Anakinra
DrugTreatment with anakinra
Other names: Kineret
NCT Number: NCT03332225
The aim of the study is to conduct one RCT of personalized immunotherapy in sepsis targeting patients who lie either on the predominantly hyper-inflammatory arm or on the predominantly hypo-inflammatory arm of the spectrum of the host response. These patients will be selected by the use of a panel of biomarkers and laboratory findings and they will be randomly allocated to placebo or immunotherapy treatment according to their needs.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
2nd Department of Critical Care Medicine, Athens, Haidari, Greece
Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction that results from the dysregulated host response to an infection. Accumulating knowledge suggests that this dysregulated host response has a broad spectrum where some patients lie to the two extremes of this spectrum whereas the majority of patients lie in between. The first extreme encompasses patients who are dominated from a hyper-inflammatory response to an infectious insult. On the other extreme lie patients who do not have any hyper-inflammatory response; instead these patients are dominated by an exhausted immune response to an infectious stimulus. The remaining patients have features of both hyper- and hypo-inflammatory responses.
Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that have investigated the effects of immunotherapy in sepsis have all failed to establish beneficial effects for the patients. The reasons for that are multiple but one of the most important is the current notion that sepsis is a complex disorder with heterogeneity regarding patient characteristics. Thus, it is necessary to try and find ways to personalise the immunomodulatory treatment of sepsis. In the clinical trial proposed here, two personalised approaches will be investigated.
Some 25 years ago, there were high expectations of the blockade of interleukin (IL)-1 in sepsis using the human recombinant IL-1 receptor antagonist, anakinra. The expectations were based on animal experiments as well as positive results in a single-centre clinical trial. However, in a large international trial, anakinra did not show benefit over placebo. Still, it became clear from this study, enrolling 906 patients that intravenous anakinra was a very safe drug: there was neither excess mortality in these critically ill patients, nor increased susceptibility to secondary infections. In a post-hoc analysis of this trial published in 2016, it was demonstrated that a subgroup of 34 patients showed a clinical picture compatible with macrophage activation syndrome. Since bone marrow was not performed in these patients, the investigators prefer to call this macrophage activation like syndrome (MALS). MALS is a dreaded complication with a mortality rate in the order of 70%. The post-hoc analysis showed that patients receiving anakinra had 30% significant survival benefit compared to those receiving placebo. From these data it can be concluded that it is important to recognize patients with this complication of sepsis and that anakinra might be a beneficial drug.
A survey of the database of sepsis patients in the Hellenic Sepsis Study Group revealed that 5% of the patients with septic shock suffered from MALS. It was found in this study that MAS can be easily and reliably diagnosed by measuring ferritin in the blood. A cut off of 4.420ng/ml had specificity more than 97%.
Another important clinical phenomenon in sepsis is that patients may run into a phase of immunoparalysis. In this situation, the immune cells do not produce any more proinflammatory cytokines and switch to production of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10; they also loose important functional markers such HLA-DR. Patients with immunoparalysis have a 50% risk of dying in the subsequent 28 days. There is evidence from preclinical studies and from the endotoxin challenge model in human volunteers that immunoparalysis is reversible at least to some extent. The best candidate drug for this would be interferon gamma (IFNγ). Immunosuppression established in healthy volunteers after experimental endotoxemia was reversed after administration of recombinant human interferon-gamma (rhIFNγ). rhIFNγ was also investigated for this purpose in nine patients at septic shock in a small open-label and non-randomized clinical trial; reversal of immunoparalysis was achieved. The extensive experience with IFNγ teaches that it is a safe drug, the main side effect being fever and flu-like syndrome, which can be mitigated by premedication with a prostaglandin inhibitor like paracetamol. In patients with autoimmune diseases like systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and multiple sclerosis flares of the disease induced by IFNγ have been described. So these diseases are contraindications for the drug.
The purpose of this study is to investigate in a randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial with a double-dummy design in patients with septic shock, whether personalised immunotherapy directed against either MALS or immunoparalysis is able to change the perspective for these critically ill patients.
MALS is considered as a more direct life-threatening manifestation of sepsis than immunoparalysis. For that reason all patients will be randomised with evidence of MALS for anakinra or placebo, irrespective the state of immunity as measured by HLA-DR positivity.
The aim of the study is to conduct one RCT of personalized immunotherapy in sepsis targeting patients who lie either on the predominantly hyper-inflammatory arm or on the predominantly hypo-inflammatory arm of the spectrum of the host response. These patients will be selected by the use of a panel of biomarkers and laboratory findings and they will be allocated to placebo or immunotherapy treatment according to their needs.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Treatment with anakinra
Other names: Kineret
Treatment with recombinant human interferon-gamma
Other names: Imukin
Treatment with Placebo
Other names: Saline Solution
Time frame: 28 days
Mortality will be compared between the groups of treatment
Time frame: 90 days
Mortality will be compared between the groups of treatment
Time frame: 28 days
The time to decrease of SOFA score by more than 50% will be compared between the groups of treatment
Time frame: 28 days
The time to infection resolution will be compared between the groups of treatment
Time frame: 28 days
The duration of hospitalisation will be compared between the groups of treatment
Time frame: 28 days
The number of secondary infections will be compared between the groups of treatment
Time frame: 4 days
Cytokine stimulation from peripheral blood mononuclear cells will be compared between the groups of treatment
Time frame: 7 days
Cytokine stimulation from peripheral blood mononuclear cells will be compared between the groups of treatment
Time frame: 7 days
Gene expression of peripheral blood mononuclear cells will be compared between the groups of treatment
Time frame: 7 days
Gut microbiome changes will be compared between the groups of treatment
Time frame: 7 days
Epigenetic changes of circulating monocytes will be compared between the groups of treatment
Time frame: 28 days
Classification of the immune function of screened patients not characterized with MALS neither with hypo-inflammation
Hellenic Institute for the Study of Sepsis
Other
A Personalized Randomized Trial of Validation and Restoration of Immune Dysfunction in Severe Infections and Sepsis
Acronym: PROVIDE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06541600
Infections, Inflammation
Wuhan, Hubei, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06080282
Infections, Inflammation
Wuhan, Hubei, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07025096
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Infections
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06876168
Acute Respiratory Failure, Infections
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
View Trial Details