Department of Food and Drug, University of Parma
Parma, 43125, Italy
NCT Number: NCT03104712
Pasta and rice are two of the most commonly consumed grains worldwide, where the former has a low GI (e.g. spaghetti) and the latter, usually (as it depends on the type) has a higher GI (e.g. white rice). The most typical ways in which pasta and rice are consumed are with the addition of oil or tomato sauce, and are recommended to be consumed in this way in the Mediterranean diet. The Mediterranean diet has been demonstrated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease, improve glycemic control and is encouraged in many clinical guidelines globally for both cardiovascular risk reduction. Some studies have explored the differences in glycemic response of different carbohydrate foods consumed with the addition of fat demonstrating that the glycemic response is indeed reduced.However, the GI may remain of importance even when other means to reduce glycemic response are introduced.
The investigators therefore designed a randomized controlled crossover study to explore whether the addition of fat in the form of commonly consumed sauces which are recommended as part of a Mediterranean diet, affects the difference in glycemic response between a commonly consumed low GI and a higher GI carbohydrate food.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Parma, 43125, Italy
Background:
Pasta and rice are two of the most commonly consumed grains worldwide, where the former has a low GI (e.g. spaghetti) and the latter, usually (as it depends on the type) has a higher GI (e.g. white rice). Low GI foods have been demonstrated to improve glycemic control, insulin sensitivity and diabetes management, and have been associated with reduced risk of chronic disease, including coronary heart disease. Therefore, GI is of importance as a potential dietary strategy to reduce postprandial glycemia and improve glycemic control, particularly with the increasing rates of diabetes.
Several studies have demonstrated how the addition of fat to a meal can reduce the glycemic response, some of which have suggested in a dose response manner. The mechanism by which increasing fat reduces the glycemic response may be through the effects on gastric emptying. Fat may modulate the gut hormones cholecystokinin (CCK) and peptide YY, which delay gastric emptying, which is known to be a major determinant of postprandial glycemia where small changes can have a substantial effect. Low GI foods result in lower glycemic excursions compared to higher GI foods, which, in addition to gastric emptying, may exert this effect through various pathways. Thus, there is importance of exploring the potential additional benefit beyond reducing the glycemic response with the addition of fat.
The most typical ways in which pasta and rice are consumed are with the addition of oil or tomato sauce, and are recommended to be consumed in this way in the Mediterranean diet. Among many benefits, the Mediterranean diet has been demonstrated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease, improved glycemic control and is encouraged in many clinical guidelines globally for both cardiovascular risk reduction and for diabetes. Some studies have explored the differences in glycemic response of different carbohydrate foods consumed with the addition of fat demonstrating that the glycemic response is indeed reduced.However, the GI may remain of importance even when other means to reduce glycemic response are introduced.
The investigators therefore designed a randomized controlled crossover study to explore whether the addition of fat in the form of commonly consumed sauces which are recommended as part of a Mediterranean diet, affects the difference in glycemic response between a commonly consumed low GI and a higher GI carbohydrate food.
Objective:
To assess whether the addition of fat to a low GI and higher GI carbohydrate food lowers the glycemic response equivalently, thus whether the difference between the low and higher GI food is preserved.
Scope:
The principal scope of the study is to evaluate the impact of two carbohydrate-containing foods varying in glycemic index, spaghetti and rice, on postprandial glucose.
To confirm that the two foods vary in GI, the GI of the rice will first be tested in Part A, since the GI of spaghetti has already been determined in the investigator's lab.
In Part B of the study, following the consumption of the test foods by healthy volunteers (see Study Design), the investigators will evaluate the differences in postprandial glucose, as well as insulin and c-peptide.
Implications:
These results will determine whether there is an independent effect of the GI of a carbohydrate containing food when fat is added to a meal in the context of how is it commonly and recommended to be consumed. These results may be useful to encourage the use of low GI foods for greater improvements in glycemic and insulinemic control, which is an important public health concern in today's global society.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
50g available carbohydrate
Other names: Glucose Monohydrate
50g available carbohydrate
Other names: Glucose Monohydrate
50g available carbohydrate
Other names: Glucose Monohydrate
50g available carbohydrate
50g available carbohydrate
Other names: white rice
50g available carbohydrate
50g available carbohydrate
Other names: white rice + tomato sauce
50g available carbohydrate
50g available carbohydrate
Other names: white rice + pesto
Time frame: 2 hours (-10 and 0 -fasting-, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120 minutes)
postprandial response for glucose (IAUC); Comparisons will be made between the spaghetti and rice IAUCs in each of the 3 contexts (alone, with tomato sauce, with pesto)
Time frame: 2 hours (-10 and 0 -fasting-, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120 minutes)
postprandial response for plasma insulin (IAUC)
Time frame: 2 hours (-10 and 0 -fasting-, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120 minutes)
postprandial response for plasma c-peptide (IAUC)
Time frame: 2 hours (-10 and 0 -fasting-, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120 minutes)
maximum value of postprandial glucose response
Time frame: 2 hours
differences in subject-rated satiety using a 100cm visual analog scale
Time frame: 12 minutes
differences in subject-rated palatability using a 100cm visual analog scale
Time frame: 2 hours
differences in subject-rated gastrointestinal symptom questionnaire
University of Parma
Other
The Importance of Glycemic Index on Postprandial Glycemia and Insulinemia in the Context of the Addition of Fat to Carbohydrate Foods: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Spaghetti Versus Rice as Mixed Meals
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03495986
Behavior, Central Nervous System Diseases
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03796897
Behavior, Behavior, Animal
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT02772952
Behavior, Dietary Modification
Málaga, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT03781011
Cardiovascular Diseases, Dietary Modification
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial Details