Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01694485

Abrilumab (AMG 181) in Adults With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of abrilumab on induction of remission in adults with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis after 8 weeks of treatment as assessed by a total Mayo Score ≤ 2 points, with no individual subscore > 1 point.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Research Site, Bankstown, New South Wales, Australia

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The study consisted of a 24-week double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment period followed by an open-label period of approximately 108 weeks. Participants were eligible to enter the open-label period of the study early if they did not achieve a response at week 8 and had an inadequate response at week 12 or later or if they experienced disease worsening after achieving response and/or remission at week 8. Failure to achieve response at week 8 was defined as failure to achieve a decrease from baseline in total Mayo Score ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30% decrease from baseline. Inadequate response at week 12 or later was defined as failure to achieve a 2-point decrease and 25% improvement in partial Mayo Score compared with screening and minimum partial Mayo Score ≥ 5 points. Disease worsening was defined as an increase in partial Mayo Score ≥ 3 points from the week 8 value and minimum partial Mayo Score ≥ 5 points with recto-sigmoidoscopy sub-score ≥ 2.

Participants were planned to be randomized in a 2:1:2:2:2 ratio to placebo or abrilumab at 7 mg, 21 mg, 70 mg (on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24), or 210 mg (on day 1 followed by placebo in weeks 2 and 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24), respectively. Due to a consistent discrepancy between the investigational product (IP) instruction manual (IPIM) description of vial positions and the actual vial positions in the IP package participants were initially randomized to 3 arms (placebo, 70 mg, and 210 mg) with a randomization ratio of 4:3:2. The study was temporarily paused while this issue was investigated. Once the discrepancy was corrected, Protocol Amendment 3 implemented, and affected participants completed their double-blind treatment period, the study resumed enrollment and randomization per protocol. Neither the randomization nor study blind was compromised and therefore the intent-to-treat principle was maintained.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (UC) established ≥ 3 months before baseline by clinical and endoscopic evidence and corroborated by a histopathology report.
  • Moderate to severe active UC as defined by a total Mayo score of 6 to 12 with a centrally read rectosigmoidoscopy score ≥2 prior to baseline
  • Inadequate response to, loss of response to, or intolerance to at least one of the following treatments:
  • Immunomodulators
  • Anti-TNF agents
  • Corticosteroids (non-US sites only).
  • Neurological exam free of clinically significant, unexplained signs or symptoms during screening and no clinically significant change prior to randomization

Exclusion criteria

  • Disease limited to the rectum (ie, within 10 cm of the anal verge)
  • Toxic megacolon
  • Crohn's Disease
  • History of subtotal colectomy with ileorectostomy or colectomy with ileoanal pouch, Koch pouch, or ileostomy for UC
  • Planned bowel surgery within 24 weeks from baseline
  • Stool positive for C. Difficile toxin at screening
  • History of gastrointestinal surgery within 8 weeks of baseline
  • Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
  • Any uncontrolled or clinically significant systemic disease
  • Condition or disease that, in the opinion of the investigator would pose a risk to subject safety or interfere with study evaluation, procedures or completion.
  • Known to have tested positive for hepatitis B virus surface antigen, hepatitis C virus antibody or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
  • Underlying condition that predisposes subject to infections (eg, uncontrolled diabetes; history of splenectomy)
  • Known history of drug or alcohol abuse within 1 year of screening
  • Malignancy (other than resected cutaneous basal or cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, or treated in situ cervical cancer considered cured) within 5 years of screening visit (if a malignancy occurred > 5 years ago, subject is eligible with documentation of disease free state since treatment)
  • Immunosuppressive therapy with either cyclosporine A, tacrolimus, or mycophenolate mofetil, within 1 month prior to baseline
  • Prior exposure to anti tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents, within 2 months, or 5 times the respective elimination half life (whichever is longer) prior to baseline
  • Any prior exposure to vedolizumab, rituximab, efalizumab, natalizumab
  • Use of topical (rectal) aminosalicylic acid (eg, mesalamine) or topical (rectal) steroids within 2 weeks prior to baseline
  • Use of intravenous or intramuscular corticosteroids within 2 weeks prior to screening and during screening
  • Previously treated with AMG 181
  • Received any type of live attenuated vaccine < 1 month prior to baseline or is planning to receive any such live attenuated vaccine over the course of the study
  • Treatment of infection with intravenous (within 30 days of baseline) or oral (within 14 days prior to baseline) antibiotics, antivirals, or antifungals
  • Abnormal laboratory results at screening
  • Any other laboratory abnormality, which, in the opinion of the investigator, will prevent the subject from completing the study or will interfere with the interpretation of the study results
  • Currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug study, or less than 30 days since ending another investigational device or drug study(s), or receiving other investigational agent(s)

Treatment and study plan

Abrilumab

Biological

Administered by subcutaneous injection.

Other names: AMG 181

Placebo

Drug

Placebo matching to abrilumab administered by subcutaneous injection

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Remission at Week 8

    Time frame: Week 8

    Remission was defined as a total Mayo Score ≤ 2 points, with no individual subscore > 1 point.

    The Mayo Score is a composite index of four items (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, rectosigmoidoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment) with each item graded semi-quantitatively on a score of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher score represents more severe disease status. The total Mayo Score is the sum of the four item scores, with a result ranging from 0 to 12 points. Higher scores represent more severe disease.

    The remission rate (percentage of participants with remission) was calculated based on observed data (unadjusted remission rate) and also after applying a logistic regression model including the factors of treatment group, stratification factors (prior anti-TNF use and pre- versus post-Protocol Amendment 3) and baseline total Mayo Score (adjusted remission rate).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Response at Week 8

    Time frame: Baseline and week 8

    Response was defined by a decrease from baseline in the total Mayo Score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore ≥ 1 point or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore = 0 or 1.

    The Mayo Score is a composite index of four items (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, rectosigmoidoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment), each graded semi-quantitatively on a scale of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher score represents more severe disease status. The total Mayo Score is the sum of the four item scores, ranging from 0 to 12 points. Higher scores represent more severe disease.

    The response rate (percentage of participants with response) was calculated based on observed data (unadjusted response rate) and also after applying a logistic regression model including the factors of treatment group, stratification factors (prior anti-TNF use and pre- versus post-Protocol Amendment 3) and baseline total Mayo Score (adjusted response rate).

  2. Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 8

    Time frame: Week 8

    Mucosal healing was defined using the rectosigmoidoscopy subscore of Mayo assessment as absolute subscore for rectosigmoidoscopy of 0 or 1.

    Flexible rectosigmoidoscopy was performed as part of the Mayo assessment, graded semi-quantitatively on a scale of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher score represents more severe disease status.

    The healing rate (percentage of participants with mucosal healing) was calculated based on observed data (unadjusted healing rate) and also after applying a logistic regression model including the factors of treatment group, stratification factors (prior anti-TNF use and pre- versus post-Protocol Amendment 3) and baseline rectosigmoidoscopy score (adjusted healing rate).

  3. Percentage of Participants With Sustained Remission at Week 8 and Week 24

    Time frame: Week 8 and week 24

    Remission was defined as a total Mayo Score ≤ 2 points, with no individual subscore > 1 point. Sustained remission was defined as achieving the criteria for remission at both week 8 and week 24.

    The Mayo Score is a composite index of four items (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, rectosigmoidoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment), each graded semi-quantitatively on a scale of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher scores represent more severe disease status. The total Mayo Score is the sum of the four item scores, with a and ranges from 0 to 12 points. Higher scores represent more severe disease.

    The remission rate (percentage of participants with sustained remission) was calculated based on observed data (unadjusted remission rate) and also after applying a logistic regression model including the factors of treatment group, stratification factors (prior anti-TNF use and pre- versus post-Protocol Amendment 3) and baseline total Mayo Score (adjusted remission rate).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Amgen

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized, Double Blind, Multiple Dose Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of AMG 181 in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2018
First posted
Sep 27, 2012
Registry last updated
Jun 27, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.