Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07626931

Abdominal Stimulation to Improve Cough After Spinal Cord Injury

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if abdominal functional electrical stimulation (FES) using the VentFree Respiratory Muscle Stimulator improves cough strength in adults with a new spinal cord injury (SCI). It will also learn about the safety of abdominal FES in this population. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does abdominal FES improve cough peak flow (a measure of cough strength) compared to cough training alone? Does abdominal FES reduce the number of respiratory complications (such as pneumonia or atelectasis)? What medical problems do participants have when receiving abdominal FES?

Researchers will compare abdominal FES (active treatment) to supervised cough training without stimulation (control) to see if abdominal FES improves cough function after spinal cord injury.

Participants will:

Receive abdominal FES or perform supervised cough training 5 days per week for up to 6 weeks during inpatient rehabilitation Have cough strength and breathing function measured at the start of the study and every week during treatment Complete quality of life and bowel function questionnaires at multiple time points Have a follow-up visit or phone call 4 weeks after completing treatment

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

About this study

Spinal cord injury (SCI) at the cervical or high thoracic level impairs the abdominal and intercostal muscles, reducing expiratory muscle strength and cough effectiveness. An impaired cough leads to secretion retention and respiratory complications, which are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the first year following SCI. Current standard-of-care techniques such as manually assisted coughing and mechanical insufflation-exsufflation can augment assisted cough but do not directly improve a patient's voluntary, unassisted cough function.

Abdominal functional electrical stimulation (FES) uses transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) applied to the abdominal wall muscles in synchrony with the expiratory phase of breathing. This approach can recruit the abdominal muscles in the absence of voluntary or automatic muscle activation, making it particularly suited for use after SCI. Prior investigator-initiated studies and pilot randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that abdominal FES is safe and feasible in this population, and that repeated training with abdominal FES can produce longitudinal improvements in respiratory function including cough peak flow (CPF), forced vital capacity (FVC), and peak expiratory flow (PEF).

This is a prospective, randomized, single-blind (observer-blinded), multicenter superiority trial enrolling adults with a new non-progressive SCI at neurological levels C1-T5 (AIS A-C) who are in the inpatient rehabilitation phase of care and have a CPF below 160 L/min. Approximately 150 participants will be enrolled at up to 20 sites in North America and randomized 1:1 to active treatment or control. Randomization is stratified by site and injury level.

Participants in the active group receive abdominal FES during 3 sets of 10 coughs followed by 30 minutes of quiet breathing, 5 days per week, for up to 6 weeks or until hospital discharge. Stimulation is delivered at 30 Hz / 350 µs during quiet breathing and 50 Hz / 400 µs during coughing, with amplitude titrated to achieve a strong visible abdominal wall contraction. Participants in the control group perform 3 sets of 10 supervised volitional coughs per day, 5 days per week, for the same duration, with no active stimulation.

The primary endpoint is CPF measured 4 weeks post-randomization. Secondary endpoints include additional respiratory function measures (FVC, FEV1, PEF, MIP, MEP), effectiveness of cough (proportion achieving CPF >160 L/min), respiratory complications, bowel function (Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Score), quality of life (SF-36ww), global impression of benefit, and mortality. All respiratory function measurements follow ATS/ERS guidelines. Outcome assessors and radiographers are blinded to treatment allocation.

The sample size of 150 participants (75 per group) provides 90% power to detect a 42 L/min between-group difference in CPF improvement from baseline, assuming a standard deviation of 72 L/min and a one-sided significance level of 0.025, with 15% attrition allowance.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults (≥ 22 years of age) admitted to rehabilitation with a new SCI.
  • New non-progressive SCI occurring in the past 3 to 8 weeks.
  • Neurological level of injury of C1-T5.
  • American Spinal Injuries Association Impairment Scale A to C.
  • CPF of <160 L/min (Note: A CPF of <270 L/min has been shown to be associated with decreased secretion clearance and increased respiratory complications, while a CPF of <160 L/min has been shown to lead to an ineffective cough).
  • Not dependent on mechanical ventilation (people dependent on mechanical ventilation are at greatly increased risk of respiratory complications and are excluded due to this heterogeneity).
  • Able to sit upright.
  • Expected to remain in rehabilitation for at least another 3 weeks.

Exclusion criteria

  • Respiratory complications in previous 24 hours (screening out iatrogenic complications).
  • Chronic respiratory disease.
  • No contraction of the abdominal wall muscles in response to abdominal NMES.
  • Open abdominal surgery ≤ 4 weeks prior to enrollment.
  • Have yet to undergo spinal surgery to stabilize injury, where required.
  • Body mass index >40 kg/m2.
  • Pacemaker (external or internal) or implanted electronic device (e.g., a defibrillator).
  • Known or expected to be pregnant.
  • Placed on a palliative/supportive care only pathway.
  • Receiving any of the following as standard of care:
  • Abdominal FES
  • Inspiratory or Expiratory muscle training
  • Transcutaneous or implanted thoracolumbar spinal stimulation
  • Participating in any of the following:
  • A study with the same or similar primary endpoint
  • A study investigating electrical stimulation or respiratory muscle therapy
  • Any study in which the investigator determines may interfere with the results of this study
  • Unable or unwilling to comply with protocol requirements, including assessments, tests, and follow-up visits including facial or dental trauma.
  • Any other medical condition which in the opinion of the Investigator will make participation medically unsafe or interfere with the study results.
  • Unable to provide informed consent.
  • Unwilling to provide informed consent.

Treatment and study plan

Respiratory Muscle Stimulator

Device

Transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) device that applies abdominal functional electrical stimulation (FES) to the abdominal wall muscles in synchrony with the expiratory phase of breathing. The device consists of a control unit, nasal-oral cannula (used to detect breathing phase), disposable transcutaneous stimulation electrodes, and power supply. Electrodes are placed posterolaterally to activate the transversus abdominis and internal and external oblique muscles. Stimulation parameters are 30 Hz / 350 µs during quiet breathing and 50 Hz / 400 µs during coughing. Stimulation amplitude is titrated per session to achieve a strong visible abdominal wall contraction without discomfort, expected to be between 50 mA and 100 mA. Stimulation electrodes and nasal-oral cannula are replaced every five days of treatment.

Supervised Cough Training

Behavioral

Supervised volitional cough training performed without any active stimulation or device assistance. Participants perform 3 sets of 10 coughs per day with approximately 7 seconds between each cough and 3 to 5 minutes between sets, delivered by a trained research team member at the participant's bedside with the participant sitting upright.

Primary outcomes

  1. Cough Peak Flow (CPF)

    Time frame: baseline and weekly post randomization for 6 weeks or until hospital discharge, whatever comes first.

    Cough peak flow measured in liters per minute (L/min) using the PneumotracTM (Vitalograph; Lenexa, KS) bedside respiratory muscle strength system, following European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines. Measurements are recorded with the participant seated upright in a chair/wheelchair or at 90 degrees in bed, breathing through a mouthpiece or tracheostomy valve piece with a nose clip in place. The participant is instructed to breathe in deeply to total lung capacity then cough as hard as possible. The test is performed 3 times and the greatest value is used for analysis. A CPF of less than 160 L/min indicates an ineffective cough, and a CPF of less than 270 L/min has been shown to be associated with decreased secretion clearance and increased respiratory complications in spinal cord injury.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effectiveness of Cough

    Time frame: At 6 weeks or hospital discharge, whatever comes first

    Proportion of participants achieving a cough peak flow greater than 160 L/min, measured using the PneumotracTM (Vitalograph; Lenexa, KS), indicating attainment of an effective cough threshold.

  2. Number of Participants with Respiratory Complications

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the 4 week follow-up visit

    roportion of participants sustaining a respiratory complication, defined as meeting 2 out of 3 of the following criteria: symptoms and signs suggestive of infection; respiratory symptoms or signs consistent with acute respiratory infection; chest X-ray infiltrates if available; AND receiving therapy for respiratory infection. Includes atelectasis, pneumonia, pleural effusion, and respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation. Extracted from medical records during treatment and through participant self-reporting at follow-up.

  3. Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)

    Time frame: At 6 weeks or hospital discharge, whatever comes first

    Forced vital capacity measured in liters using the PneumotracTM (Vitalograph; Lenexa, KS) with the participant seated upright, following ATS/ERS guidelines. Three reproducible maneuvers within 10% of each other are required and the greatest value is used for analysis.

  4. Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)

    Time frame: At 6 weeks or hospital discharge, whatever comes first

    Forced expiratory volume in one second measured in liters using the PneumotracTM (Vitalograph; Lenexa, KS) with the participant seated upright, following ATS/ERS guidelines. Three reproducible maneuvers within 10% of each other are required and the greatest value is used for analysis.

  5. Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)

    Time frame: At 6 weeks or hospital discharge, whatever comes first

    Peak expiratory flow measured in liters per minute using the PneumotracTM (Vitalograph; Lenexa, KS) with the participant seated upright, following ATS/ERS guidelines. Three reproducible maneuvers within 10% of each other are required and the greatest value is used for analysis.

  6. Maximum Expiratory Pressure (MEP)

    Time frame: At 6 weeks or hospital discharge, whatever comes first

    Maximum expiratory pressure measured in cmH2O using the PneumotracTM (Vitalograph; Lenexa, KS) with the participant seated upright. The participant breathes in to total lung capacity then performs a maximum forceful expiration, maintained for at least 1.5 seconds. Three reproducible maneuvers within 10% of each other are required and the greatest value is used for analysis.

  7. Maximum Inspiratory Pressure (MIP)

    Time frame: At 6 weeks or hospital discharge, whatever comes first

    Maximum inspiratory pressure measured in cmH2O using the PneumotracTM (Vitalograph; Lenexa, KS) with the participant seated upright. The participant performs a maximum forceful inspiration after an expiration to residual volume, maintained for at least 1.5 seconds. Three reproducible maneuvers within 10% of each other are required and the greatest value is used for analysis.

  8. Quality of Life as Assessed by the SF-36

    Time frame: At 6 weeks or hospital discharge, whatever comes first, and 4 week follow-up visit

    Health-related quality of life measured using the Short Form Health Survey modified and validated for wheelchair users (SF-36ww). The SF-36ww assesses eight health domains and produces physical and mental component summary scores. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.

  9. Bowel Function as Assessed by the Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Score

    Time frame: At baseline and weekly post randomization for 6 weeks or until hospital discharge, whatever comes first, and at 4-week follow-up

    Bowel function measured using the Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Score, a validated 10-item self-report questionnaire evaluating severity of bowel dysfunction in spinal cord injury patients. Scores range from 0 to 47, with higher scores indicating more severe bowel dysfunction.

  10. Global Impression of Benefit from Intervention

    Time frame: At the end of 6 weeks of treatment or hospital discharge, whatever comes first

    Participant-reported global impression of change assessed using an 8-point scale, with 0 representing no change and 7 representing a very much improved cough, to evaluate the perceived benefit of the intervention.

  11. Mortality

    Time frame: At 6 weeks or hospital discharge, whatever comes first, and 4 week follow-up visit

    All-cause mortality. For any participant who dies before the 4-week post-intervention follow-up, time post injury and cause of death will be obtained from the participant's clinician.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Director of Clinical Operations

CONTACT

[email protected]

833-203-4663

Head of Clinical Affairs

CONTACT

[email protected]

833-203-4663

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Liberate Medical

Industry

Collaborators

  • United States Department of Defense

Registry information

Official study title

Abdominal Function Electrical Stimulation to Improve Cough Peak Flow After Spinal Cord Injury: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Acronym: COUFES

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Jun 4, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 4, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.