BI 690517
DrugFilm-coated tablets
Other names: Vicadrostat
NCT Number: NCT05182840
This study is open to adults with chronic kidney disease. People with and without type 2 diabetes can take part in this study.
The purpose of this study is to find out whether a medicine called BI 690517 improves kidney function in people with chronic kidney disease when taken alone or in combination with a medicine called empagliflozin.
In the first part of the study, participants take empagliflozin or placebo as tablets every day for 2 months. Placebo tablets look like empagliflozin tablets but do not contain any medicine.
In the second part, participants are divided into several groups. Depending on the group, the participants then additionally take different doses of BI 690517 or placebo as tablets for 3.5 months. In this case, placebo tablets look like BI 690517 tablets but do not contain any medicine.
Participants are in the study for about 6 months. During this time, they visit the study site about 12 times. Where possible, about 4 of the 12 visits can be done at the participant's home instead of the study site. The trial staff may also contact the participants by phone or video call.
Participants collect urine samples at home. These samples are then analysed to assess kidney function. At the end of the trial the results are compared between the different groups. The doctors also regularly check participants' health and take note of any unwanted effects.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
CIMEL centro de Investigaciones Médicas Lanús, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Additional inclusion criteria to be assessed before second randomisation (start of Treatment Period):
Exclusion criteria
Further criteria apply.
Film-coated tablets
Other names: Vicadrostat
Film-coated tablets
Empagliflozin
Placebo to empagliflozin
Time frame: The MMRM model is a longitudinal analysis and it incorporated UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period.
The adjusted mean change (95% confidence interval) in log transformed FMV UACR from baseline at 14 weeks is presented.
The adjusted means and 95 % confidence intervals were estimated by restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed models for repeated measures ((REML)-based MMRM) which includes the fixed effects of treatment at each visit, baseline (continuous) at each visit, and baseline, visit, treatment, background medication (empagliflozin or placebo matching empagliflozin) and randomisation stratum as main effects, as well as random effects of patient.
Time frame: The MMRM model is a longitudinal analysis and it incorporated UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period.
Percent change of first morning void (FMV) urine albumine creatinine ratio (UACR) from baseline to Week 14 based on adjusted median (95% confidence interval (CI)) back transformed from mixed models for repeated measures (MMRM) estimate for all patients is presented.
Percent change of FMV UACR= (FMV UACR at Week 14-FMV UACR at baseline)*100/(FMV UACR at baseline).
MMRM included the fixed effects of treatment at each visit, baseline (continuous) at each visit, and baseline, visit, treatment, background medication (empagliflozin or placebo matching empagliflozin) and randomisation stratum as main effects, as well as random effects of patient.
Time frame: The MMRM model is a longitudinal analysis and it incorporated UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period.
The adjusted mean change (95% confidence interval) in log transformed first morning void (FMV) urine albumine creatinine ratio (UACR) from baseline at 14 weeks for patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin in the Run-in period is presented.
The adjusted means and 95 % confidence intervals were estimated by restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed models for repeated measures ((REML)-based MMRM) which includes the fixed effects of treatment at each visit, baseline (continuous) at each visit, and baseline, visit, treatment, background medication (empagliflozin or placebo matching empagliflozin) and randomisation stratum as main effects, as well as random effects of patient.
Time frame: The MMRM model is a longitudinal analysis and it incorporated UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period.
Percent change of first morning void (FMV) urine albumine creatinine ratio (UACR) from baseline to Week 14 based on adjusted median (95% confidence interval (CI)) back transformed from mixed models for repeated measures (MMRM) estimate for patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin in the Run-in period is presented.
Percent change of FMV UACR= (FMV UACR at Week 14-FMV UACR at baseline)*100/(FMV UACR at baseline).
MMRM included the fixed effects of treatment at each visit, baseline (continuous) at each visit, and baseline, visit, treatment, background medication (empagliflozin or placebo matching empagliflozin) and randomisation stratum as main effects, as well as random effects of patient.
Time frame: The MMRM model is a longitudinal analysis and it incorporated UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period.
The adjusted mean change (95% confidence interval) in log transformed first morning void (FMV) urine albumine creatinine ratio (UACR) from baseline at 14 weeks for patients with background therapy of empagliflozin in the Run-in period is presented.
The adjusted means and 95 % confidence intervals were estimated by restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed models for repeated measures ((REML)-based MMRM) which includes the fixed effects of treatment at each visit, baseline (continuous) at each visit, and baseline, visit, treatment, background medication (empagliflozin or placebo matching empagliflozin) and randomisation stratum as main effects, as well as random effects of patient.
Time frame: The MMRM model is a longitudinal analysis and it incorporated UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period.
Percent change of first morning void (FMV) urine albumine creatinine ratio (UACR) from baseline to Week 14 based on adjusted median (95% confidence interval (CI)) back transformed from mixed models for repeated measures (MMRM) estimate for patients with background therapy of empagliflozin in the Run-in period is presented.
Percent change of FMV UACR= (FMV UACR at Week 14-FMV UACR at baseline)*100/(FMV UACR at baseline).
MMRM included the fixed effects of treatment at each visit, baseline (continuous) at each visit, and baseline, visit, treatment, background medication (empagliflozin or placebo matching empagliflozin) and randomisation stratum as main effects, as well as random effects of patient.
Time frame: UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period were used for the multiple imputation approach.
Number of patients with UACR response I is reported. UACR response I was defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks.
The multiple imputation filled in missing values at Week 14 based on other data observed in the same patient using regression.
Time frame: At baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and at Week 12-14 of the Treatment Period.
Number of patients with UACR response I is reported. UACR response I was defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks.
The missing as non-responder imputes patients with missing Week 14 data as non-responders.
Time frame: UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period were used for the last observation carried forward approach.
Number of patients with UACR response I is reported. UACR response I was defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks.
LOCF uses the last value observed on treatment to substitute all missing values until Week 14.
Time frame: At baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and at Week 12-14 of the Treatment Period.
Number of patients with UACR response I is reported. UACR response I was defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks.
Complete case analysis used patients with both baseline and Week 14 data available.
Time frame: UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period were used for the multiple imputation approach.
Number of patients with UACR response I for patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response I was defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks.
The multiple imputation filled in missing values at Week 14 based on other data observed in the same patient using regression.
Time frame: At baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and at Week 12-14 of the Treatment Period.
Number of patients with UACR response I for patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response I was defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks.
The missing as non-responder imputes patients with missing Week 14 data as non-responders.
Time frame: UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period were used for the last observation carried forward approach.
Number of patients with UACR response I for patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response I was defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void (FMV) urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks.
LOCF uses the last value observed on treatment to substitute all missing values until Week 14.
Time frame: At baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and at Week 12-14 of the Treatment Period.
Number of patients with UACR response I for patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response I was defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks.
Complete case analysis used patients with both baseline and Week 14 data available.
Time frame: UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period were used for the multiple imputation approach.
Number of patients with UACR response I for patients with background therapy of empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response I was defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks.
The multiple imputation filled in missing values at Week 14 based on other data observed in the same patient using regression.
Time frame: At baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and at Week 12-14 of the Treatment Period.
Number of patients with UACR response I for patients with background therapy of empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response I was defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks.
The missing as non-responder imputes patients with missing Week 14 data as non-responders.
Time frame: UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period were used for the last observation carried forward approach.
Number of patients with UACR response I for patients with background therapy of empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response I was defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks.
Last observation on treatment carried forward (LOCF) uses the last value observed on treatment to substitute all missing values until Week 14.
Time frame: At baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and at Week 12-14 of the Treatment Period.
Number of patients with UACR response I for patients with background therapy of empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response I was defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks.
Complete case analysis used patients with both baseline and Week 14 data available.
Time frame: UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period were used for the multiple imputation approach.
Number of patients with UACR response II is reported. UACR response II was defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 week. The multiple imputation filled in missing values at Week 14 based on other data observed in the same patient using regression.
Time frame: At baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and at Week 12-14 of the Treatment Period.
Number of patients with UACR response II is reported. UACR response II was defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks.
The missing as non-responder imputes patients with missing Week 14 data as non-responders.
Time frame: UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period were used for the last observation carried forward approach.
Number of patients with UACR response II is reported. UACR response II was defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks.
LOCF uses the last value observed on treatment to substitute all missing values until Week 14.
Time frame: At baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and at Week 12-14 of the Treatment Period.
Number of patients with UACR response II is reported. UACR response II was defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks.
Complete case analysis used patients with both baseline and Week 14 data available.
Time frame: UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period were used for the multiple imputation approach.
Number of patients with UACR response II for patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response II was defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks.
The multiple imputation filled in missing values at Week 14 based on other data observed in the same patient using regression.
Time frame: At baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and at Week 12-14 of the Treatment Period.
Number of patients with UACR response II for patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response II was defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks.
The missing as non-responder imputes patients with missing Week 14 data as non-responders.
Time frame: UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period were used for the last observation carried forward approach.
Number of patients with UACR response II for patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response II was defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void (FMV) urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks.
LOCF uses the last value observed on treatment to substitute all missing values until Week 14.
Time frame: UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period were used for the multiple imputation approach.
Number of patients with UACR response II for patients with background therapy of empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response II was defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks.
The multiple imputation filled in missing values at Week 14 based on other data observed in the same patient using regression.
Time frame: At baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and at Week 12-14 of the Treatment Period.
Number of patients with UACR response II for patients with background therapy of empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response II was defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks.
The missing as non-responder imputes patients with missing Week 14 data as non-responders.
Time frame: UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period were used for the last observation carried forward approach.
Number of patients with UACR response II for patients with background therapy of empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response II was defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks.
Last observation on treatment carried forward (LOCF) uses the last value observed on treatment to substitute all missing values until Week 14.
Time frame: At baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and at Week 12-14 of the Treatment Period.
Number of patients with UACR response II for patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response II was defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks.
Complete case analysis used patients with both baseline and Week 14 data available.
Time frame: At baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and at Week 12-14 of the Treatment Period.
Number of patients with UACR response II for patients with background therapy of empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response II was defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks.
Complete case analysis used patients with both baseline and Week 14 data available.
Boehringer Ingelheim
Industry
Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled and Parallel Dose Group Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety of Multiple Doses of Oral BI 690517 Over 14 Weeks, Alone and in Combination With Empagliflozin, in Patients With Diabetic and Non-diabetic Chronic Kidney Disease
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06461273
Behavior, Body Weight
Newark, New Jersey, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06287073
Chronic Disease, Disease Attributes
Anyang, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT05490511
CBD, Chronic Disease
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03816111
Chronic Disease, Disease Attributes
Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
View Trial Details