Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir Adult Formulation
DrugCo-formulated film-coated tablet (100 mg/40 mg)
Other names: ABT-493/ABT-530, MAVYRET®
NCT Number: NCT03067129
The objectives of this study are to assess the pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir adult formulation in adolescents ages 12 to 17 years and a pediatric formulation of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir in children ages 3 to < 12 years.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me3 year–17 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc /ID# 162173, Woluwe-Saint-Lambert, Brussels Capital, Belgium
This was a multicenter study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, and safety of glecaprevir (GLE) and pibrentasvir (PIB) treatment for 8, 12, or 16 weeks in hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 - 6 (GT1 - GT6)-infected pediatric participants 3 to < 18 years of age, with or without compensated cirrhosis, with or without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection, who are either treatment-naïve (TN), treatment-experienced (TE) with pegylated interferon (pegIFN) with or without ribavirin (RBV), or TE with sofosbuvir (SOF) + RBV with or without pegIFN.
The study was divided into 2 parts, according to the formulation of GLE/PIB administered. Part 1 of the study enrolled HCV GT1 - GT6 infected adolescent participants into the 12 to < 18 years old age group who were willing to swallow the adult formulation of GLE/PIB (Cohort 1). Part 2 of the study enrolled HCV GT1 - GT6 infected pediatric participants divided into the 9 to < 12 (Cohort 2), 6 to < 9 (Cohort 3), and 3 to < 6 (Cohort 4) years old age groups, to receive the pediatric formulation of GLE + PIB. Part 1 enrolled first and once the pediatric formulation was available enrollment into Part 2 commenced, with each cohort enrolled in parallel.
In each cohort, the first group of participants were enrolled into an intense pharmacokinetics (IPK) portion to characterize the PK and safety in each age group, followed by enrollment into a non-IPK safety/efficacy portion. Study participants enrolled in the IPK portion must have been HIV-negative, treatment-naive, and have an identified HCV genotype. In the IPK portion the first approximately six participants received an initial proposed dose of GLE and PIB based on the child's weight and age at screening. PK samples from these participants were evaluated to determine if therapeutic efficacious exposures were attained, comparable to those of adults, and if any dose adjustments were needed. After the intensive PK analysis results for the first six participants were available, enrollment of the remaining IPK portion resumed with subsequent participants receiving an adjusted final dose as applicable. Additional participants may have been required for further intensive PK analysis per age cohort if therapeutic exposure targets were not achieved.
Enrollment into the non-IPK safety and efficacy portions began when the dosing recommendations per age group based on the PK and clinical data from the IPK analysis were ascertained.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Co-formulated film-coated tablet (100 mg/40 mg)
Other names: ABT-493/ABT-530, MAVYRET®
Film-coated pellets/granules (15.67%/8.25%) administered by mixing with a small amount (1-2 teaspoons) of a soft food vehicle, such as hazelnut spread, Greek yogurt, or peanut butter.
Other names: ABT-493/ABT-530
Time frame: Week 2 from predose to 24 hours post-dose
The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) is a method of measurement of the total exposure of a drug in blood plasma. The steady-state exposure of GLE was measured up to 24 hours after dosing at Week 2 and estimated using non-compartmental analysis.
Time frame: Week 2 from predose to 24 hours post-dose
The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) is a method of measurement of the total exposure of a drug in blood plasma. The steady-state exposure of PIB was measured up to 24 hours after dosing at Week 2 and estimated using non-compartmental analysis.
Time frame: 12 weeks after last dose of study drug (Week 20, 24, or 28 depending on treatment duration)
SVR12 is defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) less than the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ; 15 IU/mL) 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug. Plasma HCV RNA levels were collected using the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HCV Quantitative Test v2.0.
SVR12 was considered a primary efficacy endpoint by the United States (US) regulatory agency and was considered secondary outside of the US.
Time frame: Week 2 from predose to 24 hours post-dose
Cmax is the peak concentration that a drug or drug metabolite achieves in a specified compartment after the drug has been administered and before administration of a second dose.
Time frame: Week 2 from predose to 24 hours post-dose
CL/F is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the body. It was estimated by non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis.
Time frame: Week 2 from predose to 24 hours post-dose
Cmax is the peak concentration that a drug or drug metabolite achieves in a specified compartment after the drug has been administered and before administration of a second dose.
Time frame: Week 2 from predose to 24 hours post-dose
CL/F is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the body. It was estimated by non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis.
Time frame: Up to Week 8, 12, or 16 (depending on treatment duration)
On-treatment virologic failure is defined as meeting one of the following:
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug (Week 20, 24, or 28 depending on treatment duration)
Post-treatment relapse is defined as confirmed HCV RNA ≥ 15 IU/mL between the end of treatment and 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug among participants who completed treatment as planned with HCV RNA < 15 IU/mL at the end of treatment; excluding participants who had been shown to be re-infected.
Time frame: From the end of treatment up to post-treatment Week 144
Reinfection is defined as confirmed HCV RNA ≥ 15 IU/mL in the post-treatment period in a participant who had HCV RNA < 15 IU/mL at the Final Treatment Visit, along with post-treatment detection of a different HCV genotype, subtype, or clade compared with Baseline, as determined by phylogenetic analysis of the nonstructural viral protein 3 (NS3) or NS5A, and/or NS5B gene sequences.
Time frame: Final treatment visit (up to Week 8, 12, or 16, depending on treatment duration)
For each participant who received the pediatric formulation (Cohorts 2 - 4), the parent(s)/guardian(s) completed a Palatability Questionnaire to provide feedback on the perception of the dosage form. The Palatability Questionnaire included 6 questions related to the administration and ingestion of the pediatric GLE + PIB formulation.
Question 1 "How Convenient or Inconvenient Was it to Prepare the Dose?" was answered as "very convenient", "convenient", "borderline", "inconvenient", or "very inconvenient".
Time frame: Final treatment visit (up to Week 8, 12, or 16, depending on duration of treatment)
For each participant who received the pediatric formulation (Cohorts 2 - 4), the parent(s)/guardian(s) completed a Palatability Questionnaire to provide feedback on the perception of the dosage form. The Palatability Questionnaire included 6 questions related to the administration and ingestion of the pediatric GLE + PIB formulation.
Question 2 "How Long Did it Typically Take for the Child to Take the Dose?" was answered as "5 minutes or less", "5 to 15 minutes", "15 to 30 minutes", or "more than 30 minutes".
Time frame: Final treatment visit (up to Week 8, 12, or 16, depending on treatment duration)
For each participant who received the pediatric formulation (Cohorts 2 - 4), the parent(s)/guardian(s) completed a Palatability Questionnaire to provide feedback on the perception of the dosage form. The Palatability Questionnaire included 6 questions related to the administration and ingestion of the pediatric GLE + PIB formulation.
Question 3 "Were You Able to Successfully Administer the Whole Dose to the Child With 1 to 2 Teaspoons (5 to 10 mL) of Soft Food?" was answered as "Yes" or "No".
Time frame: Final treatment visit (up to Week 8, 12, or 16 depending on treatment duration)
For each participant who received the pediatric formulation (Cohorts 2 - 4), the parent(s)/guardian(s) completed a Palatability Questionnaire to provide feedback on the perception of the dosage form. The Palatability Questionnaire included 6 questions related to the administration and ingestion of the pediatric GLE + PIB formulation. Question 4 "Did You Experience Any Resistance When Feeding the Child the Medicine?" was answered as "Yes" or "No".
Time frame: Up to final treatment visit (up to Week 8, 12, or 16 depending on treatment duration)
For each participant who received the pediatric formulation (Cohorts 2 - 4), the parent(s)/guardian(s) completed a Palatability Questionnaire to provide feedback on the perception of the dosage form. The Palatability Questionnaire included 6 questions related to the administration and ingestion of the pediatric GLE + PIB formulation. Question 4a "Type of feeding resistance?" tracks feeding resistance experienced at any time during treatment, and was answered as "Did not like taste of medicine", "Did not like texture of medicine", "Did not like the soft food used", "Did not like to swallow the amount of medicine", or "Unrelated to the medicine".
Time frame: Final treatment visit (up to Week 8, 12, or 16, depending on treatment duration)
For each participant who received the pediatric formulation (Cohorts 2 - 4), the parent(s)/guardian(s) completed a Palatability Questionnaire to provide feedback on the perception of the dosage form. The Palatability Questionnaire included 6 questions related to the administration and ingestion of the pediatric GLE/PIB formulation. Question 5 "How Easy or Difficult Was it for the Child to Swallow the Medicine?" was answered as "very easy", "easy", "borderline", "difficult", or "very difficult."
AbbVie
Industry
An Open-Label, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy of Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir in Pediatric Subjects With Genotypes 1-6 Chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection
Acronym: DORA
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03089944
Blood-Borne Infections, Chronic Disease
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03219216
Blood-Borne Infections, Chronic Disease
Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT03235349
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Blood-Borne Infections
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT04214028
Blood-Borne Infections, Chronic Disease
Kariya-shi, Aichi-ken, Japan
View Trial Details