Clintec, Karolinska Institutet
Stockholm, 17176, Sweden
NCT Number: NCT01586741
This is a three armed prospective randomized trial that will compare two different surgical techniques for reconstruction of the abdominal wall diastasis with a conservative treatment procedure.
The study hypothesis:
Which surgical approach provides the safest and best long term results for patients with abdominal wall diastasis either the insertion of net alternative with a double row suture or exercise alone?
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Stockholm, 17176, Sweden
The conservative control group will receive a special training program for abdominal muscle training for 3 months,and all groups wearing girdle for 3 months.
All patients examined with a CT scan before randomization and then a Biodex measurement of abdominal muscle strength.
All patients must also complete the SF-36 (scientifically tested instruments to measure self-reported physical and mental health) and VHPQ (ventral hernia Pain Questionnaire).
Two-thirds of patients receive surgery and followed up with a 3 month and 1-year control.At 1 year of control, all go through a CT scan and a Biodex measurement of muscle strength.
The control group followed up after one and half months and 3 months. In the surgery group, patients may not know what reconstruction they received before the final assessment after 1 year.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The first arm may be insertion of the-mesh The second arm may double row- suture The third arm may be conservative -training
Other names: Quill suture, And Soft mesh Polypropylene mesh
Time frame: follow-up 1 year after surgery
All patients go through a CT scan and clinical examination one year after surgery
Time frame: follow-up 1 year after surgery
adverse event categorize as superficial wound infection, seroma, fistula or deep wound infection
Time frame: follow-up 1 year after surgery
The validity and reliability of the VHPQ make it a useful tool in assessing postoperative pain and patient satisfaction.
PMID:
22446989 PubMed - as supplied by publisher
Karolinska Institutet
Other
A Prospective Randomized Study to Evaluate Two Different Surgical Methods for Treatment for Abdominal Wall Diastasis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06061068
Disease Attributes, Hernia
Nanchong, Sichuan, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06120114
Disease Attributes, Hernia
View Trial DetailsNCT05308251
Digestive System Diseases, Disease Attributes
Samsun, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04850131
Disease Attributes, Neurologic Manifestations
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial Details