Repevax
Drugvaccine
Other names: Pertussis containing vaccine
NCT Number: NCT02145624
Due to an unexpectedly high number of infant deaths from whooping cough in 2012, the Department of Health acted to protect newborns between birth and completion of primary immunisations, the period with greatest risk of disease.
Vaccination of pregnant women with whooping cough vaccine in the third trimester of pregnancy was instigated nationally, so that antibodies produced by the Mum would cross the placenta to the unborn child, giving them passive protection at the most vulnerable time. This antibody transfer has been known for some time but has not been compared between the two whooping cough vaccines being used in pregnancy. Any effect the raised antibody might have on infant responses to the vaccines given in the first few months of life has also not been measured. This is particularly important as the infant immunisations include some of the same components as the whooping cough vaccines, which include diphtheria, tetanus and polio. Previous studies have shown that high levels of antibody prior to vaccination may affect subsequent antibody responses. It is therefore important to assess whether administration of the whooping cough vaccine in pregnancy adversely affects the protection afforded by the infant vaccines, particularly to those which are similar, namely tetanus and diphtheria as well as meningitis C and Hib vaccines which include diptheria and tetanus components in their structures. This study will assess immune responses of mothers and their babies (~200 pairs) to their vaccinations and will allow the comparison of two whooping cough vaccines being used in pregnancy. This will be done by taking small amounts of blood, which is the only way to measure antibody levels (the proxy of the immune response), before and after the vaccinations. A group of unvaccinated women and their babies (50 pairs) will also be recruited to allow comparison of their immune responses.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me16 year–45 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Gloucestershire, United Kingdom
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Pregnant women who, at the time of enrolment
Exclusion criteria
Participants may not be included in the study if any of the following apply:
All women:
Women to be vaccinated only (i.e. not the control group):
Infants will be vaccinated under the routine national immunisation schedule in accordance with the inclusion/ exclusion criteria set out in the Department of Health "Green Book"
vaccine
Other names: Pertussis containing vaccine
vaccine
Other names: Pertussis containing vaccine
Time frame: Birth, 2, 5 and 13 months of age
To compare antiPertussis Toxin (PT) IgG responses following primary immunisation with an acellular pertussiscontaining vaccine in infants born to mothers who received REPEVAX in pregnancy compared to infants whose mothers received BOOSTRIXIPV in pregnancy.
Time frame: Birth, 2, 5 and 13 months of age
To compare antibody responses to pertussis antigens (concentration of IgG antibody to PT, pertactin (PRN), filamentous haemagglutinnin (FHA) and fimbrial antigens 2 and 3 (FIM 2 and 3]), tetanus toxoid and diphtheria toxoid at birth amongst infants born to mothers who received REPEVAX in pregnancy compared to infants whose mothers received BOOSTRIXIPV in pregnancy
Time frame: Birth, 2, 5 and 13 months of age
To compare antibody responses to pertussis antigens [IgG to PT, PRN, FHA and FIM 2 and 3], Hib antigen [PRP], tetanus toxoid and diphtheria toxoid; meningococcal serogroup C serum bactericidal antibody titres and meningococcal serogroup Cspecific IgG concentrations; 13 serotypespecific pneumococcal IgG concentrations and functional pneumococcal antibody studies at 2, 5 and 13 months of age (just before and one month after primary immunization and one month after booster vaccines) in infants born to mothers who received REPEVAX in pregnancy compared to infants whose mothers received BOOSTRIXIPV in pregnancy and compared to infants whose mothers who did not receive pertussis vaccination in pregnancy
Time frame: birth, 2, 5 13 months
immunogenicity of pnuemococcal conjugate vaccine
Time frame: birth, 2, 5, 13 months
immunogenicity of meningococcal conjugate vaccine
Time frame: borth 2, 5, 13 months
immunogenicity of diphtheria vaccine
Time frame: birth, 2, 5, 13 months
immunogenicity of pertussis vaccination
Public Health England
Other Gov
A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Two Pertussis-containing Vaccines in Pregnancy and Vaccine Responses in UK Mothers and Their Infants
Acronym: iMAP2
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05136599
Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT05264662
Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Johannesburg, GP, South Africa
View Trial DetailsNCT07444502
Actinomycetales Infections, Bacterial Infections
Bangkok, Thailand
View Trial DetailsNCT02453048
Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Huddinge, Stockholm County, Sweden
View Trial Details