E7777 9 mcg/kg
Drugadministered by intravenous (i.v.) infusion over 60 minutes (+/-10 minutes) on 5 consecutive days during every cycle of 21 days
NCT Number: NCT01871727
The purpose of this trial is to assess the efficacy of E7777 in participants with recurrent or persistent Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL) in Stage I - III participants as assessed by objective response rate (ORR). A lead-in dose-finding part was used to determine dose level 9 microgram per kilogram (mcg/kg) E7777 that is being used to test efficacy and safety.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
This is a multicenter, open-label study of E7777 in participants with recurrent or persistent CTCL. The study consists of an initial Lead-in part (to select recommended dose of E7777 for Main part), followed by the Main part (to test efficacy). Participants will move through three phases while on study: Pretreatment Phase, Treatment Phase, and Extension Phase and a Follow-up Period.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Participants must meet all of the following criteria to be included in the study:
Topical treatments (except topical chemotherapy) and steroids are not considered as prior therapies.
Participants must have recovered from any adverse effects from any previous CTCL therapy to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade <2 before starting study drug. A shorter washout may be allowed if participant is experiencing progressive disease despite ongoing treatment.
Exclusion criteria
Participants who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study:
administered by intravenous (i.v.) infusion over 60 minutes (+/-10 minutes) on 5 consecutive days during every cycle of 21 days
Time frame: Cycle 1 (cycle length was 21 days)
DLTs as per NCI CTCAE v4.03 were defined as 1) serious infusion reaction (CTCAE) Grade 4 adverse event of "Infusion related reaction," or recurrent CTCAE Grade 3 despite administration of systemic steroid premedication after initial occurrence. Infusion reactions were defined as symptoms (example, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, arthralgia, myalgia, pyrexia, chills, rigors) occurring within 24 hours of E7777 infusion. 2) Capillary leak syndrome (CLS) CTCAE Grade 4 or Grade 3 (with exceptions). A CLS event was defined as the noted occurrence of at least 2 of the following: hypotension, edema, or serum albumin less than (<) 3.0 gram per decilitre (g/dL). 3) Clinical visual impairment. 4) Any CTCAE Grade greater than or equal to (>=) 4 adverse event (AE) that may represent an infusion reaction. 5) Any other Grade 3 or greater toxicity assessed as related to E7777 treatment and which in the opinion of a safety consultancy investigator panel, was a dose-limiting toxicity.
Time frame: Cycle 1 (cycle length was 21 days)
The MTD was defined as the safe dose level established in Lead-In Part. MTD was determined by summarizing the number and percentage of participants with DLTs for the first cycle, by study dosing schedule, initial dosing level and overall for the Lead-In Part.
Time frame: From the date of administration of the first dose of the study drug until disease progression (Up to 3 years 6 months)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants whose best overall response (BOR) was complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on independent review committee on 2 assessments at least 3 weeks apart. The tumor response was based on global response score (GRS) Olsen 2011 criteria. CR was defined as disappearance of all evidence of disease and PR was defined as regression of measurable disease and no new sites.
Time frame: From the date of first documentation of CR or PR until date of the first documentation of PD or death due to any cause (Up to 1 year 2 months)
DOR per investigator assessment was defined as the time from date when criteria for response (CR or PR) was first met until the date of the first documentation of disease progression (PD) or date of death from any cause. The tumor assessment was based on GRS Olsen 2011 criteria. CR was defined as disappearance of all evidence of disease and PR was defined as regression of measurable disease and no new sites. PD was defined as any new lesion or unequivocally increase of previously involved sites from nadir.
Time frame: From the date of first documentation of CR or PR until date of the first documentation of PD or death due to any cause (Up to 3 years 6 months)
DOR per independent review committee was defined as the time from the date when criteria for response (CR or PR) was first met until the date of the first documentation of PD or date of death from any cause. The tumor assessment was based on GRS Olsen 2011 criteria. CR was defined as disappearance of all evidence of disease and PR was defined as regression of measurable disease and no new sites. PD was defined as any new lesion or unequivocally increase of previously involved sites from nadir.
Time frame: From the date of administration of the first dose of the study drug until date of the first documentation of PR or CR (Up to 1 year 2 months)
Time to response per investigator assessment was defined as the time from date of first dose to the date of the first documented CR or PR. The tumor assessment was based on GRS Olsen 2011 criteria. CR was defined as disappearance of all evidence of disease and PR was defined as regression of measurable disease and no new sites.
Time frame: From the date of administration of the first dose of the study drug until date of the first documentation of PR or CR (Up to 3 years 6 months)
Time to response per independent review committee was defined as the time from date of first dose to the date of the first documented CR or PR. The tumor assessment was based on GRS Olsen 2011 criteria. CR was defined as disappearance of all evidence of disease and PR was defined as regression of measurable disease and no new sites.
Time frame: From the date of administration of the first dose of the study drug until disease progression (Up to 3 years 6 months)
ORR per investigator assessment was defined as the percentage of participants whose BOR was CR or PR. The tumor response was based on GRS Olsen 2011 criteria. CR was defined as disappearance of all evidence of disease and PR was defined as regression of measurable disease and no new sites.
Time frame: From the date of administration of the first dose of the study drug until disease progression (Up to 3 years 6 months)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants whose BOR was CR, clinical complete response (CCR) or PR per IRC. The tumor response was based on Prince 2010 criteria. CR was defined as disappearance of all evidence of disease and PR was defined as regression of measurable disease and no new sites. CCR was defined as tumor residue not visible on esophagogram, computed tomography (CT), endoscopy, positron emission tomography (PET)-CT.
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose (Up to 3 years and 7 months)
TEAE was defined as an adverse event that had an onset date, or a worsening in severity on or after the first dose of study drug up to the end of the study. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death; life threatening required inpatient hospitalization; resulted in persistent, significant disability; was congenital anomaly/birth defect or medically important due to other reasons than mentioned criteria. Number of participants with TEAEs and SAEs were reported.
Time frame: Cycles 1, 3, 5 Day 1: Pre-dose up to 300 minutes post-dose (Cycle length was 21 days)
Participants were not available for analysis in 15 mcg/kg (Cycles 3 and 5), 6 mcg/kg (Cycle 5), 9 mcg/kg (Cycles 3 and 5), 12 mcg/kg (Cycle 3), hence no Pharmacokinetic (PK) data was collected and analyzed for these doses and cycles.
Time frame: Cycles 1, 3 and 5 Day 1: Pre-dose up to 300 minutes post-dose (Cycle length was 21 days)
Time frame: Cycles 1, 3, 5 Day 1: Pre-dose up to 300 hours Post-dose (Cycle length was 21 days)
Participants were not available for analysis in 15 mcg/kg (Cycles 3 and 5), 6 mcg/kg (Cycle 5), 9 mcg/kg (Cycles 3 and 5), 12 mcg/kg (Cycle 3), hence no PK data was collected and analyzed for these doses and cycles. Here, min*ng/mL means minute*nanogram per milliliter.
Time frame: Cycles 1, 3 and 5 Day 1: Pre-dose up to 300 hours post-dose (Cycle length was 21 days)
Time frame: Cycles 1, 3, 5 Day 1: Pre-dose up to 300 hours post-dose (Cycle length was 21 days)
Participants were not available for analysis in 15 mcg/kg (Cycles 3 and 5), 6 mcg/kg (Cycle 5), 9 mcg/kg (Cycles 3 and 5), 12 mcg/kg (Cycle 3), hence no PK data was collected and analyzed for these doses and cycles.
Time frame: Cycles 1, 3 and 5 Day 1: Pre-dose up to 300 hours post-dose (Cycle length was 21 days)
Participants were not available for analysis at Cycle 3 Day 1, hence no PK data was collected and analyzed for this timepoint.
Time frame: Cycles 1, 3, 5 Day 1: Pre-dose up to 300 hours post-dose (Cycle length was 21 days)
Participants were not available for analysis in 15 mcg/kg (Cycles 3 and 5), 6 mcg/kg (Cycle 5), 9 mcg/kg (Cycles 3 and 5), 12 mcg/kg (Cycle 3), hence no PK data was collected and analyzed for these doses and cycles.
Time frame: Cycles 1, 3 and 5 Day 1: Pre-dose up to 300 hours post-dose (Cycle length was 21 days)
Time frame: Cycles 1, 3, 5 Day 1: Pre-dose up to 300 hours post-dose (Cycle length was 21 days)
Participants were not available for analysis in 15 mcg/kg (Cycles 3 and 5), 6 mcg/kg (Cycle 5), 9 mcg/kg (Cycles 3 and 5), 12 mcg/kg (Cycle 3), hence no PK data was collected and analyzed for these doses and cycles.
Time frame: Cycles 1, 3 and 5 Day 1: Pre-dose up to 300 hours post-dose (Cycle length was 21 days)
Time frame: Cycles 1, 3, 5 Day 1: Pre-dose up to 300 hours post-dose (Cycle length was 21 days)
Participants were not available for analysis in 15 mcg/kg (Cycles 3 and 5), 6 mcg/kg (Cycle 5), 9 mcg/kg (Cycles 3 and 5), 12 mcg/kg (Cycle 3), hence no PK data was collected and analyzed for these doses and cycles. Here, mL/min/kg means milliliter per minute per kilogram.
Time frame: Cycles 1, 3 and 5 Day 1: Pre-dose up to 300 hours post-dose (Cycle length was 21 days)
Participants were not available for analysis at Cycle 3 Day 1, hence no PK data was collected and analyzed for this timepoint.
Time frame: Cycles 1, 3, 5 Day 1: Pre-dose up to 300 hours post-dose (Cycle length was 21 days)
Participants were not available for analysis in 15 mcg/kg (Cycles 3 and 5), 6 mcg/kg (Cycle 5), 9 mcg/kg (Cycles 3 and 5), 12 mcg/kg (Cycle 3), hence no PK data was collected and analyzed for these doses and cycles.
Time frame: Cycles 1, 3 and 5 Day 1: Pre-dose up to 300 hours post-dose (Cycle length was 21 days)
Participants were not available for analysis at Cycle 3 Day 1, hence no PK data was collected and analyzed for this timepoint.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1
Immunogenicity was assessed by determining the anti-E7777 and anti-IL-2 antibodies in serum using validated methods. Percentage of participants testing positive for Anti-E7777 and Anti-IL-2 antibodies were reported.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1
Immunogenicity was assessed by determining the anti-E7777 and anti-IL-2 antibodies in serum using validated methods. Percentage of participants testing positive for Anti-E7777 and Anti-IL-2 antibodies were reported.
Time frame: Up to 30 months
Modified severity weighted assessment tool (mSWAT) was used to measure skin disease severity based on the percentage of body surface area (BSA) with patches, plaques, or tumors. Total scores were calculated by multiplying the BSA percentage for each category of lesion (patch, plaque, or tumor) by a weighting factor and adding the three sub-scores which ranged from 0 (unaffected) to 400 (severely affected). Lower scores indicated a lower degree of skin disease severity. CR corresponded to 100% clearance of skin lesions present at baseline (mSWAT score of 0). PR corresponded to 50-99% clearance of skin disease present at baseline (at least 50% reduction in mSWAT score), without new tumors.
Time frame: Up to 30 months
The duration of skin response based on the mSWAT score was defined as time from the date when criteria for skin response (CR or PR) was first met until the date of documented PD or death due to any cause for those participants with a confirmed PR or CR. mSWAT was used to measure skin disease severity based on the percentage of BSA with patches, plaques, or tumors. Total scores were calculated by multiplying the BSA percentage for each category of lesion (patch, plaque, or tumor) by a weighting factor and adding the three sub-scores which ranged from 0 (unaffected) to 400 (severely affected). Lower scores indicated a lower degree of skin disease severity. CR corresponded to 100% clearance of skin lesions present at baseline (mSWAT score of 0). PR corresponded to 50-99% clearance of skin disease present at baseline (at least 50% reduction in mSWAT score), without new tumors.
Time frame: Up to 30 months
The time to skin response based on the mSWAT score was defined as time from the date of first dose to the date when criteria for skin response (CR or PR) were first met. mSWAT was used to measure skin disease severity based on the percentage of BSA with patches, plaques, or tumors. Total scores were calculated by multiplying the BSA percentage for each category of lesion (patch, plaque, or tumor) by a weighting factor and adding the three sub-scores which ranged from 0 (unaffected) to 400 (severely affected). Lower scores indicated a lower degree of skin disease severity. CR corresponded to 100% clearance of skin lesions present at baseline (mSWAT score of 0). PR corresponded to 50-99% clearance of skin disease present at baseline (at least 50% reduction in mSWAT score), without new tumors.
Eisai Inc.
Industry
A Clinical Study to Demonstrate Safety and Efficacy of E7777 in Persistent or Recurrent Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02232516
Adult Nasal Type Extranodal NK/T-cell Lymphoma, Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06113081
Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma, Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma/Mycosis Fungoides
Ancona, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT00641381
Burkitt Lymphoma, DNA Virus Infections
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03902184
Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases, Immune System Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details