ONCOS-102
BiologicalONCOS-102 was administered by intraperitoneal infusion at weekly intervals for 6 weeks.
Other names: Adenovirus Vector (Ad5/3-D24-GMCSF), Expressing GM-CSF (GM-CSF-encoding adenovirus)
NCT Number: NCT02963831
This is a two-part Phase 1/2 dose escalation and dose expansion study of an Adenovirus Vector (Ad5/3-D24-GMCSF), Expressing GM-CSF (GM-CSF-encoding adenovirus), ONCOS-102, in combination with anti-programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) antibody, durvalumab, in adult subjects with peritoneal disease who have failed prior standard chemotherapy and have histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian cancer or metastatic colorectal cancer.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Research Facility, San Diego, California, United States
ONCOS-102 will be administered intraperitoneally (IP) at weekly intervals for 6 weeks.
A bolus dose of 300 mg cyclophosphamide (CPO) will be administered intravenously (IV) 1 to 3 days before the first infusion of ONCOS-102. Durvalumab will be administered by IV infusion once every four weeks (Q4W) for a total of 12 four-week cycles.
Phase 1 of the study is a dose escalation phase, which will use a 3+3 design to evaluate the safety of ONCOS-102 monotherapy before initiation of durvalumab and to identify the recommended combination dose (RCD) of a fixed dose of durvalumab (1500 mg) + ONCOS-102 at 2 dose levels (1 x 10^11 viral particles (VPs) and 3 x 10^11 VPs).
Subjects treated at the RCD of 3 x 10^11 VPs ONCOS-102 will be included in the Phase 2 expansion cohort based on their tumor diagnosis.
Phase 2 of the study is the dose expansion phase, which will further explore the safety and anti-tumor activity for the RCD in 2 expansion cohorts with peritoneal disease:
Simon's 2-Stage MINIMAX Design will be used in Phase 2 for Expansion Cohorts 1 and 2. In the first stage, 18 subjects will be enrolled in Cohort 1 and 13 subjects in Cohort 2 (including the 6 subjects at the RCD from the dose escalation phase).
If 5 or more subjects in Cohort 1, or one or more subjects in Cohort 2, demonstrate clinical benefit (defined as percentage of subjects who are not in progression at end of Week 24), 15 additional subjects will be enrolled in Stage 2 of Cohort 1, and 14 additional subjects will be enrolled in Stage 2 of Cohort 2.
The primary endpoint is the percentage of subjects who are not in progression at the end of Week 24 as measured by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
ONCOS-102 was administered by intraperitoneal infusion at weekly intervals for 6 weeks.
Other names: Adenovirus Vector (Ad5/3-D24-GMCSF), Expressing GM-CSF (GM-CSF-encoding adenovirus)
Durvalumab was administered by IV infusion once every four weeks for a total of 10 (Cohort A) or 12 four-week cycles.
Other names: MEDI4736, Imfinzi®
A bolus dose of 300 mg cyclophosphamide (CPO) was administered IV 1 to 3 days before the first infusion of ONCOS-102.
Other names: Cytoxan®
Time frame: up to 31 months (90 days after the last dose of study medication).
All Adverse events (AEs) were coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Version 19.0 and classified by MedDRA system organ class (SOC) and preferred term. The severity of AEs was assessed according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 4.03. Adverse events (AEs) were reported based on clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, physical examinations, and any other medically indicated assessments, including subject interviews, from the time informed consent was signed through 90 days after the last dose of study treatment. TEAEs are those that occurred or worsened after administration of the first dose of study treatment.
Deaths within the AE Reporting Period included all deaths that occurred during the study treatment period, or up to 90 days after the administration of the last dose of study drug or initiation of a new treatment.
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
Tumor responses were evaluated using appropriate imaging and categorized according to RECIST 1.1 at Screening (up to 28 days before the first dose of study treatment), at cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 during study treatment, and during on-study follow-up starting 8 weeks after the last disease assessment. Per RECIST 1.1, target lesions were categorized as follows: complete response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions; partial response (PR): ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; PD: ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; stable disease (SD): small changes that do not meet above criteria.
PFS was measured from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of earliest disease progression or to the date of death, if disease progression does not occur. Per RECIST 1.1, progressive disease (PD) is defined as a ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions or the development of new lesions.
Time frame: Up to 29 months
Tumor responses were evaluated using appropriate imaging and categorized according to RECIST 1.1 at Screening (up to 28 days before the first dose of study treatment), at cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 during study treatment, and during on-study follow-up starting 8 weeks after the last disease assessment. Per RECIST 1.1, target lesions were categorized as follows: complete response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions; partial response (PR): ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; PD: ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; stable disease (SD): small changes that do not meet above criteria.
PFS was measured from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of earliest disease progression or to the date of death, if disease progression does not occur. Per RECIST 1.1, progressive disease (PD) is defined as a ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions or the development of new lesions.
Time frame: Up to 15 months
Tumor responses were evaluated using appropriate imaging and categorized according to RECIST 1.1 at Screening (up to 28 days before the first dose of study treatment), at cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 during study treatment, and during on-study follow-up starting 8 weeks after the last disease assessment. Per RECIST 1.1, target lesions were categorized as follows: complete response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions; partial response (PR): ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; PD: ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; stable disease (SD): small changes that do not meet above criteria.
Time frame: Up to 24 Weeks
Tumor responses were evaluated using appropriate imaging and categorized according to irRECIST at Screening (up to 28 days before the first dose of study treatment), at cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 during study treatment, and during on-study follow-up starting 8 weeks after the last disease assessment. Per irRECIST, measurable lesions were categorized as follows: immune-related complete response (irCR): Complete disappearance of all target lesions; immune-related partial response (irPR): ≥ 30% decrease from baseline in the Total Measurable Tumor Burden (TMTB); immune-related progressive disease (irPD): ≥ 20% increase from nadir in TMTB; immune-related stable disease (irSD): not meeting above criteria.
PFS was measured from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of earliest disease progression or to the date of death, if disease progression does not occur. Per irRECIST, irPD is defined as a ≥ 20% increase from nadir in the TMTB.
Time frame: Up to 39 months
Tumor responses were evaluated using appropriate imaging and categorized according to irRECIST at Screening (up to 28 days before the first dose of study treatment), at cycles 3, 5,7, 9, and 11 during study treatment, and during on-study follow-up starting 8 weeks after the last disease assessment. Per irRECIST, measurable lesions were categorized as follows: immune-related complete response (irCR): Complete disappearance of all target lesions; immune-related partial response (irPR): ≥ 30% decrease from baseline in the total measurable tumor burden (TMTB); immune-related progressive disease (irPD): ≥ 20% increase from nadir in TMTB; immune-related stable disease (irSD): not meeting above criteria.
PFS was measured from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of earliest disease progression or to the date of death, if disease progression does not occur. Per irRECIST, irPD is defined as a ≥ 20% increase from nadir in the TMTB.
Time frame: Up to 15 months
Tumor responses were evaluated using appropriate imaging and categorized according to irRECIST at Screening (up to 28 days before the first dose of study treatment), at cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 during study treatment, and during on-study follow-up starting 8 weeks after the last disease assessment. Per irRECIST, measurable lesions were categorized as follows: immune-related complete response (irCR): Complete disappearance of all target lesions; immune-related partial response (irPR): ≥ 30% decrease from baseline in the total measurable tumor burden (TMTB); immune-related progressive disease (irPD): ≥ 20% increase from nadir in TMTB; immune-related stable disease (irSD): not meeting above criteria.
Time frame: Up to 39 months
After completion of treatment, all subjects were followed for survival every 6 months up to 3 years following initiation of study treatment or until June 25, 2022 when all post-study follow-up was completed. OS was measured from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of death or last follow-up (June 25, 2022 when the last follow-up data was collected or earlier). Subjects lost to follow-up are censored on the date when they were last known to be alive.
Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
Other
A Phase 1/2 Dose Escalation Study With Expansion Cohorts to Investigate the Safety, Biologic and Anti-tumor Activity of ONCOS-102 in Combination With Durvalumab in Subjects With Advanced Peritoneal Malignancies
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05185947
Abdominal Neoplasms, Adenocarcinoma
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03604653
Adnexal Diseases, Appendiceal Cancer
Teaneck, New Jersey, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04847063
Abdominal Neoplasms, Adnexal Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04028479
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States
View Trial Details