Karolinska University Hospital
Stockholm, Stockholm County, SE-14186, Sweden
NCT Number: NCT04377594
Brief summary: The objective of this study is to compare two different ablation strategies in participants with persistent atrial fibrillation and fibrotic areas in the left atrium. The participant will be randomized to pulmonary vein isolation or pulmonary vein isolation plus ablation of fibrotic areas.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Stockholm, Stockholm County, SE-14186, Sweden
Background:
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice with a prevalence of 2-3 percent in the population. Catheter ablation performing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an established treatment, which aim to eliminate triggers from the pulmonary veins. This treatment is successful in most patients with paroxysmal AF. In many patients, especially the patients with persistent AF, this treatment is not sufficiently to achieve freedom from arrhythmia and symptoms.
There are several studies showing that fibrosis in the left atrium (LA) is an independent factor to relapse in AF after PVI. The fibrotic areas can be detected by measuring the voltage in the left atrium and creating a voltage map. There are non-randomized studies that suggest better results regarding reduction of arrhythmia burden after ablating the low voltage areas (LVAs). This ablation strategy is commonly used in clinical praxis although there are no randomized studies in this field.
Aim:
The objective of this study is to compare two different ablation strategies in participants with persistent atrial fibrillation and fibrotic areas in the left atrium. The participant will be randomized to PVI versus PVI plus ablation of LVAs.
The primary endpoint is freedom of atrial arrhythmias after 1 to 2 ablation procedures within 6 months measured at 12 months after the first ablation procedure without antiarrhythmic drugs. Secondary endpoints will be atrial arrhythmia burden, health related quality of life measured by AFEQT score, and RAND 36 and periprocedural complications; death, stroke/ TIA, tamponade, atrio-esophageal fistula, and atrioventricular block.
Study design:
Randomized controlled multicenter trial. The study will be single blinded. All the participants will undergo PVI and the substrate map will be collected during atrial pacing. The patients with LVA will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to; PVI plus ablation of LVA or PVI alone. Follow up visits will be at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Before ablation and at every follow up visit the participants will fill in arrhythmia symptom specific questionnaires (AFEQT and ASTA) and questionnaire about quality of life (RAND 36). The participants will register arrhythmia with a heart monitoring system if symptoms of arrhythmia and two times daily during two weeks before every follow up visit.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Two different radio frequency ablation procedures
Time frame: From 3 months (blanking period) to 12 months after the first ablation procedure
Freedom from documented atrial arrhythmias >30 seconds at 12 months after 1 or 2 ablation procedures within 6 months without antiarrhythmic drugs
Time frame: From 3 months (blanking period) to 12 months after the first ablation procedure
Freedom from documented atrial arrhythmias >30 seconds at 12 months after 1 ablation procedure without antiarrhythmic drugs
Time frame: From 3 months (blanking period) to 12 months after the first ablation procedure
Freedom from documented atrial arrhythmias >30 seconds at 12 months after 1 ablation procedure with or without antiarrhythmic drugs
Time frame: From 3 months (blanking period) to 12 months after the first ablation procedure
Freedom from documented atrial arrhythmias >30 seconds at 12 months after 1 or 2 ablation procedures with or without antiarrhythmic drugs
Time frame: From 3 months (blanking period) to 12 months after the first ablation procedure
Freedom from documented atrial fibrillation >30 seconds at 12 months after 1 or 2 ablation procedures without antiarrhythmic drugs
Time frame: From 3 months (blanking period) to 12 months after the first ablation procedure
Freedom from documented symptomatic atrial arrhythmias >30 seconds at 12 months after 1 or 2 ablation procedures with or without antiarrhythmic drugs
Time frame: From 3 months (blanking period) to 24 months after the first ablation procedure
Freedom from documented atrial arrhythmias >30 seconds at 24 months after 1 or several ablation procedures without antiarrhythmic drugs
Time frame: From 3 months (blanking period) to 24 months after the first ablation procedure
Freedom from documented symptomatic atrial arrhythmias >30 seconds at 24 months after 1 or several ablation procedures with or without antiarrhythmic drugs
Time frame: From 3 months (blanking period) to 12 months and 24 months after the first ablation procedure
Number of Registrations with Remote Heart Monitor / Number of Registrations with Atrial Arrhythmia with Remote Heart Monitor
Time frame: From first ablation procedure to 24 months
Time from first ablation procedure to first documented recurrens of atrial arrhythmias
Time frame: 12 and 24 months after the first ablation procedure
Number of repeat procedures
Time frame: Baseline, 12 and 24 months after the first ablation procedure
AFEQT is a 21 questions atrial fibrillation specific health related quality of life questionnaire. Overall Score (calculated from 18 of the questions) and subscale scores in three domains: symptoms, daily activities, and treatment concern. Score ranges from 0 to 100 points. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline,12 and 24 months after the first ablation procedure
RAND 36 (developed by RAND corporation) is a 36 questions health related quality of life questionnaire. The RAND 36 is divided into 8 domains: Physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, bodily pain, vitality, general health, social functioning and mental health. Score range from 0 to 100 points. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: 12 and 24 months after the first ablation procedure
Complications related to the ablation procedure: Cardiac perforation, stroke, transitory ischemic attack (TIA), systemic embolic events, atrio-esophageal fistula, major bleeding, atrioventricular block, groin hematoma requiring vascular surgery or extended hospitalization.
Time frame: 12 and 24 months after the first ablation procedure
Number of Participants With All-cause Mortality
Time frame: Immediately after the procedure
Time from start of groin punction to withdrawal of the catheters
Time frame: Immediately after the procedure
Total fluoroscopy time during the procedure
Karolinska University Hospital
Other
Individually DEsigned Ablation of Low Voltage Areas in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, a Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial
Acronym: IDEAL-AF
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06808217
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Vienna, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT05501873
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Brisbane, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT06748157
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06521463
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details