Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00071799

A Survival Study in Patients With High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes Comparing Azacitidine Versus Conventional Care

The purpose of this study is to determine whether patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) treated with azacitidine have improved survival compared to conventional care treatments. The study will also assess the effect of treatments on response, duration of response, and transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The study will continue for 12 months following last patient enrolled.

See study AZA PH GL 2003 CL 001 E for information about the extension to this study.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Comparison/Control Interventions offered the physician three options:

  • Best supportive care (BSC) alone,
  • Low-dose cytarabine subcutaneously for 14 days every 28 to 42 days, or
  • Standard chemotherapy administered for induction as a continuous intravenous infusion of cytarabine over 7 days plus an anthracycline (daunorubicin, idarubicin, or mitoxantrone) on Days 1, 2, and 3; and, for those eligible, 1 or 2 consolidation cycles administered as continuous intravenous infusions of cytarabine for 3 to 7 days with the same anthracycline that was used at induction on Days 1 and 2 (each cycle between 28 to 70 days from the start of the previous cycle).

All three options included best supportive care. Neither the experimental group (azacitidine) nor any of the comparison/control options allowed use of erythropoietin.

Duration of Intervention: Patients will be treated until death, withdrawal, unacceptable toxicity or conclusion of the study.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Have a diagnosis of refractory anemia with excess blasts or refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation according to the French-American-British classification system for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and a relatively high risk of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) transformation, with an International Prognostic Scoring System score of INT-2 or High.
  • Be 18 years of age or older
  • Have a life expectancy of at least 3 months
  • Be unlikely to proceed to bone marrow or stem cell transplantation therapy following remission
  • Have serum bilirubin levels less than or equal to 1.5 times the upper limit of normal range for the laboratory
  • Have serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (aspartate aminotransferase) or serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (alanine aminotransferase) levels less than or equal to 2 times the upper limit of normal (unless these are considered to be related to transfusion-induced secondary hemosiderosis)
  • Have serum creatinine levels less than or equal to 1.5 times the upper limit of normal

Exclusion criteria

  • Secondary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)
  • Prior treatment with azacitidine;
  • Prior history of acute myeloid leukemia (AML);
  • Malignant disease diagnosed within prior 12 months;
  • Metastatic disease;
  • Hepatic tumors;
  • Radiation, chemotherapy, cytotoxic therapy for non-MDS conditions within prior 12 months;
  • Prior transplantation or cytotoxic therapy to treat MDS;
  • Serious medical illness likely to limit survival to 12 months or less;
  • Treatment with erythropoietin or myeloid growth factors during prior 21 days or androgenic hormones during prior 13 days;
  • Active HIV, viral hepatitis type B or C;
  • Treatment with investigational drugs during prior 30 days;
  • Within the 28-day screening period, documented red cell folate deficiency, as evidenced by red blood cell folate (not serum folate) or vitamin B12 deficiency

Treatment and study plan

Azacitidine

Drug

Azacitidine was injected subcutaneously (SC) at an initial dose of 75mg/m^2/day for 7 days. The 7-day dosing was repeated every 28 days with dose adjustment based on predefined hematology and renal laboratory results. Number of cycles: Azacitidine treatment was to be continued until the end of the study unless treatment was discontinued due to unacceptable toxicity, relapse after complete or partial response, transformation to AML or disease progression.

Other names: AZA

Physician Choice

Other

Physician Choice was one of three options:

  • Best supportive care (BSC) alone,
  • Low-dose cytarabine subcutaneously for 14 days every 28 to 42 days, or
  • Standard chemotherapy administered for induction as a continuous intravenous infusion of cytarabine over 7 days plus an anthracycline (daunorubicin, idarubicin, or mitoxantrone) on Days 1, 2, and 3; and, for those eligible, 1 or 2 consolidation cycles administered as continuous intravenous infusions of cytarabine for 3 to 7 days with the same anthracycline that was used at induction on Days 1 and 2 (each cycle between 28 to 70 days from the start of the previous cycle).

All three options included best supportive care

Other names: cytarabine, anthracycline

Primary outcomes

  1. Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Median Time to Death From Any Cause

    Time frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months

    Kaplan-Meier estimates for the median months until death from any cause within the intent-to-treat population. Patients surviving at the end of the follow-up period were censored at the date of last contact. If a patient withdrew consent to follow-up or was lost to follow-up, the patient was censored as of the last date of contact.

  2. Summary of Subgroup Analyses for Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Death From Any Cause

    Time frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months

    Kaplan-Meier estimates for the median months until death from any cause within the intent-to-treat population. Patients surviving at the end of the follow-up period were censored at the date of last contact. If a patient withdrew consent to follow-up or was lost to follow-up, the patient was censored as of the last date of contact.

    Subgroups that were analyzed are age, gender, French-American-British (FAB) classification, World Health Organization (WHO) classification and International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) classification.

  3. Number of Participants Who Died

    Time frame: 42 months

    Count of participants who died during the study

Secondary outcomes

  1. Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Median Time to Transformation to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Occurred First

    Time frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months

    The time to transformation to AML or death from any cause (whichever occurred first) was defined as the number of days from the date of randomization until the date of documented AML transformation or death from any cause. Patients who did not transform to AML or die were censored at the date of last follow-up.

  2. Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Median Time to Transformation to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

    Time frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months

    The time to transformation to AML was defined as the number of days from the date of randomization until the date of documented AML transformation, defined as a bone marrow blast count ≥ 30% independent of baseline bone marrow count. Patients who did not transform to AML were censored at the date of last follow-up or date of death.

  3. Summary of Participants' Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Status for Participants Who Were Transfusion Dependent at Baseline

    Time frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months

    Summary of dependence and independence from red blood cell (RBC) transfusion at baseline and during treatment, for patients who were dependent at baseline. A patient was considered transfusion independent at baseline if the patient had no transfusions during the 56 days prior to randomization. During study, a patient was considered transfusion independent during the on-treatment period if the patient had no transfusions during any 56 consecutive days or more. Otherwise, the patient was considered transfusion dependent.

  4. Summary of Participants' Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Status for Participants Who Were Transfusion Independent at Baseline

    Time frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months

    Summary of dependence and independence from red blood cell (RBC) transfusion at baseline and during treatment, for patients who were independent at baseline. A patient was considered transfusion independent at baseline if the patient had no transfusions during the 56 days prior to randomization. During study, a patient was considered transfusion independent during the on-treatment period if the patient had no transfusions during any 56 consecutive days or more. Otherwise, the patient was considered transfusion dependent.

  5. Summary of Participants' Platelet Transfusion Status for Participants Who Were Transfusion Dependent at Baseline

    Time frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months

    Summary of dependence and independence from platelet transfusion at baseline and during treatment for patients who were dependent at baseline. A patient was considered transfusion independent at baseline if the patient had no transfusions during the 56 days prior to randomization. During study, a patient was considered transfusion independent during the on-treatment period if the patient had no transfusions during any 56 consecutive days or more. Otherwise, the patient was considered transfusion dependent.

  6. Summary of Participants' Platelet Transfusion Status for Participants Who Were Transfusion Independent at Baseline

    Time frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months

    Summary of dependence and independence from platelet transfusion at baseline and during treatment for patients who were independent at baseline. A patient was considered transfusion independent at baseline if the patient had no transfusions during the 56 days prior to randomization. During study, a patient was considered transfusion independent during the on-treatment period if the patient had no transfusions during any 56 consecutive days or more. Otherwise, the patient was considered transfusion dependent.

  7. Number of Participants Considered Hematologic Responders by Investigator Determinations Using International Working Group (IWG 2000) Criteria for Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)

    Time frame: Day 1 to 42 months

    Investigator determined responses followed IWG criteria for

    • complete remission(CR): repeat bone marrow show <5% myeloblasts, and peripheral blood evaluations lasting >=2 months of hemoglobin(>110 g/L), neutrophils(>=1.5x10^9/L), platelets(>=100x10^9/L), blasts (0%) and no dysplasia
    • partial remission(PR) is the same as CR for peripheral blood: bone marrow shows blasts decrease by >=50% or a less advanced FAB classification from pretreatment
    • stable disease(SD) is a failure to achieve at least a partial remission, but with no evidence of progression for at least 2 months.
  8. Number of Participants Showing Hematologic Improvement Using International Working Group (IWG 2000) Criteria for Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Assessed by Independent Review Committee

    Time frame: Day 1 to 42 months

    IWG 2000 Criteria: Pretreatment=hemoglobin <100g/L or RBC transfusion-dependent, platelet count <100x10^9/L or platelet transfusion dependent, absolute neutrophil count <1.5x10^9/L.

    Erythroid response: Major->20g/L increase or transfusion independent. Minor- 10-20g/L increase or >=50% decrease in transfusion requirements.

    Platelet response: Major-absolute increase of >=30x10^9/L or platelet transfusion independence. Minor->=50% increase.

    Neutrophil response: Major->=100% increase or an absolute increase of >0.5x10^9/L. Minor->=100% increase and absolute increase of <0.5x10^9/L.

  9. Time to Disease Progression, Relapse After Complete or Partial Remission, or Death From Any Cause

    Time frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months

    The time to disease progression, relapse after complete or partial remission (CR, PR), or death from any cause was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the first date of documented disease progression, relapse after CR or PR, or death from any cause.

  10. Duration of Any Hematologic Improvement

    Time frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months

    The duration of improvement was defined as the time from the date of hematologic improvement until the date of first documented progression or relapse after hematologic improvement or death from any cause.

  11. Number of Infections Per Treatment Year Requiring Intravenous Antibiotics, Antifungals or Antivirals

    Time frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months

    The on-treatment adverse event rate of infection requiring IV antibiotics, antifungals, or antivirals per patient-years. The on-treatment period was considered the period from the date of randomization to the last treatment study visit.

  12. Number of Participants in Different Categories of Adverse Experiences During Core Study Period

    Time frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months

    Patient counts for a variety of subsets of adverse experiences for the core study period (day 1 to 42 months). The individual options for Conventional Care Regimens (Best Supportive Care Only, Low-Dose Cytarabine, and Standard Chemotherapy) are presented as separate treatments.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Celgene

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group, Phase 3 Trial of Subcutaneous Azacitidine Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Conventional Care Regimens Plus Best Supportive Care for the Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)

Important dates

Study start
2003
Primary completion
2007
Study completion
2007
First posted
Nov 5, 2003
Registry last updated
Oct 29, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.