Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01570751

A Trial Comparing the Efficacy, Patient-reported Outcomes and Safety of Insulin Degludec 200 U/mL vs Insulin Glargine in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Requiring High-dose Insulin

This trial is conducted in the United States of America (USA). The aim of the trial is to confirm the efficacy of IDeg (insulin degludec) versus IGlar (insulin glargine) in controlling glycaemia. Subjects are to continue their pre-trial metformin treatment.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Novo Nordisk Investigational Site, Manati, Puerto Rico

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Type 2 diabetes
  • Current treatment with once daily insulin glargine in vials with a daily dose equal to or above 65 U and equal to or below 100 U
  • Current treatment with a stable dose of metformin plus/minus one additional oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) for at least 12 weeks
  • Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) equal to or above 7.5%

Exclusion criteria

  • Current treatment with insulin other than insulin glargine in vials
  • Treatment with thiazolidinediones or glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists within 12 weeks
  • Stroke; heart failure; myocardial infarction; unstable angina pectoris; coronary arterial bypass graft or angioplasty
  • Suffer from cancer (except basal cell skin cancer and squamous-cell cancer)

Treatment and study plan

insulin degludec

Drug

Cross-over trial, part 1: Individually adjusted IDeg administered subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once daily for 16 weeks in each treatment period.

insulin glargine

Drug

Cross-over trial, part 2: Individually adjusted IGlar administered subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once daily for the 16 week run-in period followed by 16 weeks in each treatment period.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline (Visit 18) in Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) at the End of Each 16 Week Treatment Period

    Time frame: Week 0, week 16 of each treatment period.

    Values for change in HbA1c after each 16 weeks of treatment periods A and B.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Scores From Baseline to the End of Each 16 Week Treatment Period

    Time frame: Week 0, week 16 of each treatment period.

    Changes in subjects quality of life and insulin device satisfaction were evaluated using the following PROs: the Short-Form 36 Health Survey version 2 (SF-36) and the Treatment Related Impact Measure-Diabetes Device (TRIM-DD). PRO total scores were measured from baseline to the end of each 16-week treatment period. Responses were measured on a scale of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicated a better quality of life and higher insulin device satisfaction on the SF-36 and TRIM-DD questionnaires, respectively.

  2. Change in PRO Scores From the End of Treatment Period A Until After 4 Weeks of Treatment in Treatment Period B

    Time frame: Week 16, week 20

    SF-36 and TRIM-DD total scores were measured at the end of treatment A (week 16) and 4 weeks into treatment B (week 20). Responses were measured on a scale of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicated a better quality of life and higher insulin device satisfaction on the SF-36 and TRIM-DD questionnaires, respectively.

  3. Change From Baseline in Central Laboratory Measured Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at the End of Each 16 Week Treatment Period

    Time frame: Week 0, week 16, week 32

    Values of FPG in mmol/L from baseline to each 16 weeks of treatment periods.

  4. Change in FPG From the End of Treatment Period A Until After 4 Weeks of Treatment in Treatment Period B

    Time frame: Week 16, week 20

    Values of FPG in mmol/L from the end of treatment period A until after 4 weeks of treatment in treatment period B.

  5. Number of Adverse Events (AEs)

    Time frame: From baseline to the end of each 16 week treatment period.

    Number of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) from week 0 to week 16 of the randomised treatment periods. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than 7 days after the last day of randomised treatment. TEAEs were attributed to the treatment given in the period in which the event occurred.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Novo Nordisk A/S

Industry

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Apr 4, 2012
Registry last updated
Mar 7, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.