Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02548078

A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Candidate Ebola Vaccine in Children

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and reactogenicity of a single IM dose of the GSK3390107A (ChAd3 EBO-Z) vaccine, overall and in children aged 1 to 5, 6 to 12, and 13 to 17 years, separately.

Considering the risk of exposure to Ebola and the potential (based on animal data) for the investigational GSK3390107A (ChAd3-EBO-Z) vaccine to afford at least partial protection, all children in the study will receive the investigational GSK3390107A (ChAd3 EBO-Z) vaccine. The children in the Group GSK3390107A+Nimenrix will receive the investigational GSK3390107A (ChAd3-EBO-Z) vaccine at Day 0 of the study, whereas the children in the Group Nimenrix+GSK3390107A will receive Nimenrix at Day 0 (as a control). At Month 6, the children in the Group Nimenrix+GSK3390107A will receive the investigational GSK3390107A (ChAd3-EBO-Z) vaccine (provided that no safety concerns are raised), whereas the children in the Group GSK3390107A+Nimenrix will receive Nimenrix.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

1 year–17 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

GSK Investigational Site, Bamako, Mali

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject's parent(s)/ legally acceptable representative(s) (LAR[s]) who, in the opinion of the Investigator, can and will comply with the requirements of the protocol (e.g. availability for Diary Card completion, return for follow-up visits, availability for clinical follow-up throughout the study period).
  • Written/ thumb printed informed consent obtained from the subject' parent(s)/ LAR[s] prior to performing any study specific procedure. In addition, written/ thumb printed in-formed assent should be obtained if appropriate (from all subjects aged 13 to 17 years and from younger subjects as per local requirements).
  • A male or female child aged 1 to 17 years inclusive at the time of Screening.
  • Subjects with a negative RDT test for Malaria within 30 days prior to randomisation into the study.

OR Subjects with a positive RDT test for Malaria who completed antimalarial treatment at least 5 days prior to randomisation into the study.

  • Healthy subjects as per Investigator judgement, as estab-lished by medical history, clinical examination and haema-tology/ biochemistry laboratory parameters screening be-fore entering into the study.
  • Female subjects of non-childbearing potential may be enrolled in the study.
  • Non-childbearing potential is defined as pre-menarche or ovariectomy.
  • Female subjects of childbearing potential may be enrolled in the study, if the subject:
  • has practiced adequate contraception for 30 days prior to the Day 0 visit, and
  • has a negative pregnancy test at the Day 0 visit, and
  • has agreed to continue adequate contraception until 30 days after the Month 6 visit

Exclusion criteria

  • Child in care.
  • Use of any investigational or non-registered product (drug or vaccine) other than the study vaccine during the period starting 30 days before the Day 0 visit, or planned use during the study period.
  • Previous vaccination with an investigational EBOV or Marburg vaccine, or previous vaccination with a chim-panzee adenoviral vectored investigational vaccine.
  • Known prior EBOV or SUDV disease.
  • Travel to country affected by the EBOV epidemic or direct contact with person with EVD within 21 days prior to the Day 0 visit.
  • History of any reaction or hypersensitivity (such as ana-phylaxis, urticaria (hives), respiratory difficulty, angioe-dema, or abdominal pain) likely to be exacerbated by any component of the study vaccine.
  • Planned administration/ administration of a vaccine not foreseen by the study protocol in the period starting 30 days before and ending 30 days after each vaccination visit.
  • Acute or chronic illness determined by medical history, clinical examination and laboratory screening tests in-cluding, but not limited to:
  • Clinically significant immunosuppressive or immunodeficient condition (e.g. clinical acquired immune deficiency syndrome [AIDS]).
  • Major congenital defects.
  • Malnutrition (defined as weight for age Z-score less than -3, or other clinical signs of malnutrition).
  • Any clinically significant haematological or biochemical laboratory abnormality.
  • Pregnant female.
  • Any condition that in the Investigator's opinion may po-tentially compromise subject safety or interfere with sub-ject assessment or compliance.

Treatment and study plan

GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Biologicals' investigational recombinant chimpanzee adenovirus Type 3-vectored Ebola Zaire vaccine (ChAd3-EBO-Z) (GSK3390107A)

Biological

A single dose administered intramuscular

Nimenrix powder and solvent for solution for injection in pre-filled syringe; Meningococcal group A, C, W-135 and Y conjugate vaccine

Biological

A single dose administered intramuscular

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Subjects With Solicited Local Symptoms, Overall

    Time frame: During a 7-day follow-up period after each vaccination (i.e. the day of vaccination and 6 subsequent days)

    Assessed solicited local symptoms included: pain and swelling at the injections site. Any = occurrence of the symptom regardless of intensity grade. Grade 3 pain = crying at limb movement/spontaneous pain.Grade 3 swelling = swelling extending on a surface higher than (>) 30 millimeters (mm). Solicited local symptoms, for this endpoint, were assessed in all subjects, in both groups.

  2. Number of Subjects With Solicited Local Symptoms, by Age Stratum

    Time frame: During a 7-day follow-up period after each vaccination (i.e. the day of vaccination and 6 subsequent days)

    Assessed solicited local symptoms included: pain and swelling at the injections site. Any = occurrence of the symptom regardless of intensity grade. Grade 3 pain = crying at limb movement/spontaneous pain.Grade 3 swelling = swelling extending on a surface higher than (>) 30 millimeters (mm), for children between 1-5 years old; > 50 mm for children between 6-12 years old and >100 mm for children between 13-17 years old.

  3. Number of Subjects With Solicited General Symptoms, Overall

    Time frame: During a 7-day follow-up period after each vaccination (i.e. the day of vaccination and 6 subsequent days)

    Solicited general symptoms assessed included: fatigue, fever [defined as axillary temperature equal to or above (≥) 37.5 degrees Celsius (°C)], gastrointestinal symptoms [nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and/or abdominal pain], headache, drowsiness, irritability/fussiness and loss of appetite. Any = occurrence of the symptom regardless of intensity grade. Grade 3 fatigue/headache/drowsiness/gastrointestinal symptoms = fatigue/headache/drowsiness/gastrointestinal symptoms that prevented normal activity. Grade 3 fever = temperature > 39.5°C. Grade 3 irritability/fussiness = crying that couldn't be comforted. Grade 3 loss of appetite = not eating at all. Related = symptom assessed by the investigator as related to the vaccination. Solicited general symptoms, for this endpoint, were assessed in all subjects, in both groups.

  4. Number of Subjects With Solicited General Symptoms, by Age Stratum

    Time frame: During a 7-day follow-up period after each vaccination (i.e. the day of vaccination and 6 subsequent days)

    Solicited general symptoms assessed included: fatigue, fever [defined as axillary temperature equal to or above (≥) 37.5 degrees Celsius (°C)], gastrointestinal symptoms [nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and/or abdominal pain], headache, drowsiness, irritability/fussiness and loss of appetite. Any = occurrence of the symptom regardless of intensity grade. Grade 3 fatigue/headache/drowsiness/gastrointestinal symptoms = fatigue/headache/drowsiness/gastrointestinal symptoms that prevented normal activity. Grade 3 fever = temperature > 39.5°C. Grade 3 irritability/fussiness = crying that couldn't be comforted. Grade 3 loss of appetite = not eating at all. Related = symptom assessed by the investigator as related to the vaccination. Solicited general symptoms, for this endpoint, were assessed in subjects aged 1-5 years, 6-12 years and 13-17 years. Symptoms with no values were not assessed for those specific age groups.

  5. Number of Subjects With Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs), Overall

    Time frame: During the 30-day follow-up period after each vaccination (i.e. the day of vaccination and 29 subsequent days)

    An unsolicited AE covers any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product and reported in addition to those solicited during the clinical study and any solicited symptom with onset outside the specified period of follow-up for solicited symptoms. Any was defined as the occurrence of any unsolicited AE regardless of intensity grade or relation to vaccination. Unsolicited adverse events, for this endpoint, were assessed in all subjects, in both groups.

  6. Number of Subjects With Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs), by Age Stratum

    Time frame: During the 30-day follow-up period after each vaccination (i.e. the day of vaccination and 29 subsequent days)

    An unsolicited AE covers any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product and reported in addition to those solicited during the clinical study and any solicited symptom with onset outside the specified period of follow-up for solicited symptoms. Any was defined as the occurrence of any unsolicited AE regardless of intensity grade or relation to vaccination. Unsolicited AEs, for this endpoint, were assessed in subjects between 1-5 years of age, 6-12 years of age and 13-17 years of age.

  7. Percentage of Subjects With Haematological Laboratory Abnormalities, Overall

    Time frame: At Screening.

    Haematological parameters assessed included: complete blood count (red blood cells [RBC], neutrophils, lymphocytes, white blood cells [WBC], haemoglobin, as well as differential count and platelet count for all subjects, in both groups. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  8. Percentage of Subjects With Haematological Laboratory Abnormalities, by Age Stratum

    Time frame: At Screening

    Haematological parameters assessed included: complete blood count (red blood cells [RBC], neutrophils, lymphocytes, white blood cells [WBC], haemoglobin, as well as differential count and platelet count for subjects aged 1-5 years, 6-12 years and 13-17 years. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  9. Percentage of Subjects With Haematological Laboratory Abnormalities, Overall

    Time frame: At Day 3.

    Haematological parameters assessed included: complete blood count (red blood cells [RBC], neutrophils, lymphocytes, white blood cells [WBC], haemoglobin, as well as differential count and platelet count for all subjects, in both groups. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  10. Percentage of Subjects With Haematological Laboratory Abnormalities, by Age Stratum

    Time frame: At Day 3

    Haematological parameters assessed included: complete blood count (red blood cells [RBC], neutrophils, lymphocytes, white blood cells [WBC], haemoglobin, as well as differential count and platelet count for subjects aged 1-5 years, 6-12 years and 13-17 years. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  11. Percentage of Subjects With Haematological Laboratory Abnormalities, Overall

    Time frame: At Day 6.

    Haematological parameters assessed included: complete blood count (red blood cells [RBC], neutrophils, lymphocytes, white blood cells [WBC], haemoglobin, as well as differential count and platelet count for all subjects, in both groups. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  12. Percentage of Subjects With Haematological Laboratory Abnormalities, by Age Stratum

    Time frame: At Day 6

    Haematological parameters assessed included: complete blood count (red blood cells [RBC], neutrophils, lymphocytes, white blood cells [WBC], haemoglobin, as well as differential count and platelet count for subjects aged 1-5 years, 6-12 years and 13-17 years. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  13. Percentage of Subjects With Haematological Laboratory Abnormalities, Overall

    Time frame: At Day 30.

    Haematological parameters assessed included: complete blood count (red blood cells [RBC], neutrophils, lymphocytes, white blood cells [WBC], haemoglobin, as well as differential count and platelet count for all subjects, in both groups. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  14. Percentage of Subjects With Haematological Laboratory Abnormalities, by Age Stratum

    Time frame: At Day 30

    Haematological parameters assessed included: complete blood count (red blood cells [RBC], neutrophils, lymphocytes, white blood cells [WBC], haemoglobin, as well as differential count and platelet count for subjects aged 1-5 years, 6-12 years and 13-17 years. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  15. Percentage of Subjects With Haematological Laboratory Abnormalities, Overall

    Time frame: At Month 6.

    Haematological parameters assessed included: complete blood count (red blood cells [RBC], neutrophils, lymphocytes, white blood cells [WBC], haemoglobin, as well as differential count and platelet count for all subjects, in both groups. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  16. Percentage of Subjects With Haematological Laboratory Abnormalities, by Age Stratum

    Time frame: At Month 6

    Haematological parameters assessed included: complete blood count (red blood cells [RBC], neutrophils, lymphocytes, white blood cells [WBC], haemoglobin, as well as differential count and platelet count for subjects aged 1-5 years, 6-12 years and 13-17 years. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  17. Percentage of Subjects With Haematological Laboratory Abnormalities, Overall

    Time frame: At Month 6 + 6 Days.

    Haematological parameters assessed included: complete blood count (red blood cells [RBC], neutrophils, lymphocytes, white blood cells [WBC], haemoglobin, as well as differential count and platelet count for all subjects, in both groups. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  18. Percentage of Subjects With Haematological Laboratory Abnormalities, by Age Stratum

    Time frame: At Month 6 + 6 Days

    Haematological parameters assessed included: complete blood count (red blood cells [RBC], neutrophils, lymphocytes, white blood cells [WBC], haemoglobin, as well as differential count and platelet count for subjects aged 1-5 years, 6-12 years and 13-17 years. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  19. Percentage of Subjects With Haematological Laboratory Abnormalities, Overall

    Time frame: At Month 6 + 30 Days.

    Haematological parameters assessed included: complete blood count (red blood cells [RBC], neutrophils, lymphocytes, white blood cells [WBC], haemoglobin, as well as differential count and platelet count for all subjects, in both groups. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  20. Percentage of Subjects With Haematological Laboratory Abnormalities, by Age Stratum

    Time frame: At Month 6 + 30 Days

    Haematological parameters assessed included: complete blood count (red blood cells [RBC], neutrophils, lymphocytes, white blood cells [WBC], haemoglobin, as well as differential count and platelet count for subjects aged 1-5 years, 6-12 years and 13-17 years. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  21. Percentage of Subjects With Haematological Laboratory Abnormalities, Overall

    Time frame: At Month 12.

    Haematological parameters assessed included: complete blood count (red blood cells [RBC], neutrophils, lymphocytes, white blood cells [WBC], haemoglobin, as well as differential count and platelet count for all subjects, in both groups. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  22. Percentage of Subjects With Haematological Laboratory Abnormalities, by Age Stratum

    Time frame: At Month 12

    Haematological parameters assessed included: complete blood count (red blood cells [RBC], neutrophils, lymphocytes, white blood cells [WBC], haemoglobin, as well as differential count and platelet count for subjects aged 1-5 years, 6-12 years and 13-17 years. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  23. Percentage of Subjects With Biochemical Laboratory Abnormalities, Overall

    Time frame: At Screening.

    Biochemical parameters assessed included: alanine aminotransferase [ALT], creatinine [CRE] for all subjects, in both groups. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  24. Percentage of Subjects With Biochemical Laboratory Abnormalities, by Age Stratum

    Time frame: At Screening

    Biochemical parameters assessed included: alanine aminotransferase [ALT], creatinine [CRE] for subjects aged 1-5 years, 6-12 years and 13-17 years. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  25. Percentage of Subjects With Biochemical Laboratory Abnormalities, Overall

    Time frame: At Day 3.

    Biochemical parameters assessed included: alanine aminotransferase [ALT], creatinine [CRE] for all subjects, in both groups. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  26. Percentage of Subjects With Biochemical Laboratory Abnormalities, by Age Stratum

    Time frame: At Day 3

    Biochemical parameters assessed included: alanine aminotransferase [ALT], creatinine [CRE] for subjects aged 1-5 years, 6-12 years and 13-17 years. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  27. Percentage of Subjects With Biochemical Laboratory Abnormalities, Overall

    Time frame: At Day 6.

    Biochemical parameters assessed included: alanine aminotransferase [ALT], creatinine [CRE] for all subjects, in both groups. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  28. Percentage of Subjects With Biochemical Laboratory Abnormalities, by Age Stratum

    Time frame: At Day 6

    Biochemical parameters assessed included: alanine aminotransferase [ALT], creatinine [CRE] for subjects aged 1-5 years, 6-12 years and 13-17 years. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  29. Percentage of Subjects With Biochemical Laboratory Abnormalities, Overall

    Time frame: At Day 30.

    Biochemical parameters assessed included: alanine aminotransferase [ALT], creatinine [CRE] for all subjects, in both groups. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  30. Percentage of Subjects With Biochemical Laboratory Abnormalities, by Age Stratum

    Time frame: At Day 30

    Biochemical parameters assessed included: alanine aminotransferase [ALT], creatinine [CRE] for subjects aged 1-5 years, 6-12 years and 13-17 years. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  31. Percentage of Subjects With Biochemical Laboratory Abnormalities, Overall

    Time frame: At Month 6.

    Biochemical parameters assessed included: alanine aminotransferase [ALT], creatinine [CRE] for all subjects, in both groups. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  32. Percentage of Subjects With Biochemical Laboratory Abnormalities, by Age Stratum

    Time frame: At Month 6

    Biochemical parameters assessed included: alanine aminotransferase [ALT], creatinine [CRE] for subjects aged 1-5 years, 6-12 years and 13-17 years. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  33. Percentage of Subjects With Biochemical Laboratory Abnormalities, Overall

    Time frame: At Month 6 + 6 Days.

    Biochemical parameters assessed included: alanine aminotransferase [ALT], creatinine [CRE] for all subjects, in both groups. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  34. Percentage of Subjects With Biochemical Laboratory Abnormalities, by Age Stratum

    Time frame: At Month 6 + 6 Days

    Biochemical parameters assessed included: alanine aminotransferase [ALT], creatinine [CRE] for subjects aged 1-5 years, 6-12 years and 13-17 years. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  35. Percentage of Subjects With Biochemical Laboratory Abnormalities, Overall

    Time frame: At Month 6 + 30 Days.

    Biochemical parameters assessed included: alanine aminotransferase [ALT], creatinine [CRE] for all subjects, in both groups. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  36. Percentage of Subjects With Biochemical Laboratory Abnormalities, by Age Stratum

    Time frame: At Month 6 + 30 Days

    Biochemical parameters assessed included: alanine aminotransferase [ALT], creatinine [CRE] for subjects aged 1-5 years, 6-12 years and 13-17 years. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  37. Percentage of Subjects With Biochemical Laboratory Abnormalities, Overall

    Time frame: At Month 12.

    Biochemical parameters assessed included: alanine aminotransferase [ALT], creatinine [CRE] for all subjects, in both groups. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  38. Percentage of Subjects With Biochemical Laboratory Abnormalities, by Age Stratum

    Time frame: At Month 12

    Biochemical parameters assessed included: alanine aminotransferase [ALT], creatinine [CRE] for subjects aged 1-5 years, 6-12 years and 13-17 years. Reference range indicators used were: high, low, normal.

  39. Number of Subjects With Adverse Events of Specific Interest (AESI), Overall

    Time frame: During the 7 day follow-up period after vaccination at Day 0 (i.e., Day 0 up to Day 6)

    AESI included clinical symptoms of thrombocytopenia for all subjects, in both groups.

  40. Number of Subjects With Adverse Events of Specific Interest (AESI), by Age Stratum

    Time frame: During the 7 day follow-up period after vaccination at Day 0 (i.e. Day 0 up to Day 6)

    AESI included clinical symptoms of thrombocytopenia for subjects aged 1-5 years, 6-12 years and 13-17 years.

  41. Number of Subjects With Serious Adverse Events, Overall

    Time frame: During the entire study period: From Screening to Month 12

    Serious adverse events (SAEs) assessed include medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or result in disability/incapacity. SAEs, for this endpoint, were assessed in all subjects, in both groups.

  42. Number of Subjects With Serious Adverse Events, by Age Stratum

    Time frame: During the entire study period: From Screening to Month 12

    Serious adverse events (SAEs) assessed include medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or result in disability/incapacity. SAEs, for this endpoint, were assessed in subjects aged 1-5 years, 6-12 years and 13-17 years.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Anti-glycoprotein (GP) Ebola Virus Zaire (EBOV) Antibody Titers, Overall

    Time frame: At Day 0, Day 30, Month 6, Month 6 + 30 Days and Month 12.

    Anti-GP EBOV antibodies were expressed as Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs), as measured by the Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and assessed in all subjects, in both groups.

  2. Anti-GP EBOV Antibody Titers, by Age Stratum

    Time frame: At Day 0, Day 30, Month 6, Month 6 + 30 Days and Month 12

    Anti-GP EBOV antibodies were expressed as Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs), as measured by the Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and assessed in subjects aged 1-5 years, 6-12 years and 13-17 years.

  3. Percentage of Seronegative/Seropositive Subjects for Anti-GP EBOV Antibodies, Overall

    Time frame: At Day 0, Day 30, Month 6 and Month 6 + 30 Days.

    A seronegative subject is a subject whose titer is below the cut-off value. A seropositive subject is a subject whose titer is greater than or equal to the cut-off value. The analysis, for this endpoint, was performed on all subjects, in both groups.

  4. Percentage of Seronegative/Seropositive Subjects for Anti-GP EBOV Antibodies, by Age Stratum

    Time frame: At Day 0, Day 30, Month 6 and Month 6 + 30 Days

    A seronegative subject is a subject whose titer is below the cut-off value. A seropositive subject is a subject whose titer is greater than or equal to the cut-off value. The analysis, for this endpoint, was performed on subjects aged 1-5 years, 6-12 years and 13-17 years.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

GlaxoSmithKline

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Safety and Immunogenicity Study of GSK Biologicals' Investigational Recombinant Chimpanzee Adenovirus Type 3-vectored Ebola Zaire Vaccine (GSK3390107A) in Children in Africa

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Sep 14, 2015
Registry last updated
May 3, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.