Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03632187

Abatacept in earLy Onset Polymyalgia Rheumatica: Study ALORS

Polymyalgia rheumatic (PMR) is a frequent inflammatory disease. It affects the elderly, with peak incidences at the age of 70 to 80 years; an age >50 years or older, is considered a criterion for the diagnosis. Polymyalgia rheumatica occurs at a frequency that is 3 to 10 times that of giant-cell arteritis. Disease risk varies according to race and geographic region. The incidence is highest among whites in northern European populations (about 20 cases per 100,000 persons older than 50 years of age); it is lower in southern European populations (about 10 cases per 100,000).The diagnosis is based on established ACR/EULAR classification criteria.

Long term low-dose glucocorticoid (GCs) (prednisone or prednisolone started at 15 to 20 mg/day progressively tapered) is the mainstay of the treatment.

The activity of PMR is evaluated using the PMR-AS, a disease activity score based on morning stiffness, ability to elevate the upper limbs, physician's global disease assessment and pain assessment measured by the patient using VAS, and the C-reactive protein (CRP) level. The PMR-AS is considered as relevant to define relapse and remission but also to decide if treatment have to be decreased, unchanged or increased (PMR-AS < 10: decrease, PMR-AS > 17 increase to previous dosage, 10 ≤ PMR-AS ≤ 17: stable dose)..

Comorbidity in PMR are due to GCs and 30% of the patients underwent a relapse when tapering GCs. If the investigators able to start prednisone at a lower dosage (i.e. 8 mg then tapered for 3 to 4 months), the cumulative dosage of steroid would not have major side effects but it is not possible without new therapeutic agents.

The TENOR study (Tolerance and Efficacy of tocilizumab iN pOlymyalgia Rheumatica), a phase 2 study, demonstrated efficacy of tocilizumab as first line treatment in PMR without GCs and its ability to spare GCs. This was the first study demonstrating that a biologic may improve PMR without steroid, and that also showed that a short treatment by biologic followed by a low dose GCs therapy may be a new concept in the treatment of PMR.

Molecular studies in GCA and PMR suggest that dendritic cells initiate the pathogenic cascade and recruit T cells. Two major immune-response networks have been identified related to type 1 helper T-cell (Th1) and to helper T-cell (Th17). Abatacept is comprised of the ligand-binding domain of CTLA4 plus modified Fc domain derived from IgG1. By containing CTLA4, abatacept blocks the engagement of CD28 with its ligand, thereby inhibiting T cell activation. It has recently demonstrated its efficacy in Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) but also in giant cell arteritis (GCA). Due to its good safety profile in rheumatoid arthritis and its potential to modulate T cell activation and derived cytokines, abatacept is an attractive agent to investigate in patients with PMR.

In this randomized prospective placebo controlled study, the objective is to demonstrate the ability of abatacept to improve alone PMR and then to allow a steroid sparing effect after this induction treatment, in early onset PMR.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

50 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

CHRU de Brest, Brest, France

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age older than 50 years
  • Fulfilling ACR/EULAR criteria
  • Disease duration≤6 months
  • No steroid since 2 weeks prior randomization
  • PMR-AS≥ 17
  • Absence of signs or symptoms of other musculoskeletal or connective tissue conditions
  • Able to give informed consent
  • Concomitant treatments with methotrexate or hydroxychloroquine are not permitted.

Exclusion criteria

  • Clinical symptoms of giant cell arteritis
  • Uncontrolled high blood pressure or cardiovascular disease
  • Clinical evidence of significant unstable or uncontrolled acute or chronic diseases not due to PMR
  • Planned surgical procedure or medical history, blood abnormalities or any clinical condition that compromises inclusion
  • History of malignant neoplasm within the last 5 years.
  • Current active infection not controlled
  • Detailed exclusion criteria related to prior or concomitant therapy, general safety and laboratory data are reported in the protocol

Treatment and study plan

Abatacept

Drug

Subcutaneous abatacept every weeks during 3 months

Placebos

Drug

Subcutaneous placebo every week during 3 months

Primary outcomes

  1. Following of one biological parameter (CRP)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    The Polymyalgia Rheumatica Activity score is evaluated with a biological parameter named CRP.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Emergence of adverse events (Safety and tolerability)

    Time frame: 36 weeks

    The safety is evaluated with the adverse events in both arms

  2. Following of the Polymyalgia Rheumatica Activity score

    Time frame: 36 weeks

    The Polymyalgia Rheumatica Activity score is evalauted with CRP and without CRP. The activity of Polymyalgia Rheumatica is evaluated using the Polymyalgia Rheumatica Activity score (PMR-AS), a disease activity score based on morning stiffness, ability to elevate the upper limbs, physician's global disease assessment and pain assessment measured by the patient using VAS, and the C-reactive protein (CRP) level. The PMR-AS is considered as relevant to define relapse and remission but also to decide if treatment have to be decreased, unchanged or increased (PMR-AS < 10: decrease, PMR-AS > 17 increase to previous dosage, 10 ≤ PMR-AS ≤ 17: stable dose)

  3. Medical resource evaluation

    Time frame: 36 weeks

    The cost of the utilization of Abatacept is evaluated

  4. Following of the cumulative dosages of Glucocorticoids

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    The cumulative dosages of GCs is evaluated

  5. The flare of the Polymyalgia Rheumatica

    Time frame: 36 weeks

    The flare of the Polymyalgia Rheumatica will be evaluate by the activity of Polymyalgia Rheumatica which is evaluated using the Polymyalgia Rheumatica Activity score ( (PMR-AS) which is not a scale but a score based on morning stiffness, ability to elevate the upper limbs, physician's global disease assessment and pain assessment measured by the patient using VAS, and the C-reactive protein (CRP) level. The PMR-AS is considered as relevant to define relapse and remission but also to decide if treatment have to be decreased, unchanged or increased (PMR-AS < 10: decrease, PMR-AS > 17 increase to previous dosage, 10 ≤ PMR-AS ≤ 17: stable dose).

  6. Following of the medical exam using the ultrasound Scoring

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    The ultrasound scoring of synovitis and tenosynovitis is evaluated

  7. Evaluation of FDG uptake using TEP-scanner in RegiOns of Interest

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    The FDG uptake is evalated with TEP-scanner using the FDG radiotracer

  8. Following the proportion of patients relapse

    Time frame: 36 weeks

    The proportion of patients relapse or remission is evaluated with the Polymyalgia Rheumatica Activity score>17

  9. Biological markers

    Time frame: 36 weeks

    The level of biological markers and cell subpopulations with the result of blood test is evaluated.

    The list of biological markers is (Interleukin, cytokines, immune cells)

  10. Following of the quality of life

    Time frame: 36 weeks

    The Short Form 36 (SF36) is used to evaluate the quality of life. The SF36 scale includes 36 items divided into 8 dimensions (physical functioning, role limitations related to physical health, physical pain, general health, vitality [energy / fatigue].

  11. Following of the quality of life

    Time frame: 36 weeks

    The scale EuroQol 5 dimensions (EDQ5) is used to evaluate the quality of life. The EQ-5D scale is a standardised measure of health status to provide a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal, whih is divided by the EQ-5D descriptive system (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) and the EQ Visual Analogue scale (EQ VAS). Each dimension has 5 levels (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems).

  12. Following of the quality of life

    Time frame: 36 weeks

    The Hospital Anxiety and the Depression scale (HAD) is used to evaluate the quality of life.

    The HAD scale has 14 items rated from 0 to 3 with 7 questions relate to anxiety and 7 others to the depressive dimension.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Brest

Other

Collaborators

  • Bristol-Myers Squibb

Registry information

Official study title

To Demonstrate the Ability of Abatacept in Comparison to Placebo to Obtain a Low Disease Activity [PMR-AS (CRP) Lower or Equal to 10] Without GCs (Prednisone or Prednisolone) at Week 12 in Early Onset PMR Patients.

Acronym: ALORS

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2022
First posted
Aug 15, 2018
Registry last updated
Jun 8, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.