Hospital for Special Surgery
New York, 10021, United States
NCT Number: NCT04467983
This randomized open label clinical trial will evaluate the effect of continued denosumab alone over 18 months versus denosumab with added abaloparatide for 18 months. 70 postmenopausal women will be enrolled over a period of 18 months. The co-primary outcomes will be group differences in bone mineral density (BMD) of the total hip and lumbar spine at 18 months. Secondary outcomes will include group differences in bone mineral density (BMD) at the femoral neck, trochanter and wrist sites at 6, 12 and 18 months, spine and total hip bone mineral density (BMD) at 6 and 12 months and trabecular bone score (TBS) at 18 months. Secondary outcomes will also include within group changes from baseline for each of these variables. Bone turnover markers will also be measured to demonstrate that PINP levels will increase with administration of abaloparatide even in the setting of ongoing denosumab, while CTX levels will remain low.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
45 year and older
Female
Interventional
Phase 4
New York, 10021, United States
Some women on denosumab treatment for osteoporosis remain at high risk for fracture. These include women who sustain incident fractures on denosumab and those who have declining bone mineral density (BMD) or persistently low bone mineral density (BMD), despite treatment. There are few options available for these patients. Denosumab withdrawal is associated with dramatic increased bone remodeling, rapid prominent bone loss, and multiple vertebral fractures (Cummings JBMR 2017). Switching from denosumab to teriparatide is associated with substantial BMD loss in the hip and femoral neck. After 2 years of denosumab treatment, when women are switched to teriparatide, total hip BMD remains below the baseline (at end of denosumab treatment) over the entire 2 years of teriparatide treatment (Leder Lancet 2015).
Abaloparatide might be a better option than teriparatide in patients switching from denosumab, because it is less pro-resorptive than teriparatide, however, hip BMD will still likely decline. Alternatively, adding abaloparatide to ongoing denosumab might be an excellent treatment option for these women. One of the investigators has previously shown that adding teriparatide to ongoing alendronate results in improved BMD and bone strength, compared to switching to teriparatide (Cosman JCEM 2009 and Cosman JBMR 2013). Others have shown that co-administration of teriparatide and denosumab to treatment naïve women increases BMD more than either agent alone (Tsai Lancet 2013, Leder et al JCEM 2014). Based on both of these observations, the investigators believe that adding abaloparatide to continued denosumab treatment will allow bone formation to increase, without increasing bone resorption (modeling-based bone formation) and will produce substantial BMD increments in both spine and hip.
Hypothesis: In women who still appear to be at high risk for fracture while receiving ongoing denosumab therapy, adding abaloparatide will increase BMD of the lumbar spine and total hip significantly more than continuing denosumab alone.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Denosumab alone: 3 injections of Denosumab at appropriate times, separated by no more than 7 months from the last treatment.
Other names: Prolia
Combination therapy: 3 injections of Denosumab at appropriate times, separated by no more than 7 months from the last treatment, with added abaloparatide 80 mcg subcutaneously daily, started within 6 months of the last denosumab treatment, for a total of 18 months.
Other names: Tymlos
Time frame: 18 months
Group differences in BMD increment at total hip and lumbar spine at 18 months.
Time frame: 6, 12, 18 months
Group Differences in BMD increments:
of lumbar spine and total hip at 6 and 12 months. of femoral neck, and 1/3 radius at 6, 12 and 18 months.
Group Differences in BMD increments:
of lumbar spine and total hip at 6 and 12 months. of femoral neck, and 1/3 radius at 6, 12 and 18 months.
Group Differences in BMD increments:
of lumbar spine and total hip at 6 and 12 months. of femoral neck, and 1/3 radius at 6, 12 and 18 months. Group differences in BMD increments of lumbar spine and total hip (at 6 and 12 months) and of femoral neck and 1/3 distal radius (at 6, 12, and 18 months)
Time frame: 18 months
Group differences in Trabecular Bone Score at 18 months
Time frame: 6, 12, 18 months
Within Group Increments in bone mineral density vs baseline of lumbar spine (at 6, 12, and 18 months) and of total hip, femoral neck, and distal 1/3 radius (at 6, 12, and 18 months)
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18 months
Within and between group differences in biochemical bone turnover markers (P1NP and CTX) at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05575167
Bone Diseases, Bone Diseases, Metabolic
Lille, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05058976
Bone Diseases, Bone Diseases, Metabolic
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05655013
Bone Diseases, Bone Diseases, Metabolic
Aarhus, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT03623633
Bone Diseases, Bone Diseases, Metabolic
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details