Dydrogesterone
DrugOther names: Duphaston
NCT Number: NCT02921763
This survey is intended to collect efficacy and safety data of Duphaston® Tablets in patients with endometriosis under actual condition of its use and to obtain data for effectively and safely utilizing this drug.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–49 year
Female
Observational
Mylan Investigational Site G, Tokyo, Chiyodaku, Japan
In Japan, Duphaston® Tablets have appeared in 1965 for the treatment of endometriosis and been used at some medical institutions. However, after releasing of danazol in the early 1980's and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists in the late 1980's, pseudomenopause therapy became mainstream because of its high efficacy. However, pseudopregnancy therapy was recognized again due to adverse reactions associated with pseudomenopause therapy. After 2000, low-dose estrogen/progestin (LEP) combination drugs (as LEP products, ethinylestradiol/norethisterone combination drug and ethinylestradiol/drospirenone combination drug) and dienogest have been utilized as drugs that are safer and can be administered for a long time. In recent years, Duphaston® Tablets are increasing recognized again from the viewpoints of its efficacy and safety because the drug has no effect to inhibit ovulation or effect on basal body temperature, a diagnosis of ovulation and other conditions may be made by following up basal body temperature, and pregnancy may be achieved even during treatment with Duphaston. As previously mentioned, Duphaston® Tablets are an old drug, and there are only few clinical data from Japanese patients; thus, its latest clinical efficacy and safety data are being demanded again mainly by obstetrician-gynecologists.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Other names: Duphaston
Time frame: Before treatment initiation (baseline), 3 months, and 5 months.
In measurement of ovarian chocolate cyst, on a section visualizing the maximum diameter, two radial directions, namely the maximum diameter (D1) and maximum diameter (D2) orthogonal to D1, will be measured. A chocolate cyst of the ovary will be deemed as a spheroid, and its volume will be calculated using the following formula: [(D1 + D2) × 1/2]3 × 0.52 (π = 3.1). If there are two or more chocolate cysts of the ovary, similarly, two radial directions (D1 and D2) of each cyst will be measured. Also, each of their volumes will be calculated in the same manner.
The change rate within ±15% from the total volume measured before treatment was defined as "unchanged," and the rate out of this range was defined as "decreased" or "increased."
Time frame: Before treatment initiation (baseline), 3 months, and 5 months.
In measurement of ovarian chocolate cyst, on a section visualizing the maximum diameter, two radial directions, namely the maximum diameter (D1) and maximum diameter (D2) orthogonal to D1, will be measured. A chocolate cyst of the ovary will be deemed as a spheroid, and its volume will be calculated using the following formula: [(D1 + D2) × 1/2]3 × 0.52 (π = 3.1). If there are two or more chocolate cysts of the ovary, similarly, two radial directions (D1 and D2) of each cyst will be measured. Also, each of their volumes will be calculated in the same manner.
Time frame: Before treatment initiation (baseline), 3 months, and 5 months.
The absolute change from baseline were calculated on an individual basis and these were totalled and means ± SD calculated.
For the mean value of the absolute changes shown here, the mean value of the absolute changes of the cases that could be measured at each time point is calculated. In other words, of the 57 cases with the volume value of baseline, Cycle 3 calculates the mean value of the absolute change in 39 cases with the volume value at this time, and Cycle 5 calculates the mean value of the absolute change in 40 cases with the volume value at this time.
The remaining 18 cases are excluded from this calculation because there is no volume value for Cycle 3 and the absolute change from baseline cannot be calculated. The same applies to the 17 cases of Cycle 5.
For this reason, these values cannot be calculated directly from the volume mean value at each time point shown in the result measurement 2.
Time frame: Before treatment initiation (baseline), 3 months, and 5 months.
The % change from baseline were calculated on an individual basis and these were totalled and means ± SD calculated.
For the mean value of the % changes shown here, the mean value of the % changes of the cases that could be measured at each time point is calculated. In other words, of the 57 cases with the volume value of baseline, Cycle 3 calculates the mean value of the % change in 39 cases with the volume value at this time, and Cycle 5 calculates the mean value of the % change in 40 cases with the volume value at this time.
The remaining 18 cases are excluded from this calculation because there is no volume value for Cycle 3 and the % change from baseline cannot be calculated. The same applies to the 17 cases of Cycle 5.
For this reason, these values cannot be calculated directly from the volume mean value at each time point shown in the result measurement 2.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 4 months, and 5 months.
The dysmenorrhea score is the sum of the dysmenorrhea severity score and the analgesic use score. Shown as the mean value for the number of cases at each time point.
A dysmenorrhea severity score is defined as follows. None: Score 0, Rarely interfering with work (study and house work): Score 1, Interfering with work (study and house work) requiring lying down to rest: Score 2, Being confined to bed for 1 day, being unable to work (study and house work): Score 3.
A analgesic use score is defined as follows. None: Score 0, An analgesic was used for a day during the last (or current) menstruation period: Score 1, An analgesic was used for 2 days during the last (or current) menstruation period: Score 2, An analgesic was used for 3 days during the last (or current) menstruation period: Score 3 The minimum dysmenorrhea score is 0 and the maximum dysmenorrhea score is 6.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 4 months, and 5 months.
A straight line with a total length of 10 cm was prepared. This straight line was defined as "no pain" at the left end and "Worst pain imaginable" at the right end.
The cases marked the degree of pain on this straight line at each time point, and the length (cm) from the left end of the line (0) was measured.
The minimum value of VAS is 0 cm (no pain) and the maximum value is 10 cm (Worst pain imaginable).
The units on a scale is "cm".
Time frame: Baseline, and 5 months.
CA-125 is a glycoprotein antigen recognized by the monoclonal antibody OC125 made against ovarian cancer cell cultures.
Serum CA125 is commonly used as a tumor marker for ovarian cancer, and since it increases at a high rate in endometriosis, it has an aspect of being used as a diagnostic aid for endometriosis.
There are many reports that the normal value of serum CA-125 is 35 U/mL or less.
The test was performed during a non-menstruation period, as serum CA-125 levels are high during the menstrual period.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 4 months, and 5 months.
The dysmenorrhea score is the sum of the dysmenorrhea severity score and the analgesic use score.
The difference from baseline were calculated on an individual basis and these were totalled and means ± SD calculated.
A dysmenorrhea severity score is defined as follows. None: Score 0, Rarely interfering with work (study and house work): Score 1, Interfering with work (study and house work) requiring lying down to rest: Score 2, Being confined to bed for 1 day, being unable to work (study and house work): Score 3.
A score for the use of analgesics is defined as follows. None: Score 0, An analgesic was used for a day during the last (or current) menstruation period: Score 1, An analgesic was used for 2 days during the last (or current) menstruation period: Score 2, An analgesic was used for 3 days during the last (or current) menstruation period: Score 3
Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 4 months, and 5 months.
A straight line with a total length of 10 cm was prepared. This straight line was defined as "no pain" at the left end and "Worst pain imaginable" at the right end.
The cases marked the degree of pain on this straight line at each time point, and the length (cm) from the left end of the line (0) was measured.
The minimum value of VAS is 0 cm (no pain) and the maximum value is 10 cm (Worst pain imaginable).
The units on a scale is "cm". The difference from baseline were calculated on an individual basis and these were totalled and means ± SD calculated.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 4 months, and 5 months.
A straight line with a total length of 10 cm was prepared. This straight line was defined as "no pain" at the left end and "Worst pain imaginable" at the right end.
The cases marked the degree of pain on this straight line at each time point, and the length (cm) from the left end of the line (0) was measured.
The minimum value of VAS is 0 cm (no pain) and the maximum value is 10 cm (Worst pain imaginable).
The change rate from baseline were calculated on an individual basis and these were totalled and means ± SD calculated.
Time frame: Baseline, and 5 months.
The difference from baseline were calculated on an individual basis and these were totalled and means ± SD calculated.
For the mean value of the difference shown here, the mean value of the difference of the cases that could be measured at each time point is calculated.
In other words, of the 56 cases with baseline serum CA125, cycle 5 can only calculate the difference in 32 cases with serum CA125 at this point.
The mean difference between cycle 5 and baseline in these 32 cases is shown here.
The remaining 24 cases in Baseline are excluded from this calculation because they do not have serum CA125 measurements in Cycle 5.
For this reason, these values cannot be calculated directly from the serum CA125 mean value at each time point shown in the result measurement 7.
Time frame: Baseline, and 5 months.
The change rate from baseline were calculated on an individual basis and these were totalled and means ± SD calculated.
For the mean value of the change rate shown here, the mean value of the change rate of the cases that could be measured at each time point is calculated.
In other words, of the 56 cases with baseline serum CA125, cycle 5 can only calculate the change rate in 32 cases with serum CA125 at this point.
The mean change rate between cycle 5 and baseline in these 32 cases is shown here.
The remaining 24 cases in baseline are excluded from this calculation because they do not have serum CA125 measurements in Cycle 5.
For this reason, these values cannot be calculated directly from the serum CA125 mean value at each time point shown in the result measurement 7.
Mylan Inc.
Industry
Duphaston® Tablets 5 mg - A Survey on Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Endometriosis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07241637
Endometriosis, Fatigue
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05962034
Endometriosis, Female Urogenital Diseases
University Park, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05019612
Endometriosis, Expectations
Hamburg, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT00073801
Chronic Pelvic Pain, Endometriosis
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details