Webinar
Behavioral1 hour online, interactive webinar that covers shared decision making skills in clinical encounters.
NCT Number: NCT02871739
The Health Decision Sciences Center (HDSC) staff has deployed different approaches to training clinicians to engage patients in shared decision making for common medical tests and treatments. The purpose of the study is to compare the effectiveness of shared decision making (SDM) skills training courses using standardized patient interactions (SPI) and written evaluations.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
There is limited evidence on approaches to training clinicians to engage patients in shared decision making for common medical tests and treatments. The purpose of the study is to compare the effectiveness of different approaches to shared decision making (SDM) skills training. Participants will be randomly assigned to either receive two decision aids or a webinar to review. Participants will also be randomly assigned to receive feedback on standardized patient interaction rating their shared decision making skills and highlighting opportunities for improvement or not. Clinician participants will be assigned to one of four intervention groups using a 2x2 factorial design:
Group 1: Decision aid viewing with feedback Group 2: Decision aid viewing and no feedback Group 3: webinar with feedback Group 4: webinar and no feedback
The pilot study will provide evidence on the comparative effectiveness and feasibility on training formats to determine if:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
1 hour online, interactive webinar that covers shared decision making skills in clinical encounters.
Participants will receive 3 decisions aids to review.
Rating of shared decision making skills and opportunities for improvement based on transcript of a standardized patient interaction
Time frame: Baseline (before intervention) and 4-6 weeks (after intervention)
Transcripts from standardized patient interactions (SPI) will be scored using Braddock's Informed Decision Making (IDM) framework to assess shared decision making skills. Scores with the Braddock's Informed Decision Making Framework range from 0 to 9; the higher scores are better. We subtracted the scores of the baseline SPI collected before the intervention from the second SPI collected 4-6 weeks later, after the intervention, to determine the change in IDM score for each participant and then compared change scores across study arms.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Other
A Pilot Randomized Trial Comparing Approaches to Shared Decision Making Skills Training for Clinicians
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04019119
Back Pain, Behavior
Málaga, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT05410548
Amputation, Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Newark, Delaware, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00672880
Back Pain, Behavior
Durham, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03254719
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Coralville, Iowa, United States
View Trial Details