Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06028438

A Study to Evaluate the Nipocalimab and Certolizumab Combination Therapy in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of combination therapy with nipocalimab and certolizumab compared to certolizumab monotherapy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Centro Privado de Medicina Familiar, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and meeting the 2010 American college of rheumatology (ACR) or European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria for RA for at least 3 months before screening
  • Has moderate to severe active RA as defined by persistent disease activity with at least 6 of 66 swollen joints and 6 of 68 tender joints at the time of screening and at baseline
  • Is positive for anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) or rheumatoid factor (RF) by the central laboratory at the time of screening
  • Has C-reactive protein (CRP) greater than or equal to (>=) 0.3 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) by the central laboratory at the time of screening
  • If has received prior biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) (or biosimilars) other than anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agent in RA, has demonstrated inadequate response (IR) or intolerance to the therapy based on one of the following:
  • IR to at least 1bDMARD (or the biosimilars) other than anti-TNF agents, as assessed by the treating physician, after at least 12 weeks of therapy including but not limited to abatacept, anakinra, tocilizumab, and sarilumab or at least 16 weeks of therapy with rituximab Documented IR may include inadequate improvement or loss in response after initial improvement in joint counts or other parameters of disease activity
  • Intolerance to bDMARD (or biosimilars) other than anti-TNF agent, as assessed by the treating physician. Documented intolerance includes side effects and injection or infusion reactions
  • If has received prior anti-TNF agent (including biosimilars), has demonstrated IR to >=1 anti-TNF agent (including biosimilars), as assessed by the treating physician:
  • After at least 12 weeks dosage of etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab (including biosimilars), and/or
  • After at least 14 weeks dosage (example, at least 4 doses) of infliximab (including biosimilars) Documented IR may include inadequate improvement or loss in response after initial improvement in joint counts or other parameters of disease activity

Exclusion criteria

  • Has a confirmed or suspected clinical immunodeficiency syndrome not related to treatment of RA or has a family history of congenital or hereditary immunodeficiency unless confirmed absent
  • Is (anatomically or functionally) asplenic
  • Has experienced myocardial infarction, unstable ischemic heart disease, or stroke less than or equal to (<=) 12 weeks of screening
  • Has a diagnosis of congestive heart failure including medically controlled, asymptomatic congestive heart failure
  • Has a history of known demyelinating disease such as multiple sclerosis or optic neuritis

Treatment and study plan

Placebo

Drug

Placebo will be administered intravenously.

Nipocalimab

Drug

Nipocalimab will be administered intravenously.

Other names: JNJ-80202135, M281

Certolizumab

Drug

Certolizumab will be administered subcutaneously.

Other names: Cimzia

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Index Score 28 Using C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 12

    Change from baseline in DAS28-CRP at Week 12 were reported. The DAS28 is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, and C-reactive protein (CRP; in milligrams per liter [mg/L]). The set of 28 joint count was based on evaluation of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) MCP1 to MCP5, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) PIP1 to PIP5 joints of both the upper right extremity and the upper left extremity as well as the knee joints of lower right and lower left extremities. Score on the DAS28 ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated more disease activity. Negative changes from baseline indicated improvement of arthritis.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response 20 at Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    ACR20 response is defined as: greater than or equal to (>=)20 percent (%) improvement from baseline in both swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints), and >=20% improvement from baseline in 3 of 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using visual analog scale (VAS; 0-100 millimeters [mm], 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity (arthritis, VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=excellent and 100= poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity (arthritis, VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no arthritis activity and 100=extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function as measured by Disability Index of Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI; 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas; range: 0-3, 0= no difficulty, 3= inability to perform task in that area), and CRP.

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response at Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    Percentage of participants who achieved ACR50 at Week 12 were reported. ACR50 response is defined as: >=50% improvement from baseline in both tender joint count (68 joints) and swollen joint count (66 joints), and >=50% improvement from baseline in 3 of 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using visual analog scale (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity (arthritis, VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=excellent and 100= poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no arthritis activity and 100=extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function as measured by Disability Index of Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI; 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas; range: 0-3, 0= no difficulty, 3= inability to perform task in that area), and CRP.

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 70 Response at Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    Percentage of participants who achieved ACR70 response at Week 12 were reported. ACR70 response is defined as: >=70% improvement from baseline in both swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints), and >=70% improvement from baseline in 3 of 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using VAS (0-100 mm, 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity (arthritis, VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=excellent and 100= poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity (arthritis, VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no arthritis activity and 100=extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function as measured by (HAQ-DI) 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas; range: 0-3, 0= no difficulty, 3= inability to perform task in that area), and CRP.

  4. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 90 Response at Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    Percentage of participants who achieved ACR90 response at Week 12 were reported. ACR90 response is defined as: >=90% improvement from baseline in both swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints), and >=90% improvement from baseline in 3 of 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using VAS (0-100 mm, 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity (arthritis, VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=excellent and 100= poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no arthritis activity and 100=extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function as measured by HAQ-DI (20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas; range: 0-3, 0= no difficulty, 3= inability to perform task in that area), and CRP.

  5. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Disease Activity Index Score 28 Using C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) Remission at Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    The DAS28 remission is defined as DAS28 -CRP value of less than (<) 2.6 at Week 12. The DAS28 is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, and CRP (in milligrams per liter [mg/L]). The set of 28 joint count was based on evaluation of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) MCP1 to MCP5, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) PIP1 to PIP5 joints of both the upper right extremity and the upper left extremity as well as the knee joints of lower right and lower left extremities. Score on the DAS28 ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated more disease activity. Negative changes from baseline indicated improvement of arthritis.

  6. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Disease Activity Index Score 28 Using C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    Percentage of participants who achieved DAS28-CRP LDA at Week 12 were reported. DAS28 LDA is defined as a DAS28 value of less than or equal to (<=3.2) at a visit. The DAS28 is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, and CRP (in milligrams per liter [mg/L]). The set of 28 joint count was based on evaluation of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) MCP1 to MCP5, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) PIP1 to PIP5 joints of both the upper right extremity and the upper left extremity as well as the knee joints of lower right and lower left extremities. Score on the DAS28 ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated more disease activity. Negative changes from baseline indicated improvement of arthritis.

  7. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 12

    Change from baseline in HAQ-DI score at Week 12 were reported. The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire that measures the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living, over the past week. Responses in each functional area were scored on a scale from 0 (indicating no difficulty) to 3 (inability to perform a task in that area). Overall score was computed as the sum of category scores and divided by the number of categories answered, score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 represents very severe, high-dependency disability.

  8. Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 12

    Change from baseline in CDAI at Week 12 were reported. The CDAI score is a derived score combining 4 disease assessments: tender joint counts (28 joints), swollen joint counts (28 joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA). Change from baseline in CDAI score measured the change in disease activity, where a negative change indicated an improvement, and a positive change indicated a worsening. The total score range is 0-76. Score interpretation: Remission <=2.8; Low Disease Activity CDAI > 2.8 and <=10; Moderate Disease Activity CDAI >10 and <=22; High Disease Activity CDAI > 22.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase 2a Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Parallel, Proof of Concept Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Nipocalimab and Certolizumab Combination Therapy in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Prior Treatment With Advanced Therapies (bDMARD or tsDMARD)

Acronym: DAISY

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Sep 8, 2023
Registry last updated
Oct 16, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.