MEDI3414 [Influenza A(H1N1) live attenuated, intranasal]
Biological0.5 mL: (intranasal sprayer)
NCT Number: NCT00946101
The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and descriptive immunogenicity of the H1N1 influenza vaccine in healthy children.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me2 year–17 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Coastal Clinic Research, Inc., Mobile, Alabama, United States
The primary objective of this study was to assess the safety and descriptive immunogenicity of a monovalent influenza virus vaccine containing a new 6:2 influenza virus reassortant in healthy children.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
0.5 mL: (intranasal sprayer)
Placebo was supplied in intranasal sprayers containing 0.5 mL of sucrose-phosphate buffer
Time frame: Days 1- 8
The number of participants with fever between the two treatment groups was compared based on the upper limit of the two-sided 95% exact confidence intervals for the rate difference (Vaccine minus Placebo). The upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence intervals was evaluated against the prespecified equivalence criterion of 10% which corresponded to the following hypotheses: H0 (null): rate difference ≥ 10%, HA (alternative): rate difference < 10%.
Time frame: Day 1, Day 15
Seroresponse is described as greater than or equal to a 4-fold rise in hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) titer from baseline. All immunogenicity analyses was based on the immunogenicity population.
Time frame: Day 1, Day 29
Seroresponse is described as greater than or equal to a 4-fold rise in HAI titer from baseline. All immunogenicity analyses are based on the immunogenicity population.
Time frame: Day 1, Day 57
Seroresponse is described as greater than or equal to a 4-fold rise in HAI titer from baseline. All immunogenicity analyses are based on the immunogenicity population.
Time frame: Days 1-8
Other solicited symptoms include fever (> 100°F [37.8°C] axillary), runny/stuffy nose, sore throat, cough, headache, generalized muscle aches, decreased activity level (lethargy) or tiredness/weakness, decreased appetite.
Time frame: Days 1-8
Time frame: Days 1-8
Time frame: Days 1-15
Time frame: Days 1-15
Time frame: Days 1-15
Time frame: Days 29-36
Time frame: Days 29-36
Time frame: Days 29-36
Time frame: Days 29-43
Time frame: Days 29-43
Time frame: Days 29-43
Time frame: Days 1-29
An NOCD was a newly diagnosed medical condition that was of a chronic, ongoing nature and was assessed by the investigator as medically significant. Examples of NOCDs included, but were not limited to, diabetes, asthma, autoimmune disease (eg, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis), and neurological disease (eg, epilepsy, autism). Examples of events not considered NOCDs were mild eczema, diagnosis of a congenital anomaly present at study entry, or acute illness (eg, otitis media, bronchitis).
Time frame: Days 1-29
SAEs were those AEs that resulted in death; were immediately life threatening; resulted in inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; were a congenital anomaly in the offspring of a participant; or were an important medical event that may not have resulted in death, threatened life, or required hospitalization and that, based on appropriate medical judgment, may have jeopardized the participant and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Time frame: Days 29-57
An NOCD was a newly diagnosed medical condition that was of a chronic, ongoing nature and was assessed by the investigator as medically significant. Examples of NOCDs included, but were not limited to, diabetes, asthma, autoimmune disease (eg, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis), and neurological disease (eg, epilepsy, autism). Examples of events not considered NOCDs were mild eczema, diagnosis of a congenital anomaly present at study entry, or acute illness (eg, otitis media, bronchitis).
Time frame: Days 29-57
SAEs were those AEs that resulted in death; were immediately life threatening; resulted in inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; were a congenital anomaly in the offspring of a participant; or were an important medical event that may not have resulted in death, threatened life, or required hospitalization and that, based on appropriate medical judgment, may have jeopardized the participant and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Time frame: Days 1-209
An NOCD was a newly diagnosed medical condition that was of a chronic, ongoing nature and was assessed by the investigator as medically significant. Examples of NOCDs included, but were not limited to, diabetes, asthma, autoimmune disease (eg, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis), and neurological disease (eg, epilepsy, autism). Examples of events not considered NOCDs were mild eczema, diagnosis of a congenital anomaly present at study entry, or acute illness (eg, otitis media, bronchitis).
Time frame: Days 1-209
SAEs were those AEs that resulted in death; were immediately life threatening; resulted in inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; were a congenital anomaly in the offspring of a participant; or were an important medical event that may not have resulted in death, threatened life, or required hospitalization and that, based on appropriate medical judgment, may have jeopardized the participant and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Time frame: Day 1, Day 15
All immunogenicity analyses are based on the immunogenicity population.
Time frame: Day 1, Day 29
All immunogenicity analyses are based on the immunogenicity population.
Time frame: Day 1, Day 57
All immunogenicity analyses are based on the immunogenicity population.
Time frame: Day 1, Day 15
All immunogenicity analyses are based on the immunogenicity population.
Time frame: Day 1, Day 29
All immunogenicity analyses are based on the immunogenicity population.
Time frame: Day 1, Day 57
All immunogenicity analyses are based on the immunogenicity population.
MedImmune LLC
Industry
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety of MEDI3414 in Children
Acronym: MI-CP217
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04794829
COVID-19, Coronaviridae Infections
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07737106
Infections, Influenza
Bayan Nur, Inner Mongolia, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06518577
Infections, Influenza
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06560151
Infections, Influenza
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial Details