Nucleos(t)ide (NUC)
DrugNucleos(t)ide (NUC) will be administered orally
NCT Number: NCT04225715
This is a study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of New Molecular Entity (NME) combination therapies in Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) participants with preserved liver function and without significant fibrosis/cirrhosis. The platform design allows comparison of multiple NME combination therapies against a common control, and introduction of additional treatment arms at later study time points. Each arm will consist of a screening phase (up to 8 weeks), treatment phase (up to 48 weeks) and post-treatment follow-up phase (48 weeks). The safety and efficacy will be monitored throughout the study.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Tokuda Hospital Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Nucleos(t)ide (NUC) will be administered orally
CpAM (RO7049389) will be administered orally
Other names: Linvencorvir, RG7907
TLR7 (RO7020531) will be administered orally
Other names: Ruzotolimod, RG7854
siRNA (RO7445482) will be administered subcutaneously
Other names: Xalnesiran, RG6346
PEG-IFN will be administered subcutaneously
Other names: Pegasys®
PD-L1 LNA (RO7191863) will be administered subcutaneously
Other names: Cadapersen, RG6084
Time frame: Follow-up Week (FUW) 24
HBsAg loss was defined as quantitative HBsAg <0.05 international units/milliliters (IU/mL). The percentage of participants with HBsAg loss was calculated as number of participants with HBsAg loss / total number of participants *100. 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages have been rounded off.
Time frame: Combos 1 and 5: Weeks 24, 36, 48 and FUW 48; Combos 2, 3, 4, 6 and NUC Arm: Week 48 and FUW 48; Combo 7: Week 24; Combo 8: Week 36
HBsAg loss was defined as quantitative HBsAg <0.05 IU/mL. The percentage of participants with HBsAg loss was calculated as number of participants with HBsAg loss / total number of participants *100. 95% CI was calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages have been rounded off.
Time frame: Combos 1 and 5: Weeks 24, 36, 48, FUW 24 and FUW 48; Combos 2, 3, 4, 6 and NUC Arm: Week 48, FUW 24 and FUW 48; Combo 7: Week 24 and FUW 24; Combo 8: Week 36 and FUW 24
HBsAg seroconversion was defined as a quantitative HBsAg < 0.05 IU/mL and a positive anti-HBs antibody (defined as per assay reactive threshold anti-HBs ≥10 IU/L). 95% CI was calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages have been rounded off.
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48; FUW 12, 24, 36, and 48
HBeAg loss was defined as negative /non-reactive HBeAg level. Percentages have been rounded off.
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48; FUW 12, 24, 36, and 48
HBeAg seroconversion was defined as a negative /non-reactive HBeAg level and a positive anti-HBe antibody. Percentages have been rounded off.
Time frame: FUW 12, 24, 36, and 48
Chronic HBV infection is characterized by high levels of circulating HBV DNA. Therefore, HBV levels are indicative of virological response. At screening participants were on NUC therapy and had circulating HBV DNA levels below the assay LLOQ or below 20 IU/mL for at least 6 months. The emergence of a virological breakthrough (HBV DNA >100 IU/mL or >1 log increase from nadir) while on NUC therapy, or the emergence of a virological relapse (>2,000 IU/mL) in participants taken off NME combination and NUC therapy during follow-up, was monitored through the quantification of HBV DNA in plasma.
Time frame: HBsAg, Anti-HBs, HBeAg & HBV RNA: Combo 1 to 6 and NUC arm: Weeks 24, 36, 48, FUW 24 and FUW 48; Combo 7: Week 24, FUW 24 & FUW 48; Combo 8: Weeks 24, 36, FUW 24 & FUW 48; HBV DNA: FUW 24 and FUW 48
The serological markers of HBV infection include viral antigens (HBsAg & HBeAg) and antibody (anti-HBs). Changes in serological markers and efficacy biomarkers (HBV RNA) from baseline are reported. Change from baseline for HBV DNA was assessed in 'ON NUC' participants.
Time frame: Predose on Day 1 and up to 168 hours post dose (Week 1)
The AUC was predicted and summarized by modelling & simulation via the population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) method based on pre and post dose samples. As per planned analysis data was collected and reported in a pooled manner for Combos 7 and 8.
Time frame: Predose on Day 1 and up to 168 hours post dose (Week 1)
The Cmax was predicted and summarized by modelling & simulation via the PopPK method based on pre and post dose samples. As per planned analysis data was collected and reported in a pooled manner for Combos 7 and 8.
Time frame: Predose on Day 1 of Week 12 up to 168 hours post dose (Week 12)
The AUC was predicted and summarized by modelling & simulation via the PopPK method based on pre and post dose samples. As per planned analysis data was collected and reported in a pooled manner for Combos 7 and 8.
Time frame: Predose on Day 1 of Week 12 up to 168 hours post dose (Week 12)
The Cmax was predicted and summarized by modelling & simulation via the PopPK method based on pre and post dose samples. As per planned analysis data was collected and reported in a pooled manner for Combos 7 and 8.
Time frame: Predose on Day 1 and 1-3 and 4-6 hours post dose each day, up to Day 28
The AUC was predicted and summarized by modelling & simulation via the PopPK method based on pre and post dose samples.
Time frame: Predose on Day 1 and 1-3 and 4-6 hours post dose each day, up to Day 28
The Cmax was predicted and summarized by modelling & simulation via the PopPK method based on pre and post dose samples.
Time frame: From Day 29 up to Day 56
The AUC tau was predicted and summarized by modelling & simulation via the PopPK method based on pre and post dose samples. Simulations for the dosing interval between Day 29 and Day 56 was done using population PK modeling informed by sparse PK samples collected on Days 1, 85, 169, 253, and 337 at predose, 1-3 hours, and 4-6 hours post dose.
Time frame: From Day 29 up to Day 56
The Cmax was predicted and summarized by modelling & simulation via the PopPK method based on pre and post dose samples. Simulations for the dosing interval between Day 29 and Day 56 was done using population PK modeling informed by sparse PK samples collected on Days 1, 85, 169, 253, and 337 at predose, 1-3 hours, and 4-6 hours post dose.
Time frame: Predose and 1-3 and 4-6 hours post-dose on Days 1, 3, 5 on Weeks 12 and 36
The AUC was predicted and summarized by modelling & simulation via the PopPK method based on pre and post dose samples.
Time frame: Predose and 1-3 and 4-6 hours post-dose on Days 1, 3, 5 on Weeks 12 and 36
The Cmax was predicted and summarized by modelling & simulation via the PopPK method based on pre and post dose samples.
Time frame: From Day 1 up to end of 48 weeks of follow up (up to approximately 1.8 years)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory values or abnormal clinical test results), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product.
Time frame: From Day 1 up to end of follow up (up to approximately 4 years)
Treatment-emergent anti drug antibody (ADA) was defined as participants who seroconverted or experienced a boost in preexisting ADA during the study. Participants were considered to be ADA positive if they were ADA negative or had missing data at baseline but develop an ADA response following study drug administration (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples were greater than the titer of the baseline sample by a scientifically reasonable margin such as at least 4-fold (treatment-enhanced ADA response).
Time frame: From Day 1 for Combo 7 and 8 up to end of follow up (Up to approximately 2 years)
Treatment-emergent ADA was defined as participants who seroconverted or experienced a boost in preexisting ADA during the study. Participants were considered to be ADA positive if they were ADA negative or had missing data at baseline but develop an ADA response following study drug administration (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples were greater than the titer of the baseline sample by a scientifically reasonable margin such as at least 4-fold (treatment-enhanced ADA response).
Hoffmann-La Roche
Industry
A Phase II, Randomised, Adaptive, Open-Label Platform Trial To Evaluate Efficacy And Safety Of Multiple Combination Therapies In Participants With Chronic Hepatitis B
Acronym: Piranga
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04782375
Blood-Borne Infections, Chronic Disease
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT04749368
Blood-Borne Infections, Chronic Disease
Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT05630820
Blood-Borne Infections, Chronic Disease
Centreville, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05630807
Blood-Borne Infections, Chronic Disease
Chandler, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details