Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03641521

A Trial to Increase Child Vegetable Intake Through Behavioral Strategies

A community nutrition trial among a diverse low-income population that tested the effect of parent-child cooking nutrition intervention on vegetable intake among 9-12 children.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Obesity, Childhood Body Weight Nutrition Disorders Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases Obesity Overnutrition Overweight Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Pediatric Obesity Signs and Symptoms

Age range

9 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

This study was a nonrandomized, controlled trial to determine whether a series of 6 weekly parent-child vegetable cooking skills classes and parent-led strategies informed by behavioral economics (1/week) (intervention group) improved dietary and non-dietary outcomes of a racially and ethnically diverse sample of low-income children (ages 9-12) more than a vegetable cooking skills program alone (control group).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participant child must be 9-12 years old
  • Parent must be the main food preparer for the household
  • The family must qualify for some form of public assistance
  • Have a phone
  • Must not have participated in a previous Cooking Matters for Families in the past 3 years
  • Be able to read, speak, and understand English (or Spanish for Spanish-only courses).

Exclusion criteria

*No exclusions other than those that do not meet inclusion criteria

Treatment and study plan

Parent-led behavioral strategies

Behavioral

Intervention parents participated in an additional 20-25-min segment led by the nutrition educator during which the week's behavioral strategy was introduced. The following six behavioral strategies were introduced (one each week) as a segment of each cooking skills session: 1) have your child help prepare vegetables for meals (Child Help), 2) use a plate that shows the amount of vegetables to include for a meal (My Plate), 3) make vegetables visible and accessible by removing other foods from the dining area during the meal and leaving the vegetables (Make Avail/Visible), 4) serve at least 2 vegetables with the meal (Serve 2), 5) serve vegetables before the meal (Serve First), and 6) use a bigger spoon to serve the vegetables (Big Spoon).

Primary outcomes

  1. change in # of vegetable servings consumed by child measured by averaging vegetable serving data extracted from 3, 24-hr recalls.

    Time frame: change from baseline to 9 weeks post-baseline (i.e., immediate post-intervention)

    Number of vegetable servings were assessed from 3, 24-hr dietary recalls, collected by trained study personnel in-person and over the phone from each child, using Nutrition Data System for Research (NDSR®)software). The 3, 24-hr recalls were averaged to come up with an aggregate # of vegetable servings.

  2. change in # of vegetable servings consumed by child measured by averaging vegetable serving data extracted from 3, 24-hr recalls.

    Time frame: change from baseline to 6 months post-baseline

    Number of vegetable servings were assessed from 3, 24-hr dietary recalls, collected by trained study personnel in-person and over the phone from each child, using Nutrition Data System for Research (NDSR®)software). The 3, 24-hr recalls were averaged to come up with an aggregate # of vegetable servings.

  3. change in # of vegetable servings consumed by child measured by averaging vegetable serving data extracted from 3, 24-hr recalls.

    Time frame: change from baseline to 12 months post-baseline

    Number of vegetable servings were assessed from 3, 24-hr dietary recalls, collected by trained study personnel in-person and over the phone from each child, using Nutrition Data System for Research (NDSR®)software). The 3, 24-hr recalls were averaged to come up with an aggregate # of vegetable servings.

Secondary outcomes

  1. change in liking of vegetables by child (liking rating scale was comprised of values across a 10-point labeled hedonic scale (1 -"Hate it" to 5 - "It's okay" to 10 - "Love it"))

    Time frame: change from baseline to 9 weeks post-baseline (i.e., immediate post-intervention)

    Each child rated his/her liking of 37 different vegetables.The liking rating scale was comprised of values across a 10-point labeled hedonic scale (1 -"Hate it" to 5 - "It's okay" to 10 - "Love it"). This type of liking rating scale has been validated for testing with children. (Kroll, B.J. 1990. Evaluating rating scales for sensory testing with children. Food Technology, 44(11), 78-86.) An aggregate vegetable liking score representing mean liking rating across all vegetables was calculated for each child.

  2. change in liking of vegetables by child ( liking rating scale was comprised of values across a 10-point labeled hedonic scale (1 -"Hate it" to 5 - "It's okay" to 10 - "Love it"))

    Time frame: change from baseline to 6-months post baseline

    Each child rated his/her liking of 37 different vegetables.The liking rating scale was comprised of values across a 10-point labeled hedonic scale (1 -"Hate it" to 5 - "It's okay" to 10 - "Love it"). This type of liking rating scale has been validated for testing with children. (Kroll, B.J. 1990. Evaluating rating scales for sensory testing with children. Food Technology, 44(11), 78-86.) An aggregate vegetable liking score representing mean liking rating across all vegetables was calculated for each child.

  3. change in liking of vegetables by child ( liking rating scale was comprised of values across a 10-point labeled hedonic scale (1 -"Hate it" to 5 - "It's okay" to 10 - "Love it"))

    Time frame: change from baseline to 12-months post baseline

    Each child rated his/her liking of 37 different vegetables.The liking rating scale was comprised of values across a 10-point labeled hedonic scale (1 -"Hate it" to 5 - "It's okay" to 10 - "Love it"). This type of liking rating scale has been validated for testing with children. (Kroll, B.J. 1990. Evaluating rating scales for sensory testing with children. Food Technology, 44(11), 78-86.) An aggregate vegetable liking score representing mean liking rating across all vegetables was calculated for each child.

  4. change in number different of vegetables tried by child

    Time frame: change from baseline to 9 weeks post-baseline (i.e., immediate post-intervention)

    Each child was asked the question "Have you ever tried (name of vegetable)" with following response options: Yes/No/Don't know. An aggregate score per child was tabulated by summing all "yes" answers.

  5. change in number different of vegetables tried by child

    Time frame: change from baseline to 6-months post-baseline

    Each child was asked the question "Have you ever tried (name of vegetable)" with following response options: Yes/No/Don't know. An aggregate score per child was tabulated by summing all "yes" answers.

  6. change in number different of vegetables tried by child

    Time frame: change from baseline to 12-months post-baseline

    Each child was asked the question "Have you ever tried (name of vegetable)" with following response options: Yes/No/Don't know. An aggregate score per child was tabulated by summing all "yes" answers.

  7. change in number of available vegetables in the child's home

    Time frame: change from baseline to 9 weeks post-baseline (i.e., immediate post-intervention)

    Each of the child's parent was asked to complete a validated Home Food Inventory developed by Fulkerson and colleagues [Fulkerson JA, Nelson MC, Lytle L, Moe S, Heitzler C, Pasch KE. The validation of a home food inventory. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5:55. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-5-55], to self-report the availability of different vegetables currently in their home. Response options for each question asking if the vegetable was currently in the home were "yes /no/ don't know" . Final number of available vegetables in the home was calculated by summing the number of vegetables for which the parent answered "yes."

  8. change in number of available vegetables in the child's home

    Time frame: change from baseline to 6-months post baseline

    Each of the child's parent was asked to complete a validated Home Food Inventory developed by Fulkerson and colleagues [Fulkerson JA, Nelson MC, Lytle L, Moe S, Heitzler C, Pasch KE. The validation of a home food inventory. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5:55. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-5-55], to self-report the availability of different vegetables currently in their home. Response options for each question asking if the vegetable was currently in the home were "yes /no/ don't know" .Final number of available vegetables in the home was calculated by summing the number of vegetables for which the parent answered "yes."

  9. change in number of available vegetables in the child's home

    Time frame: change from baseline to 12-months post baseline

    Each of the child's parent was asked to complete a validated Home Food Inventory developed by Fulkerson and colleagues [Fulkerson JA, Nelson MC, Lytle L, Moe S, Heitzler C, Pasch KE. The validation of a home food inventory. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5:55. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-5-55], to self-report the availability of different vegetables currently in their home. Response options for each question asking if the vegetable was currently in the home were "yes /no/ don't know" . Final number of available vegetables in the home was calculated by summing the number of vegetables for which the parent answered "yes."

  10. change in child's body mass index (as measured by collected height (m) and weight (kg) from child)

    Time frame: change from baseline to 9 weeks post-baseline (i.e., immediate post-intervention)

    Child Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated from collected height and weight of child that were combined to report BMI in kg/m^2

  11. change in child's body mass index (as measured by collected height (m) and weight (kg) from child)

    Time frame: change from baseline to 6-months post baseline

    Child Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated from collected height and weight of child that were combined to report BMI in kg/m^2

  12. change in child's body mass index (as measured by collected height (m) and weight (kg) from child)

    Time frame: change from baseline to 12-months post baseline

    Child Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated from collected height and weight of child that were combined to report BMI in kg/m^2

  13. change in child's Healthy Eating Index 2010 score (a measure of dietary quality)

    Time frame: change from baseline to immediate post-intervention (i.e, 9 weeks post-baseline)

    Child dietary data was assessed through from 3, 24-hr dietary recalls, collected by trained study personnel in-person and over the phone using Nutrition Data System for Research (NDSR) software.The 3, 24-hr recalls were averaged to come up with an aggregate score for each nutrient. NDSR data was imported into a SAS® program (version 9.4) (SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC 2014), created by National Institutes of Health-NCI, Division of Cancer Control & Population Studies that calculated a Healthy Eating Index 2010 score, a validated measure of dietary quality, for each child (Guenther PM, Casavale KO, Reedy J, Kirkpatrick SI, Hiza HAB, Kuczynski KJ, et al. Update of the Healthy Eating Index: HEI-2010. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113:569-80..

  14. change in child's Healthy Eating Index 2010 score (a measure of dietary quality)

    Time frame: change from baseline to 6-months post baseline

    Child dietary data was assessed through from 3, 24-hr dietary recalls, collected by trained study personnel in -person and over the phone using Nutrition Data System for Research (NDSR) software.The 3, 24-hr recalls were averaged to come up with an aggregate score for each nutrient. NDSR data was imported into a SAS® program (version 9.4) (SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC 2014), created by National Institutes of Health-NCI, Division of Cancer Control & Population Studies that calculated a Healthy Eating Index 2010 score, a validated measure of dietary quality, for each child.

  15. change in child's Healthy Eating Index 2010 score (a measure of dietary quality)

    Time frame: change from baseline to 12-months post baseline

    Child dietary data was assessed through from 3, 24-hr dietary recalls, collected by trained study personnel in -person and over the phone using Nutrition Data System for Research (NDSR) software.The 3, 24-hr recalls were averaged to come up with an aggregate score for each nutrient. NDSR data was imported into a SAS® program (version 9.4) (SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC 2014), created by National Institutes of Health-NCI, Division of Cancer Control & Population Studies that calculated a Healthy Eating Index 2010 score, a validated measure of dietary quality, for each child.

  16. change in child's dietary energy (in kilocalories) intake

    Time frame: change from baseline to 9 weeks post-baseline (i.e., immediate post-intervention)

    Child dietary data was assessed through from 3, 24-hr dietary recalls, collected by trained study personnel in -person and over the phone using Nutrition Data System for Research (NDSR) software.The 3, 24-hr recalls were averaged to come up with an aggregate score for each nutrient (e.g., dietary energy in kilocalories)

  17. change in child's dietary energy (in kilocalories) intake

    Time frame: change from baseline to 6-months post-baseline

    Child dietary data was assessed through from 3, 24-hr dietary recalls, collected by trained study personnel in -person and over the phone using Nutrition Data System for Research (NDSR) software.The 3, 24-hr recalls were averaged to come up with an aggregate score for each nutrient (e.g., dietary energy in kilocalories)

  18. change in child's dietary energy (in kilocalories) intake

    Time frame: change from baseline to 12-months post-baseline

    Child dietary data was assessed through from 3, 24-hr dietary recalls, collected by trained study personnel in -person and over the phone using Nutrition Data System for Research (NDSR) software.The 3, 24-hr recalls were averaged to come up with an aggregate score for each nutrient (e.g., dietary energy in kilocalories)

  19. change in child cooking skills self-efficacy as measured by a validated survey to measure child cooking self-efficacy

    Time frame: change from baseline to 9 weeks post-baseline (i.e., immediate post-intervention)

    Child cooking skills self-efficacy was measured using scales that have shown internal consistency and test-retest reliability in a psychometric evaluation of a cooking-based nutrition education intervention among low-income 9-11 year old children (Cronbach α = ≥ 0.74, test-retest r ≥ 0.66).(Lohse B, Cunningham-Sabo L, Walters LM, Stacey JE. Valid and Reliable Measures of Cognitive Behaviors toward Fruits and Vegetables for Children Aged 9 to 11 Years. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2011;43:42-49. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2009.12.006). Response options for the child self-efficacy questions: 1 = YES! - 5 = NO!). The child-self-efficacy scale was calculated by summing 8 items measuring self-efficacy. A lower score indicated greater self-efficacy and more positive attitudes toward cooking.

  20. change in adult cooking skills confidence as measured by a validated survey to measure adult cooking confidence. Response options for the cooking confidence questions: (4 items, 1 = not at all confident - 5 = very confident).

    Time frame: change from baseline to 9 weeks post-baseline (i.e., immediate post-intervention)

    Parents completed the Cooking Matters for Families Before and After Course Survey to assess change in cooking skills confidence. Internal consistency and ability of the scales to reflect positive self-reported changes were previously among low-income adults (Pinard CA, Uvena LM, Quam JB, Smith TM, Yaroch AL. Development and testing of a revised cooking matters for adults survey. Am J Health Behav. 2015;39(6):866-873. doi:10.5993/AJHB.39.6.14). Response options for the 4 cooking confidence questions: (4 items, 1 = not at all confident - 5 = very confident). An aggregate score for each parent was tabulated by averaging the 4 questions. A higher score indicated greater cooking skills confidence.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Minnesota

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Controlled-intervention Trial to Increase Child Vegetable Intake Through Parent-implemented Behavioral Strategies

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Aug 22, 2018
Registry last updated
Jul 12, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.