Revanesse Shape + with Lidocaine
DeviceRevanesse Shape + with Lidocaine. Participants had 1 cheek treated with Revanesse Shape + with Lidocaine
NCT Number: NCT04927052
To compare the safety and efficacy profiles of Revanesse Shape + with Lidocaine versus Juvederm Voluma with Lidocaine for subcutaneous and/or supraperiosteal injection to improve appearance through the correction of age-related mid-face volume deficit in patients 22 years of age through 65 years of age.
Midface volume deficit / lipoatrophy (loss of subcutaneous adipose tissue that is most apparent in the face) may be associated with acquired conditions, the aging process, or based on genetic causes.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me22 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Laser Rejuvenation, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
This is a randomized, multicenter, double blind, split-face study in subjects seeking to correct mid-face volume deficit. Subjects will be treated with Revanesse Shape + with Lidocaine on one side of the face and Juvederm Voluma with Lidocaine on the other side of the face. The side of the face for each device will be randomly assigned. The Evaluating Investigator performing the evaluations and the subject will be blinded to the treatment; injections of the study device will be performed by an unblinded Treating Investigator.
At each visit, the blinded Evaluating Investigator evaluations and subject evaluations of the treated areas will be performed and recorded.
The initial treatment will be done at Visit 1 and a touch-up if necessary at Visit 3/Month 1. One optimal correction touch-up can be administered for subjects who experience asymmetrical cheeks after Visit 5/Month 3 and before Visit 7/Month 12 . The Blinded Evaluating Investigator will confirm the asymmetry with at least a 1-grade difference between cheeks. The touch up will be offered on the under-corrected side with the same product that was initially implanted. In addition, subjects will have a safety follow-up telephone call 3 days (± 2 days) after any optimal correction touch-up to correct asymmetry administered between Visit 5/Month 3 and Visit 7/Month 12.
Subjects will be retreated at the Month 12 Visit if a ≥ 1 grade change or return to baseline of the MMVS scores on one or both sides of the face.
Treatment Phase
Evaluations include:
Medicis Mid-face Volume Scale (MMVS) score Global Aesthetic Improvement Score (GAIS) by subject and Evaluating Investigator Nasolabial Folds Wrinkle Severity Rating Score (WSRS) Safety will be assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) at all study visits. In addition, other mid-face safety evaluations including firmness, function (movement), mass formation and sensation will be performed at baseline and follow up visits.
Other evaluations include subject overall satisfaction of facial appearance, subject satisfaction with mid-facial region, subject look of mid-face, subject feel of mid-face, subject self-perception of age, subject happiness with contour/shape of mid-face, subject self confidence, subject recommendation to a friend, and subject self perception of age since baseline.
Other analysis includes subject comfort and Unblinded Treating Investigator Ease of Use assessment.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Revanesse Shape + with Lidocaine. Participants had 1 cheek treated with Revanesse Shape + with Lidocaine
Juvederm Voluma with Lidocaine. Participants had 1 cheek treated with Juvederm Voluma with Lidocaine
Time frame: Baseline visit to Visit 6/Month 6.
The blinded evaluating investigator assessed the participant's overall mid-face volume deficit for each cheek using a 4-point photonumeric scale, where: 1=None (fairly full midface) [best] to 4=Substantial (substantial loss of fullness in the mid-face area) [worst]. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement
Time frame: Baseline visit to Visit 7/Month 12
The blinded evaluating investigator assessed the participant's overall mid-face volume deficit for each cheek using a 4-point photonumeric scale, where: 1=None (fairly full midface) [best] to 4=Substantial (substantial loss of fullness in the mid-face area) [worst]. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement
Time frame: Visit 2/Week 2, Visit 3/Month 1, Visit 4/Month 2, Visit 5/Month 3, Visit 6/Month 6, Visit 7/Month 12 and Visit 8/Month 15
The blinded evaluating investigator assessed the participant's nasolabial folds for each cheek using a 5-point scale, where: 1=Absent (No visible folds) [best] to 5=Extreme (Extremely deep and long folds) [worst]. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement
Time frame: Baseline visit to Visit 6/Month 6
Clinical success at Visit 6/Month 6 where success is defined as a subject with at least a 1-grade improvement from baseline on the Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement Score (iGAIS) a 5-point scale where 1=Worse (the appearance is worse than the original condition) [worst] to 5=Very much improved (optimal cosmetic results) [best].
Time frame: Baseline to Visit 6/Month 6
Clinical success at Visit 6/Month 6 where success is defined as a subject with at least a 1-grade improvement from baseline on the Patient Global Aesthetic Improvement Score (pGAIS) a 5-point scale where 1=Worse (the appearance is worse than the original condition) [worst] to 5=Very much improved (optimal cosmetic results) [best].
Time frame: Baseline to Visit 7/Month 12
Clinical success at Visit 7/Month 12 where success is defined as a subject with at least a 1-grade improvement from baseline on the Patient Global Aesthetic Improvement Score (pGAIS) a 5-point scale where 1=Worse (the appearance is worse than the original condition) [worst] to 5=Very much improved (optimal cosmetic results) [best].
Time frame: Baseline to Visit 2/Week 2, Visit 3/Month 1, Visit 4/Month 2, Visit 5/Month 3, Visit 6/Month 6, Visit 7/Month 12 and Visit 8/Month 15and every study visit
Overall Satisfaction with Facial Appearance will be assessed at all visits and prior to any treatment by the subject using a 100 mm VAS scale from 0 = very unsatisfied (worst) to 100 = very satisfied (best)
Time frame: Baseline to Visit 2/Week 2, Visit 3/Month 1, Visit 4/Month 2, Visit 5/Month 3, Visit 6/Month 6, Visit 7/Month 12 and Visit 8/Month 15
Subject satisfaction with mid-facial region will be assessed at all visits and prior to any treatment by the subject using a 100 mm VAS scale from 0 = very unsatisfied (worst) to 100 = very satisfied (best)
Time frame: Baseline to Visit 2/Week 2, Visit 3/Month 1, Visit 4/Month 2, Visit 5/Month 3, Visit 6/Month 6, Visit 7/Month 12 and Visit 8/Month 15
Subject look of mid-face will be assessed at all visits and prior to any treatment by the subject using a 100 mm VAS scale from 0 = very unsatisfied (worst) to 100 = very satisfied (best)
Time frame: Baseline to Visit 2/Week 2, Visit 3/Month 1, Visit 4/Month 2, Visit 5/Month 3, Visit 6/Month 6, Visit 7/Month 12 and Visit 8/Month 15
Subject feel of mid-face will be assessed at all visits and prior to any treatment by the subject using a 100 mm VAS scale from 0 = very unsatisfied (worst) to 100 = very satisfied (best)
Time frame: Baseline to Visit 2/Week 2, Visit 3/Month 1, Visit 4/Month 2, Visit 5/Month 3, Visit 6/Month 6, Visit 7/Month 12 and Visit 8/Month 15
Self-perception of age will be assessed at all visits and prior to any treatment by the subject using a 100 mm VAS scale from 0 = very unsatisfied (worst) to 100 = very satisfied (best)
Time frame: Baseline to Visit 2/Week 2, Visit 3/Month 1, Visit 4/Month 2, Visit 5/Month 3, Visit 6/Month 6, Visit 7/Month 12 and Visit 8/Month 15
Subject happiness with contour/shape of mid-face will be assessed at all visits and prior to any treatment by the subject using a 100 mm VAS scale from 0 = very unsatisfied (worst) to 100 = very satisfied (best)
Time frame: Baseline to Visit 2/Week 2, Visit 3/Month 1, Visit 4/Month 2, Visit 5/Month 3, Visit 6/Month 6, Visit 7/Month 12 and Visit 8/Month 15
Subject's self confidence will be assessed at all visits and prior to any treatment by the subject using a 100 mm VAS scale from 0 = very unsatisfied (worst) to 100 = very satisfied (best)
Time frame: Visit 8/Month 15 or study completion if earlier than Month 15
Subjects will be asked if they would recommend the treatment to a friend
Time frame: Visit 8/Month 15 or study completion if earlier than Month 15
Subjects will be asked their self perception of age since baseline on a 4 point scale with 1 = Not younger than my actual age (worst) to 4=More than 10 years younger than my actual age (best)
Prollenium Medical Technologies Inc.
Industry
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Split-Face Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Revanesse Shape + With Lidocaine Versus Juvederm Voluma With Lidocaine for the Correction of Age-Related Midface Volume Deficit / Lipoatrophy at 6 and 12 Months Post-treatment
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.