Local Institution
Brescia, 25123, Italy
NCT Number: NCT03188081
The primary objective of this study is to investigate whether an Educational Supported Program (ESP), including tight control procedures implemented through patient home care, has positive impact in terms of better adherence to the therapy with abatacept SC at 12 months after treatment start (1st injection). In the scope of this objective the adherence is measured by the Medication Adherence Questionnaire (MAQ).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Brescia, 25123, Italy
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: 12 months and 24 months
To investigate whether an Educational Support Program (ESP), including tight control procedures implemented through patient home care, has positive impact in terms of better adherence to the therapy with abatacept SC at 12 months and 24 months after treatment start (1st injection)
Time frame: 24 months
Percentage ratio between the total number of injections taken in a treatment period and the total number of injections expected to be taken in the same treatment period according to rheumatologist prescription
Time frame: 24 months
To describe the major characteristics of population of patients in real life conditions at abatacept SC initiation
Time frame: 24 months
To describe the major characteristics of population of patients in real life conditions at abatacept SC initiation
Time frame: 24 months
To describe the major characteristics of population of patients in real life conditions at abatacept SC initiation
Time frame: 24 months
To describe the major characteristics of population of patients in real life conditions at abatacept SC initiation
Time frame: 24 months
To describe the major characteristics of population of patients in real life conditions at abatacept SC initiation
Time frame: 24 months
To describe the major characteristics of population of patients in real life conditions at abatacept SC initiation
Time frame: 24 months
To describe the major characteristics of population of patients in real life conditions at abatacept SC initiation
Time frame: 24 months
To describe the major characteristics of population of patients in real life conditions at abatacept SC initiation
Time frame: 24 months
To describe the major characteristics of population of patients in real life conditions at abatacept SC initiation and to investigate whether a better adherence to the abatacept SC therapy is associated to a better health status of the patient population
Time frame: 24 months
To describe the major characteristics of population of patients in real life conditions at abatacept SC initiation and to investigate whether a better adherence to the abatacept SC therapy is associated to a better health status of the patient population
Time frame: 24 months
To investigate whether a better adherence to the abatacept SC therapy is associated to a better clinical outcome of the patient population
Time frame: 24 months
To investigate whether a better adherence to the abatacept SC therapy is associated to a better clinical outcome of the patient population
Time frame: 24 months
To investigate whether a better adherence to the abatacept SC therapy is associated to a better clinical outcome of the patient population
Time frame: 24 months
To describe the use of concomitant medication for RA (Synthetic DMARDs and corticosteroids) over the study observation period
Time frame: 24 months
To describe the incidence of Adverse Events, by seriousness and relationship with abatacept SC
Time frame: 24 months
To describe the incidence of the reasons for withdrawal from the treatment and the study
Time frame: 24 months
To evaluate the retention rate calculated as the time-to-discontinuation of abatacept SC treatment over the study observation period
Time frame: 24 months
To perform a cost-utility analysis (CUA) from the National Health System
Time frame: 24 months
Societal perspective comparing health consequences Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)
Time frame: 24 months
Two alternative follow-up strategies: ESP versus standard control
Time frame: 24 months
To describe the major characteristics of population of patients in real life conditions at abatacept SC initiation and to investigate whether a better adherence to the abatacept SC therapy is associated to a better health status of the patient population
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Industry
A Prospective, Multicentric, Observational Study to Investigate the Effectiveness of an Education Support Program on Medication Adherence in Italian Real Life RA Patients Treated With Abatacept SC
Acronym: TIGHT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03649178
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03025308
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07715045
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Palembang, South Sumatera, Indonesia
View Trial DetailsNCT00055055
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details