Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03716973

A Study to Investigate High-density Spinal Cord Stimulation in Virgin-back Patients

This study will look into the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in reducing chronic neuropathic pain in patients who have not had previous spinal surgery. This will be assessed by comparing the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) questionnaire responses before and after the SCS intervention.

We will also investigate the effect of HD frequency parameters on the improvement of quality of life, sleep and any adverse events following the spinal cord stimulation.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Barts Health NHS Trust

London, EC1A 7BE, United Kingdom

About this study

Traditionally, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used for patients with chronic neuropathic pain following back surgery (a condition known as Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS)). Although the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) also recommends SCS for chronic neuropathic pain without previous back surgery, clinical outcome data is much needed in this patient group. Conventionally, patients receiving SCS are provided with tonic stimulation settings (where they feel tingling and paraesthesia); however newer methods include high-density stimulation (HD) that provides higher energy allowing the voltage to be reduced to subthreshold parameters, hence minimizing the tingling and paraesthesia. HD stimulation is widely offered to patients with SCS as part of routine clinical practice, although no known studies have yet investigated HD settings in patients with neuropathic pain without previous spinal surgery. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of HD settings in patients without previous spinal surgery undergoing SCS. 20 patients without previous spinal surgery who are deemed suitable for SCS as part of NICE guidelines 159 pathway will be recruited for the study.

All patients have a trial of SCS where they will be offered HD settings. If successful (>50% improvement in pain scores) they will be offered permanent implant. Those patients whose pain does not improve with HD settings will be further offered conventional tonic stimulation for one more week. Those patients who do not respond to both tonic and HD settings will be excluded and will not have permanent implant. This will also allow us to investigate the patient's preference between the HD neurostimulator settings and conventional tonic settings. We will also investigate the response to these stimulator settings on health related quality of life. Patients will complete quality of life questionnaires at Baseline, 1-month, 3-months and 12-months post-implant.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

  • Male and female patients between 18-75 years of age who have lumbar radiculopathy who have not undergone any spinal surgery.
  • Patients with intractable neuropathic pain due to undergo Percutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation as part of their standard treatment for lumbar neuropathic pain as per NICE HTA guidance 159 at Barts Health NHS Hospitals. The decision would be made by the multidisciplinary team by reviewing the history, MRI scans and patient choice.
  • Patients who have given their written informed consent.
  • Female patients of childbearing potential must be using adequate contraception (i.e. using oral or IM contraception or an IUCD) and must have a negative urine pregnancy test.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with diabetes or any underlying neurological condition.
  • Patients known to have a condition that in the investigator's judgement precludes participation in the study.
  • Patients who have received an investigational drug or have used an investigational device in the 30 days preceding study entry.
  • Patients unable to comply with the study assessments and to complete the questionnaires.

Treatment and study plan

High Density Programming

Device

Patients implanted with Medtronic spinal cord stimulator will have high density programming.

Primary outcomes

  1. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1-month, 3-months, 12months

    Investigate the change in reported pain scores (NRS) following percutaneous spinal cord stimulation (SCS) with Restore Sensor in patients with lumbar radiculopathy who have not undergone any spinal surgery ("virgin back").

Secondary outcomes

  1. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1-month, 3-months, 12months

    low back functional outcome tool

  2. Patient's Global Impression of change (PGIC)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1-month, 3-months, 12months

    A standard seven point scale would be used to assess the SCS outcome.

  3. Pain and Sleep Questionnaire _3 (PSQ_3)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1-month, 3-months, 12months

    A three-item index for the assessment of the impact of pain on sleep.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Barts & The London NHS Trust

Other

Collaborators

  • Medtronic

Registry information

Official study title

An Open Label Pilot Study to Investigate the Response to High Density Stimulation With Medtronic Restore Sensor Technology in Patients With Intractable Neuropathic Pain Who Have Not Had Spinal Surgery

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Oct 23, 2018
Registry last updated
Nov 5, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.