A Validation of Current Hospital Triage Performance System Versus RETTS

Background: Triage in the emergency department (ED) together with initial assessment is used to identify patient's level of urgency and treatment based on their triage level. Triage in the ED is a complex decision-making process, and several triage scales have been designed as decision support systems to guide the triage nurse to a correct decision. Worldwide there are four well known five-level triage systems in use. In 2010, 97% of all EDs in Sweden introduced a process-oriented triage scale with physiological parameters called Rapid Emergency Traige and Treatment System (RETTS). RETTS has two main assessment variables: vital signs and chief complaints, which describe the incident or symptoms that caused the patient to seek care. These two variables are evaluated and results in a color coded 5-level scale. Each level of priority has a defined time limit within which evaluation by a doctor should begin. Although, all international triage system guidelines seem to function well in western countries, they are difficult to implement and have a high failure rate in developing low-income countries. One of the reasons may be the lack of extensive training. Teaching and assessing abilities in performing mass casualty triage in inherently challenging due to the inability to accurately replicate a given disaster environment in a comprehensive way. Disaster drills and simulation exercises are ways of training triage performance and there are different tools available. One tool that can contribute to this kind of training may be the Emergo Train System® (ETS). ETS or similar interactive educational simulation systems could be used to test and evaluate incident and command systems, surge capacity, hospital preparedness and triage.

Study objective study III: The aim of the study is to validate the currently practiced system for triage in the ED in Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital in Eldoret, Kenya with RETTS. Furthermore map the current patient outcome of trauma patients.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Wound and Injuries Trauma Wounds and Injuries

Age range

14 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital, Kenya.

Eldoret, 30100, Kenya

About this study

A tool has been developed by the research group. It has been developed in which on identification of trauma patient record, details will be entered and later transferred to an Excel format for ease of analysis.

Trauma patient card record for collecting data including respiratory rate, pulse, blood pressure, GCS, SaO2, body temperature, type of injury and mechanism of injury is developed will be used. Time of accident and arrival to ED, sex, age and intervention at ED will also be registered. Time at ED, number of days and where the patient has been treated during the hospital visit are also going to be registered. According to the protocol there is also a discharge evaluation where The International Classification of Disease (ICD) and Injury Severity Score (ISS) will be registered.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Close to 600 trauma patients of ages 14 and above seen at the ED will be captured. All patients presenting through the ED will be identified and those who meet the inclusion criteria will be recruited into the study on a daily basis until close to the 600 patient records is achieved. Patients will be followed through the ED to the receiving facilities (wards, ICU, HDU, theatre etc) -

Exclusion criteria

Those brought in dead, those below 14 years, revisits, or referred patients will be excluded The patient records will be traced for the entire period the patient is in the hospital or until key decisions are made on triage category by the ED or receiving units.

There may be need to follow up patients for longer but since the study has a limited period, records will have to be made up to 30 days admission for those admitted during the last month.

Treatment and study plan

Mapping

Other

Mapping of current triage situation regarding 30 days mortality

Primary outcomes

Identify and mapping of the current 30 days mortality and morbidity.

Time frame: 30 days

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Linkoeping

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Validation of Current Hospital Triage Performance System Versus RETTS and Identify Trauma Patient Outcome at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital, Kenya.

Acronym: HTPS

Important dates

Study start: 2014
Primary completion: 2015
Study completion: 2015
First posted: Dec 1, 2014
Registry last updated: Sep 29, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.

Completed