Catheter ablation
ProcedureRF ablation with complete circumferential ablation around the right and PVs, optional additional lines between the lower and upper PVs, and towards the mitral valve ring.
NCT Number: NCT00662701
The purpose of this study is to compare 2 invasive strategies for Atrial Fibrillation treatment, Endocardial catheter ablation isolation of the Pulmonary veins versus minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgical epicardial isolation. Both strategies are in use for several years now, and have been reported as a successful strategy with success rates of 60-90%. However, it is not known which technique is preferable in a given patient population in terms of efficacy to cure AF, safety, or patient discomfort. Therefore, in the present trial a randomized study is proposed to provide more insight into the relative merits of both techniques
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me30 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
Atrial Fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, affecting millions of people around the world. It is a large burden on health care resources and may even lead to a shorter life expectancy. Drug treatment has been found insufficient and sometimes even hazardous to the pt. Traditionally, there was only one invasive approach available, being MAZE 3 procedure by means of full open chest cardiac surgery. This was a very invasive approach, limited to only a few skilled surgeons, with insufficient options to treat large pt volume.
With the discovery that AF often is initiated and maintained by electrical instability inside and around the Pulmonary Veins, catheter ablation is now a widely accepted early invasive strategy to cure AF. Success rates of 60% to 90% have been reported, depending on technique employed and the type of AF (Resp, chronic versus paroxysmal)
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
RF ablation with complete circumferential ablation around the right and PVs, optional additional lines between the lower and upper PVs, and towards the mitral valve ring.
Minimal invasive thoracoscopic surgery including isolation of the PVs by AtriCure and removal of the LAA.
Time frame: 6 months
Time frame: 6 months
Time frame: 6 and 12 Months
Time frame: 12 Months
St. Antonius Hospital
Other
Atrial Fibrillation: Ablation or Surgical Treatment; A Randomized Study Comparing Non-pharmacologic Therapy in Patients With Drug-refractory Atrial Fibrillation
Acronym: FAST
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05820295
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05993897
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Aswān, Aswan Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05357690
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05164718
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Drammen, Norway
View Trial Details