Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01655043

Absolute Quantification of Coronary Flow Reserve by Stress Perfusion MRI

Coronary artery disease (CAD, coronary heart disease) is the leading cause of death in the U.S., causing 1 in 5 deaths in 2005. The current method for diagnosing coronary artery disease that is considered most accurate is coronary angiography however it involves risk and radiation. Alternatively nuclear imaging test and MRI stress test only permits the semi qualitative analysis of the myocardial perfusion images.

In this proposal the investigators will develop a means to calculate Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR) using the MRI. the investigators approach has the potential to reduce mortality from myocardial infarction by effecting a change in the patient management paradigm. Absolute quantification of myocardial perfusion will detect coronary stenosis and CAD in patients with more accuracy than the semi-quantitative or qualitative analysis of perfusion images. Measurement of Coronary Flow Reserve is important for the following reasons: decrease of coronary flow reserve has been identified as a first effect of CAD; it provides an objective measure of treatment efficacy.

The purpose of this study is to compare images from nuclear stress test and/or coronary angiography with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) that will evaluate subjects with coronary artery disease calculating myocardial blood flow using a novel MRI technique combined to an extracellular Gadolinium-based contrast agent and stressor agent

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

19 year–89 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

About this study

The main hypothesis the investigators will test is that changes in myocardial blood volume, under physiologic stress, correlate with myocardial flow reserve as measured in low spatial resolution nuclear SPECT scans. Secondary hypothesis is that stress perfusion as quantified with bolus height corrected gadofosveset trisodium images, better correlate with SPECT perfusion than uncorrected, relative perfusion values.

The investigators propose implementing the scan protocol using a 1.5T or 3.0T MRI scanner. The investigators will scan a series of 20 patients recruited from the nuclear stress lab at Northwestern Memorial Hospital. These subjects will be approached and enrolled into a HIPPA Compliant, IRB approved research study to assess the effectiveness of myocardial perfusion and blood volume images to measure myocardial blood volume. Subjects will be scanned with a modified version of the clinical stress-perfusion protocol. Correlation analysis will be used to test the hypothesis that quantitative blood volume is an indicator of myocardial flow reserve.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Under an Institutional Committee on Human Research board approved protocol, 20 patients with a suspected myocardial ischemic disease with positive stress nuclear medicine test laboratory will be recruited in this prospective study. All subjects will be screened for GFR within 24 hours before the exam. All patients must have a GFR > 30 mL/min/1.73m2 to be included in the study.

All subjects will be selected following the Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF) guidelines. All dialysis patients or end-stage renal disease patients with a creatinine clearance of < 30mL/min will not be selected for the study to avoid NSF.

Exclusion criteria

  • Age 18 to 89 years;
  • Known contraindication to MR imaging (such as pacemaker placement, magnetic implants, etc);
  • Claustrophobia;
  • Inability to perform an adequate breath-hold for imaging,
  • Inability to provide informed consent;
  • all subjects will be will be screened for GFR within 24 hours before the exam and subjects presenting with GFR < 60 ml/min will be excluded;
  • Pregnant and lactating women;
  • Patients with hypersensitivity to gadolinium contrast agents, metoprolol, adenosine, or nitroglycerin;
  • Contra indication for Regadenoson
  • 2nd- or 3rd-degree AV block (except in patients with a functioning artificial pacemaker)
  • Sinus node disease (except in patients with a functioning artificial pacemaker)
  • Unstable angina
  • Acute myocardial infarction
  • Known or suspected bronchoconstrictive or bronchospastic lung disease (e.g., asthma)
  • Hypersensitivity to adenosine
  • Caffeine within 12-24 hours
  • Theophylline and Dipyridamole products within 24 hours

Treatment and study plan

Regadenoson

Drug

Regadenoson will be infused intravenously 0.4 mg/5 mL (0.08 mg/mL) as a single bolus.

Other names: Lexiscan

gadofoveset trisodium

Drug

All subjects to receive 5 ml IV gadofoveset trisodium contrast (Ablavar) at both stress and rest.

Other names: Ablavar

Primary outcomes

  1. Quantification of Myocardial Blood Volume

    Time frame: outcome measured following single MRI scan

    The investigators anticipated that a novel MRI imaging protocol using a high relaxivity blood-pool contrast agent (gadofosveset trisodium) would be capable of quantifying coronary flow reserve based on quantification of myocardial blood volume and would be correlated with myocardial flow reserve as measured in low spatial resolution nuclear SPECT scans. Pre- and post- gadofosveset trisodium images were to be used to calculate the myocardial blood volume. Myocardial blood volume is derived from an equation of the relaxation times of hydrogen atoms in the blood and myocardium. If the agent administered did not behave as a true intravascular agent in the myocardium, quantification of myocardial intravascular blood volume (and hence a calculated coronary flow reserve) could not be calculated using the specified approach. In this case, relaxation times would be reported. Relaxation (R) times are measured in inverse seconds.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Northwestern University

Other

Collaborators

  • Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Aug 1, 2012
Registry last updated
Aug 28, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.