To evaluate the efficacy of obefazimod on symptomatic remission (SFS = 0 or 1 and RBS = 0) by visit (every 3-month)

  24. LTE Phase - Proportion of subjects with sustained symptomatic remission by visit

    Time frame: 4 years

    To evaluate the efficacy of obefazimod on sustained symptomatic remission (SFS = 0 or 1 and RBS = 0) by visit (every 3-month), in the sub-population of subjects with symptomatic remission at Week 44

  25. LTE Phase - Proportion of subjects with CS-free clinical remission at LTE Year 1

    Time frame: LTE Year 1

    To evaluate the efficacy of obefazimod on CS-free clinical remission (clinical remission at Year 1 and CS-free for at least 12 weeks immediately prior to Year 1)

  26. LTE Phase - Proportion of subjects with CS-free clinical remission at LTE Year 4

    Time frame: LTE Year 4

    To evaluate the efficacy of obefazimod on CS-free clinical remission (clinical remission at Year 4 and CS-free for at least 12 weeks immediately prior to Year 4)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Abivax S.A.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Phase III Study to Evaluate the Long-term Efficacy and Safety of ABX464 25 mg or 50 mg Once Daily as a Maintenance Therapy in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2030
First posted
Sep 10, 2022
Registry last updated
Jul 7, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.