University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908, United States
NCT Number: NCT02159625
Hemodialysis (HD) patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) experience higher rates of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality than do the general population and many populations with other chronic diseases. This exceptional risk is explained in part by known risk factors, such as diabetes, hypertension, and other uremia-related factors, including vascular calcification and stiffness, autonomic dysfunction, and a high burden of circulating inflammatory mediators. Recent studies suggest that blood pressure variability, especially intra-dialytic hypotension (IDH) is the most significant risk factor for these CV events. Studies have also shown that the use of IAB is capable of improving cardiovascular function for avoiding or minimizing the development of an orthostatic hypotensive episode (OHE) in patients with autonomic dysfunction, orthostatic hypotension (OH) in diabetes patients and children with orthostatic intolerance, and post-dialytic orthostatic hypotension (PDOH).
The investigators propose a study to examine the use of an abdominal compression elastic support (ACES) to prevent the development of IDH in patients who are known to be prone to these episodes. The ultimate goal is to facilitate more effective and safer dialysis therapy. The ACES has a configuration that is similar to a back-support work belt or an inflatable abdominal band (IAB). All of these devices are wrapped around to compress the abdomen at the waist.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908, United States
I. Study Design: Biomedical
II. Human Participants Ages: 18 or older Sex: Male and Female Race: All
Subjects or Patients:
<!-- -->
In our study design, the countermeasure implemented in each "control" session may be different. Our study can lead to an answer on whether the use of ACES is more effective in alleviating IDH than the "control" countermeasure.
The researchers will only handle the quantitative data and the analysis of enumeration and quantitative data. To assure integrity in and correctness of data analysis, all data will be forwarded to a statistician who is not physically involved with the study for an independent evaluation.
A. On the safety issue: Due to the low compression pressure and no adverse effects seen in the use of IAB, we expect that the investigators should not see the development of any adverse effect in the current clinical trial. When the investigators carry out 40 ACES session in Phase II and show no adverse effect, then the likely hood for an adverse effect to develop will be at most 2.5%. Even if the occurrence frequency were at 25%, a sample size of 16 sessions will be more than adequate to demonstrate the safety hypothesis with a confidence better than 99% (i.e. P<0.01).
B. On the reduction in occurrence frequency. The patients participated in the study will have at least 2 episodes in a month. It can add up to an occurrence frequency of 25%. This is to say that 20 out of the 80 control sessions will have IDH developed. If the occurrence frequency is reduced to 12.5% (i.e. 12 sessions with IDH out of the 80 ACES sessions), the data of 80 ACES session will be adequate to show a confidence level of 99% by the chi square test (P<0.01) that the use of ACES is effective in reducing the occurrence frequency. On the other hand, if the frequency estimated from the data of Phase II is reduced to 18% (instead of 12.5%), then the data of 80 ACES sessions in Phase II will yield a χ2 of about 2.0. With data of 80 more ACES sessions in Phase II, the value of χ2 for the same decrease in occurrence frequency may increase to 4 to indicate that the reduction in occurrence frequency has a confidence level of 95% (P<0.05).
The above computation analysis has been expanded to examine how test size and the values of occurrence rate affect the value of χ2 and subsequently whether the occurrence rate is significantly reduced with the use of ACES. The investigators find that the three test sizes (80 tests mentioned here, 160 tests and 480 periods mentioned later) set for use in the protocol are adequate to carry out the statistical determination.
Currently the investigators do not have a certain way to predict when IDH will develop. Thus, the investigators consider each HD session done on the same patient as independent.
IV. Biomedical Research
In order to fulfill the study statistical requirements, up to five (5) healthy subjects will be tested for safety and tolerability of wearing ACES for 3 hours. Each healthy individual will then wear the ACES for three consecutive hours in a supine or seated position, except for use of the restroom if needed, and assess the measured parameters.
If no major concerns are identified with this healthy population the use of ACES device will be offered for use in dialysis patients who have three or more episodes of IDH in the 4 weeks leading up to recruitment.
Hemodialysis patients at the University of Virginia Kidney Center have their hemodialysis done in a seated position (30° to 90°). The investigators will be using the ACES device on these patients in a seated position.
In order to fulfill the study statistical requirements, up to ten (10) ESRD patients on HD will be tested for safety and tolerability of wearing ACES during their dialysis sessions.
Screening trial session for Dialysis Patients After the patient reads and signs the consent form and passes the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the investigators will have him or her to undergo a trial session of ACES. This trial session can be done on the same day as the consent form or it can be done on another day that the patient is coming for a regular dialysis session. This trial session is designed to find out whether the patient can tolerate the compression of the ACES and whether his/her SBP and heart rate can be significantly altered by the compression. Over the course of this screening trial, the patient will be advised that he can request removal of the ACES whenever he/she wishes.
The patients will undergo a HD treatment as prescribed by their attending nephrologists. The investigators expect that the characteristics of these treatments will have the following general features:
Preparation to start the hemodialysis with ACES
During HD Control and ACES session if the patient experiences IDH or SBP drop If the study investigators deem that the patient is experiencing symptoms of IDH or sees that the SBP drops 20 mm Hg, then a charted course will be used on what countermeasures are to be employed.
Post-dialytic care and data collection • Post dialytic procedure and care will include:
o Removal of the ACES and one more BP and pulse measurement,
o Discharge of the patient who is diagnosed as having no PDOH,
o Whether the patient is asked to come back for another HD treatment the next day,
o If the patient is classified as one with PDOH, the procedure to discharge the patient as prescribed by the physician will be followed. If it is prescribed to take a standing up test, it will be done with the ACES on. If the patient is to be sent home, then the ACES will be taken off the patient and another standing up test be done. If the patient is to be sent to an emergency center, then the physician will make a decision on whether to send the patient with the ACES on or with it off.
If the following complications develop while the ACES is in use the device will be removed • A decrease in toe O2 saturation below 90%, • An increase in leg circumference by more than 10% to indicate leg edema,
The study team will investigate whether the complications result from abdominal compression imposed by the ACES. If ACES is deemed as the cause, then the ACES will be decompressed. When the level of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) alanine aminotransferase (ALT) become available to Global Monitor, Inc. and is found to be higher than the norm, then a retrospective analysis will be made to determine whether the level increase relates to the use of ACES.
V. Data and Safety Monitoring Plan An adverse event will be considered any undesirable sign, symptom or medical or psychological condition even if the event is not considered to be related to the investigational drug/device/intervention. Medical condition/diseases present before starting the investigational drug/intervention will be considered adverse events only if they worsen after starting study treatment/intervention. An adverse event is also any undesirable and unintended effect of research occurring in human patients as a result of the collection of identifiable private information under the research. Adverse events also include any problems associated with the use of an investigational device that adversely affects the rights, safety or welfare of patients.
The symptoms or disease developments described as the exclusion criteria (i.e. beyond the first six) will be considered as adverse effect. The symptoms or excessive decrease in SBP, for example, that are normally associated with hypotension development and are found to be common in HD patients of UVa clinics will be reported but not considered as adverse event and not used as a trigger to discontinue the ACES session.
The adverse event will be reported to FDA in a case report form.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The ACES will be used for HD patients who have had IDH episodes in the last month. For these patients, the ACES will impose a compression pressure of 15 mmHg to compress the abdominal section over the last three hours of the HD treatment. This action can increase venous return and hence cardiac output to improve the cardiovascular function of the patient. In this way, the IDH episode may be prevented or reduced in severity. This use is much less cumbersome over the use of IAB in dealing with PDOH. We perform this trial study to show the use ACES is more effective than the Trendelenburg maneuver or the infusion of isotonic saline, for example.
Other names: ACES
Time frame: 4 hours of each HD session
This is an efficacy measure of the use of ACES to alleviate IDH. The investigators count the number of sessions with IDH and non-IDH sessions for the control ones and ACES sessions and use the Chi-square analysis to answer whether there is a significant reduction in the occurrence frequency of IDH. The investigators will examine in a similar way the counts based on the IDH development in the four hourly periods within a HD treatment for controls and those with ACES.
Time frame: 4 hours for each HD session
One blood sample is taken before the start of the HD session and the other at the end of the session. The investigators then measure the ALT and AST level of the samples. A student paired t-test will be used to examine whether the use of ACES increases the level of ALT and AST. If the result indicates insignificant increase, the investigators can then conclude that the use of ACES imposes no damage to the liver.
Time frame: 4 hours
A student paired t-test will be used to examine whether the use of ACES alters the these weights beyond the control ones.
Time frame: 4 hours
This is an assessment on the effectiveness of HD process and on whether it is affected with the use of ACES. A student paired t-test will be used.
Time frame: 4 hours
This is an assessment on the effectiveness of ACES on whether it reduces the need to call for additional countermeasures. A student t-test will be used to analyze the number data.
Time frame: 4 hours
This is an assessment on the effectiveness of HD process and on whether it is affected with the use of ACES. On the latter, a student paired t-test will be used to compare the difference between prescribed and delivered time to find out whether the difference is altered for the ACES session.
Time frame: 4 hours
This is an assessment on the effectiveness of HD process and on whether the set Kt/V is achieved for ACES sessions. A student paired t-test will be used.
Time frame: at 4 hours after the HD session
The recovery time will be considered as a quality assessment of the HD treatment. By a student paired t-test, we may find out whether the use of ACES will lead to faster recovery for the patients.
Time frame: 4 hours
These parameters, in the form of yes or no, are subjectively provided by the patient for the investigators to assess whether the ACES will induce discomfort to the patient taking HD and whether they want to use ACES again.
Global Monitors, Inc.
Industry
A Study of the Use of Abdominal Compression Elastic Support (ACES) for Hemodialysis Patients
Acronym: ACES
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05936710
Cardiovascular Diseases, Hypotension
Béthune, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07022847
Cardiovascular Diseases, Chronic Disease
Wuhu, Anhui, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07545629
Chronic Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage IV (Severe)
Wuhu, Anhui, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05092165
Acute Kidney Injury, Female Urogenital Diseases
São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial Details